sunday Flashcards
When D wants to attack victim’s character, can he introduce reputation and opinion evidence?
Yes
Recollection refreshed rule. When can document be admitted?
For witness’s memory to be refreshed, they can look at any document, whether they wrote it or not, or when it was written. It can then be introduced as evidence only by the other side as impeachment.
When can you introduce character evidence in a civil case against defendant? Reputation ev? Prior bad act?
To prove element of the case. Yes. Yes.
When can prosecutor introduce evidence about the D’s character? Reputation? Prior bad act?
To prove M.O. or motive; if D put own character at issue; also if D argued self-defense and challenged victim’s character. For second 2, only reputation and opinion. To prove m.o. can use prior bad acts.
When D wants to attack victim’s character, can he introduce prior bad act evidence?
No
Rules for admitting police records?
Fine as a public record, but limited to describing activities of the officer. Worry about hearsay within hearsay.
Recorded recollection hearsay exception.
If the witness wrote (or once knew about and adopted) the document themselves when fresh in their minds, and they don’t remember now, they can read the document as their testimony (hearsay exception). They can’t introduce the document itself into evidence. The other side can introduce it as evidence to impeach the witness (but not for substantive evidence)
Must a prior consistent statement to rehabilitate a witness have been made at a formal hearing?
No, similar to impeachment.
Can derivative-use immunity protect a witness from use of the testimony in a civil trial?
No
Remedy if A kills B based on honest but unreasonable self-defense?
Voluntary manslaughter
Result when you get rid of a contingent remainder or executory interest b/c of RAP
The person with the life interest or the fee subject to executory interest retains their interest, but instead of going to the violating person it goes back to the owner’s estate.
Conversion standard
Conversion is an exercise of dominion or control over the plaintiff’s personal property such that the court is justified in requiring the defendant to pay the plaintiff the full value of the property.
-If full value would be too much, then trespass to chattels (hitting someone’s car w/ a hammer)
Does trespass to chattels require P to show actual harm?
Yes, or deprivation of the chattel for a substantial length of time
Common law rule when a contingent remainder fails
Stays with the person with the life estate
In cases of removal based on federal question jurisdiction, who must consent?
Only D’s who have fed question claim brought against them.
Removal requirements for class actions
Any D can consent (don’t need consent from all)