Surgery Flashcards

1
Q

TURP BAUS consent

A
almost all
burning bleeding frequency
75%
retograde ejaculation
10-50%
not resolve all symptoms
2-10%
bleeding
stricture
cancer
retreatment
infection
retention
erections 
incontinence 

less 1%
TUR
anaesthetic
death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

TURP efficacy

A

%qmax 150%
IPSS 70%
pvr 77%
qol 70%

retreatment annual 2%, 4% 1 year, 10% 5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
TURP complications
transfusion
death
TUR
sepsis
AUR
clot retention
incontinence
BN stricture
ED
A
Transfusion 3%
death 0.1%
TUR 0.8%
AUR 4.5%
clot retention 5%
UTI 4%
sepsis 3%
incontinence <1%
ED 10%
BN stricture 3-5%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reynard paper outcome TURP

A

1999
failure to void after turp dependent on previous bladder volume

379 patients

12% failed to void after turp on initial twoc, only in those with retention prev
10% AUR
38% with chronic retention >500mls pvr and 44% acute on chronic retention failed to void
only 1% of patients required long term catheter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

persistance of DO after BOO relieved paper

A

Abrams
1979
DO persists in 20-40% of patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DO present in % of men with BOO

A

45-50% of men with BOO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
TUR syndrome
glycine
osmolality
absorption rate
average absorped
glycine metabolismg
A
1.5%
220 mosmol
20ml per min
1.5l on average
liver metabolism
oxidative deamination in liver 90%
and kidney 25%
to GLYOXYLIC ACID and ammonia NH3 which is then broken down to 
GABA and NH3
this depresses cerebrum and can cause hyperammonia encephalopathy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ideal irrigant solution

A

Ideally the irrigation solution should be
isotonic,
non hemolytic,
electrically inert (so that diathermy can be used), non toxic,
transparent,
easy to sterilize and inexpensive
Electrolyte solutions such as normal saline or Ringer Lactate do least harm when ab­sorbed into the circulation.
However they cause disper­sion of high frequency current from the resectoscope and hence abandoned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

water as irrigant

A

Sterile water: Though sterile water has many qualities of an ideal irrigating fluid, the disadvantage is its extreme hypotonicity, causing hemolysis, dilutional hyponatremia, shock and renal failure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

glycine concentration vs serum osmol

A

The os¬molality of 1.5% glycine is 230 mosm/1 compared to se¬rum osmolality of 290 mosm/l and hence cardiovascular and renal toxicities can occur at this concentration also.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

absorption of glycine rate

A

20ml per minute
or around 1.5l for an average case
The uptake of I litre of fluid within one hour, which corresponds to an acute decrease in the serum sodium concentration of 5-8 mmols/l, is the volume above which the risk of absorption related symptoms is statistically in¬creased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

TUR syndrome main components

A

glycine toxicity neurotransmitters
fluid overload
dilutional hyponatraemia
glycine also acting on ANP release and natriuresis
glycine toxicity myocardium
hyperammonia due to glycine metabolism and encephalopathy
hypertension followed by hypotension, rapid equilibrium of hypotonic fluid with EC fluid compartment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

lab findings TUR syndrome

A
hyponatramiea
iso osmolar or mildly hypoosmolar
increased osmolar gap
hyperglycinaemia
hyperammonaemia due to deamination of glycine
met acidosis
haemodilution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when does visual disturbance resolve

A

in 2-12 hours
can be to light perception only
fundoscopy later normal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ethanol test TUR syndrome

A

1% ethanol in irrigant
detect on breathalyser
can detect 75ml absorption per 10 mins of surgery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

management TUR 9

A
  • Stop operation
  • Catheter inflate and pressure
  • Check extravasation – retropubic drain
  • Send bloods
  • Give dose 40mg IV furosemide
  • ITU
  • Serum sodium restored slowed
  • Judicious use of fluid restriction
  • Diuretics
  • Rarely hypertonic saline
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

restoration sodium

A

avoid central pontine demyelination
aim to raise no more than 10-12 per 24 hours or 1 mmol per hour
3% hypertonic saline only indicated neurological manisfestations
do not restor to normal, only to symptom resolving
through central line as sclerosis peripheral veins
bradycardia and hypotension - atropine, adrengeric drugs, IV calcium
anti convulsants seizures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

summary TUR answer

A

Emergency station or BPH station
Definition – absorption of irrigant during the procedure. Causes dilutional hyponatraemia and fluid overload and effects of glycine toxicity.
Manifests as tachycardia or bradycardia, hypotension, headache, confusion, convulsions, cardiac dysrhythmia
How to reduce chances of TUR – minimize resection time especially if capsular perforation/venous bleeding++ (<1hr), reduce height of irrigant to maintain good vision, continuous flow resection.
How to treat – send bloods, keep irrigation to minimum, put catheter on traction, 40mg IV furosemide, ITU monitoring. Serum sodium should be slowly restored with fluid restriction, diuretics and rarely hypertonic saline.

19
Q

advantages Bipolar TURP on systmatic review

A
69 RCT
no long term follow up
shorter catheterisation
shorter hospital time
less complications
no TUR syndrome
no different UTI rate or efficacy
can be used with pacemakers
blood transfusion 1%
can be day case
20
Q

TUIP reoperation rate vs TURP

A

15% vs 2% at 2 years meta analsysis TURP vs TUIP

21
Q
Millins
name
operation procedure
complication transfusion
comparison TURP
A
terence millin 1945
lower midline or pfannenstiel
defat prostate
divide superficial DVC
expose prostate
transverse incision capsule 1cm distal bladder neck
adenoma visible and plane between it and capsule developed
urethra cut distally with scissors
haemostasis
capsule closed
22Fr catheter and drain

vs TURP transfusion 10%
incontinence, stricture reop 1%
meta analysis
operating time and weight superior to holep
longer hospital stay, cathete rtime, transfusion rate and reduced sexual function

22
Q

TUMT

A

TUMT - TransUrethral Microwave Thermotherapy
Microwave energy delivered via catheter with a cooling system designed to protect the urethra. Causes coagulative necrosis and shrinkage of the tissue. Damage to adrenergic nerves also relieves symptoms. Improvement in 55%. Sexual side effects less common than after TURP. Irritative symptoms, period of catheterization and UTI more common than after TURP.

23
Q

TUNA

A

TUNA – TransUrethral Needle Ablation of prostate
Low level radiofrequency delivered via a transurethral needle. The resultant heat causes localized necrosis. LA procedure. Provides a modest improvement in symptoms. Risks incl. bleeding, UTI and stricture. Sexual function preserved. ?Long-term benefit.

24
Q

REZUM

A
radiofrequency generator
single use transurethral device
standard 30 degree cystoscopy lens
lithotomy
RF current applied to inductive coild heater
thermal energy water vapour
delivered prostate
9sec in TZ
via convection diffuses evenly
depth of needle 10mm
upon contact body temp tissue, water vapour condenses, phase shift to liquid state dispenses concentrated energy onto the cell membranes
instant cell necrosis
1-3 injections average each lobe
28% reduction prostate volume 6 months
25
Q

complications rezum

A
33% dysuria
25% bleeding
16-20% pelvic pain
6-7% UTI
4% not relieve symtpoms and retreat within 4 ywars

2% reduced ejcaultory volume

26
Q

complications urolift

A
33% burning stinging
25% bleeding
20% pain discomfort pelvic area
13% not relieve symptoms
3% UTI
3-5% retention 
4% temporary urge inconcinence 
7% urgency
<1% encrustation
27
Q

urolift components

A

Nitinol capsular tab, stainless steel urethral tab and polyethylene suture holding them together.

28
Q

LIFT study

A

Multicenter,
AUA Symptom Index >13, Qmax <12 and prostate volume 30-80cc.
Primary end point was AUASI reduction at 3 months
206 men randomized to UroLift or sham
Result: UroLift reliably performed with patient under LA provides a rapid and sustained improvement in symptoms and flow whilst preserving sexual function

29
Q

urolift and mri

A

Controversial
Creates artefact
Company information states that ‘the patient can be safely scanned under specific MR conditions’

30
Q
ROPE study
TURP
PAE
how many centres
follow up period
drop in IPSS
A
register started in 2015
BJUI 2018
90 TURP 216 PAE
17 centres
TURP 15 point improvement 
PAE 10 point
31
Q

risk penile ischaemia ROPE study

A

1%

32
Q

percentage not suitable for PAE

A

30%

33
Q

prostatic artery from

A

internal pudendal artery, anterior common-gluteal pudendal trunk
superior vesicle
or obturator artery

34
Q

single vs dual prostatic artery supply

A

60% single prostatic artery supply 40% dual prostatic artery supply

35
Q

NICE PAE

A

adequate to support use

selection should be done by uro and int radiologist

36
Q

complications PAE

A
groin haematoma
arterial dissection 2%
sepsis
tranfusion 0.5%
penile ulceration 1%
technical failure 10%
retention 9%
1% bladder wall ischaemia
seminal vesicle ischaemia - non target embolisation
37
Q

LIFT study

A

vs sham
5 yr follow up RCT
qmax improvement 3 ml.sec
14% need surgery

38
Q

BPH 6 study

A
TURP vs urolift
2 year follow up
80 patients
10 centres
Qmax and IPSS better with TURP
Urolift quicker recovery
less retrograde ejaculation
39
Q

Urolift NICE

A
considered as alternative
for use in day case setting
BPH aged to and older
prostate less than 100mls 
without obstructing median lobe
40
Q

NICe review REZUM

longest follow up

A
4 studies
1 blinded control trial
4 year study update
188 men
IPSS change 52% change 21 to 10 sustained at 48 months
qmax 10 to 15, 49% improvement baseline
at 4 years 4.4% retreatment rate
41
Q

NICE greenlight

A

in high risk patients
defined those as increased risk bleeding
or porstate larger than 100
or with urinary retention

42
Q

IPSS fall with urolift

A

50% fall from 22 to 11 at 3 months
sustained 1 year
36% reduction at five years

43
Q
ROPE 
overnight stay
mena procedure time
reop rate
qmax vs turp
A

qmax 3 vs 7.5 for TURP
IPSS 10 vs 15 improvement TURP
29% overnight vs 80% TURP
reop rate 5% > 1 year, 15% <1 year