Supreme Court: Impact on Rights & Policy Flashcards

1
Q

What three things can Supreme Court rulings do?

A
  • Allow an existing policy to continue
  • Remove a policy
  • Create a new policy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What % of rulings are 5-4?

A

19%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What three things are the SC served to do when interpreting the Constitution/Bill of Rights?

A

protect, extend, or challenge individual rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What prison has been a source of tension between the executive and the supreme court?

A

Guantanamo Bay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What cases relate to Guantanamo Bay?

A
  • Hamdan v Rumsfeld 2006
  • Boumediene v Bush 2008
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Hamdan v Rumsfeld 2006 rule?

A
  • Detainees cannot be tried by a military commission, only a court.
  • Congress passed the Military Commissions Act 2006 to overcome this SC ruling.
    5-4 ideology towards liberals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case rules that detainees cannot be tried by a miliary commission, only a court?

A

Hamdan v Rumsfeld 2006

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Boumediene v Bush 2008 rule?

A
  • Detainees have the right to have cases heard in US courts.
  • The Military Commissions Act was unconstitutional.
  • 5-4 (Kennedy) towards Liberals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What case ruled the Military Commissions Act unconstitutional?

A

Boumediene v Bush 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is habeas corpus?

A

The legal right for detainees to go before a judge to have their imprisonment justified or be released.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What Latin phrase relates to the legal right for detainees to go before a judge to have their imprisonment justified or be released?

A

habeas corpus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What cases relate to immigration?

A

Arizona v US 2012
US v Texas 2016
Trump v Hawaii 2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was Arizona v US 2012?

A
  • Arizona demanded immigrants to carry registered documents.
  • The court ruled that states may not implement their own immigration laws.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was US v Texas 2016?

A
  • Court issued a 4-4 vote decision.
  • The case challenged expanded Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA).
  • This challenged Obama’s EO
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was Trump v Hawaii 2018?

A
  • In a 5-4 decision, the Court upheld President Trump’s travel ban.
  • It involved a Presidential Proclamation 9645 signed by Trump, which restricted travel into the United States by people from several nations, or by refugees without valid travel documents.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define ‘Amicus Curiae’.

A

‘Friends of the court’
A document written to the Court for pressure groups trying to influence the outcome

17
Q

What Latin phrase means ‘Friends of the court’.

A

Amicus Curiae

18
Q

What is Affirmative Action?

A

Set of laws that intend to end and correct the effects of specific forms of discrimination

19
Q

What are three methods of achieving legal change?

A
  1. Bring cases to be heard before the courts.
  2. Individuals can bring cases to the court that have a wide ranging impact.
  3. Can also be achieved through amicus curiae briefs by submitting their opinions to the SC for consideration in their cases.
20
Q

What was Schuette v Coalition to defend Affirmative Action 2014?

A
  • It held that an amendment to Michigan’s constitution that prohibits state universities from considering race as part of its admissions process does not violate the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause.
  • Allowed Michigan to get rid of Affirmative Action
  • 6-2 (Kagan wasn’t involved due to conflict of interest)
21
Q

What was Fisher v University of Texas 2016?

A
  • The University of Texas’ use of race as a consideration in the admissions process did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 4-3 majority, citing an amicus curiae brief.
22
Q

What are some methods of achieving change?

A
  • Demonstration & direction
  • Media/social media
  • Voter registration drives
  • Annual conference of pressure groups
23
Q

What are modern examples of demonstration and direction in achieving social change?

A
  • George Floyd protests in 2020
  • Tyre Nichols protests 2023
24
Q

What are modern examples of the media/social media in achieveing social change?

A
  • # BlacklivesMatter
  • # MeToo, drew more than 500,000 people to Washington
25
Q

What was Shelby County v Holder 2013?

A
  • 5-4 con removed Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act which required states to have preclearance from the federal government before changing voting laws in their states.
26
Q

What was the impact of Shelby County v Holder 2013?

A
  • 9 states introduced a photo ID required for all voters run up to 2016. NAACP claimed it put black people at a disadvantage.
  • By 2016, it was estimated that 6 million Americans had lost their right to vote because of previous convictions.
  • In Kentucky, 26% if African Caribbean Americans are disenfranchised.
27
Q

What case removed section 4 of the Voting Rights Act?

A

Shelby County v Holder 2013