MBE Flashcards
diversity for cross-claims
same transaction/occurrence
no diversity of citizenship / amount in controversy requirements
diversity for counter-claims
same transaction/occurrence.
supplemental jurisdiction to add new P against same D
need diversity. don’t need amount in controversy
requirements for removal
- All D’s must consent to removal w/in 30 days
- if any D citizen of a state where suit brought, can’t remove on diversity grounds
- 1 year time-limit to remove unless bad faith by P
when is there general PJ over an individual D?
- domicile
- served process in state (unless there for summons or b/c of force/fraud)
- served process w/in 100 miles if third-party D or necessary D
when PJ over a foreign D?
domicile if there is one
any state, if fed question + no state has PJ + min contacts w/ US as whole
PJ over a business
if corp: state of incorporation + nerve center
if unincorporated entity: where partners/owners are
venue for business
- anywhere w/ PJ (whether corporation or not)
- use the district that would have PJ if was a state (or the district w/ the most contact)
- also where substantial part of the claim arose
venue for individuals
- if all D in one state, any district where 1 lives
- where substantial part of claim arose
- fallback: anywhere w/ PJ over 1 of the Ds
- after removal, venue proper in any district where the state court sits
venue in suits against govt
- where P lives
- where substantial part of claim arose
- where a D resides (if suing an official)
requirements to transfer to a district
it must have proper venue, unless initial district had proper venue and all parties consent
which district’s law governs after a transfer
if initial district had venue, old one’s
if initial district lacked venue, new one’s
how long to serve notice of a hearing?
14 days (unless ex parte)
how long to serve summons and complaint on D?
120 days (unless good cause) if fails, dismissed w/o prejudice
service of process to a corp
give to agent/officer
can’t just give to an employee
how long does D have to respond if waived service of process?
60 days (90 if foreign)
how long does D have to respond to complaint after receiving process?
21 days
how long does D have to respond to amended complaint?
14 days
in breach of contract suit, do you need to plead the condition precedents were satisfied for other side’s obligation to be triggered?
no
standard for joinder of multiple claims between 1 P and 1 D
automatic, but no automatic supplemental jurisdiction
when can new P intervene to join a lawsuit?
(intervention)
common question of fact or law
must show jurisdiction
requirements for interpleader statute (smj, pj, venue)
- $500 at stake
- minimal diversity
- PJ: whole country
- venue: any district where any claimant resides
requirements for impleader
(T=third party D)
- T liable to D b/c of D’s liability to P
- don’t need diversity wrt T
- P must have diversity against T for claims against T
- need PJ over T
diversity for class action
- assess diversity and amnt in controversy based on named representatives
- CAFA: if >$5m + 100 class members -> minimal diversity, no amt in controvsery
when is jury right available in civil trials?
trials at law (damages). if overlap do legal issues first.
deadline for filing a motion for new trial?
28 days from judgment
When are interlocutory appeals available?
automatic: injunction (new or modification); class action cert; possession of property.
discretionary: controlling Q of law + answering now will immediately advance termination of litigation. (certify)
- collateral order doctrine (separable issue)
standard of review for jury finding of fact?
substantial evidence
standard of review for bench trial finding of fact?
clearly erroneous
exceptions to full faith and credit to other court judgments
1) judgment court lacked jurisdiction
2) changed circumstances
requirements for res judicata
(claim preclusion)
- final judgment on the merits
- same parties (or successors)
- same claim (same trnsct/occurrence) or cause of action
requirements for collateral estoppel
(issue preclusion)
- same factual issue
- issue was actually and necessarily decided in prior suit
- the party to be precluded was a party to the prior suit
how many preemptory challenges in jury selection? what can’t they be based on?
- race and gender
limits on suing states
can’t sue for money damages in its own court or in fed court, unless consents or 14th am.
- can sue in other state courts
- local govts not covered
elements of standing
- injury (concrete, particularized, future ok but not hypothetical)
- causation
- redressability (likely that court can fix)
when do taxpayer’s have standing to challenge govt expenditure?
to challenge expenditure that violates establishment clause
inherent presidential powers
veto, pardon/commute, hire/fire executive officers (action on behalf of fed govt vs just investigative)
power of treaties
once ratified, same status as statute. if not self-executing (implementing legislation) then doesn’t trump states. if executive agreement, then status of executive order.
impoundment rules
pres can’t refuse to spend money congress has required to be spent.
speech or debate clause immunity for members of congress
can’t use their official acts (votes, introductions of bills) as evidence against them
when does congress need to approve interstate compact?
when implicates a federal interest
can a state directly tax fed govt?
no
priv and immunity clause of art 4
no “serious discrimination” against out-of-state residents w/o sufficient justification.
- serious: job requirements. park admissions, hunting licenses okay to discrim against.
- ONLY INDIVIDUALS protected
- so can’t require residency for private employment (can for public)
when does a state reg violate dormant commerce clause?
- discrimination against out of state interests (e.g. requiring using in-state firms), OR
- unduly burdens interstate commerce, OR
- applies to wholly extra-territorial activity
- undue burden = very high standard (very costly, tiny benefits; maybe met if less costly alternative)
- exceptions: subsidies to citizens; when state is a market participant; congress says otherwise
When can a state tax commerce?
“substantial nexus” between taxing state and thing being taxed
when can a state tax personal property in the state?
any good physically in its borders, as long as good is stopped for a business purpose
-can tax fraction of value of instrumentalities of commerce
what liberty interests protected under procedural due process?
right to work, travel, procreate, marry, physical injury, legal rights (e.g. free speech), stigma that affect ability to be employed
timing of hearing for disability benefit revocation
post-deprivation is fine
timing of hearing for dismissing student on academic grounds
must be pre-deprivation
intermediate scrutiny standard
substantially related to important interest
scrutiny standard for illegitimate child discrimination?
intermediate
requirements for parental notification for abortion law?
fine
requirement for parental consent for abortion?
alternative way to get if go before a judge
when can fed govt discriminate based on citizenship?
anytime
when can a state govt discriminate based on citizenship?
essential state function, like teacher, police, jury, voting
when is affirmative action valid
correcting past discrimination by same actor, OR
college or grad school admissions (and holistic)
standard of review on race based affirmative action
strict scrutiny
can statutory rape laws discrim based on gender?
yes
when does 1 person 1 vote apply?
elections of representatives by district (not senate)
-exception: if limited government body, can apportion votes based on interest
can you gerrymander based on race?
yes, but not predominant factor
ex post facto law problem for civil liability?
no
what is the contract clause
states can’t legislate impairments to existing contracts, unless overriding need (e.g. great depression)
-doesn’t apply to fed govt
do zoning regulations count as a taking?
no, as long as advance legitimate interest AND doesn’t extinguish fundamental attribute of ownership
elements to the lemon test
1) secular purpose
2) no excessive entanglement in religion
3) primary effect neither advances nor inhibits religion
when most worried about public endorsements of religion
settings where likely to be coercive (schools), or if clear endorsement. sometimes need to dilute religious message
when are laws against expressive conduct ok?
1) prohibiting the expressive part is secondary effect, not the purpose
2) substantial interest
3) burden no greater than necessary
when can govt regulate verbal speech in a public forum?
(TPM)
1) content neutral (or exception applies)
2) leaves open alternate channels of communication
3) narrowly tailored to significant government interest
Otherwise, strict scrutiny
when can govt regulate speech on private property
strict scrutiny
when can govt regulate speech on public property that’s not a public forum?
must be reasonable (i.e. viewpoint neutral)
requirements to meet obscenity exception
1) prurient
2) lacking any serious value (nat’l standard)
3) offensive to avg person
4) not overbroad
which content based speech regulations are okay?
(only ok if viewpoint neutral)
- obscenity
- incitement to violence
- fighting words
- defamation
- commercial speech that’s misleading
can govt limit contributions to a ballot initiative?
no
when can govt limit contributions to a candidate?
yes if satisfies intermediate scrutiny. “closely drawn” to correspond to important interest
when can govt limit independent expenditures
never
can law give publicly-funded candidates extra money if their opponents outspend?
no
who gets to file a habeas suit?
anyone detained by US in territory over which US has sovereign control (e.g. outside US)
how decide if jury right if legal and equitable remedies asked for?
try the legal issues first
common law requirements for what must be included in an offer?
price, quantity, parties
UCC requirements for what must be included in an offer
quantity and parties
when is a revocation effective?
when offeree learns of it
does death of offeror terminate the offer?
yes unless consideration was paid to keep open
when is an offer irrevocable?
- partial performance of unilateral offer
- consideration paid
- firm offer by merchant
- detrimental reliance
requirements for a firm offer by a merchant
written promise to keep open
- signature/initials/letterhead
- reasonable amount of time (
can seller accept a contract by shipping the wrong goods?
UCC says this is acceptance + breach
what are exceptions to mailbox rule?
- if first sent rejection before sending acceptance. then whichever one the offeror reads first will count
- offeree tells offeror they’re rejecting after mailing acceptance + detrimental reliance
- time limit in options contract
when does silence constitute acceptance of a contract?
- the offer says that can count and offeree intended to accept
- if past dealings suggest it
- unilateral contract
under common law, when does acceptance w/ new terms count as acceptance?
it doesn’t - mirror image rule
under UCC, when does acceptance w/ new terms count as acceptance?
unless material changes or says accepting only if these new terms are accepted
under UCC, when acceptance included new terms from offer, which terms govern?
new terms only count if: (need all of these)
- both parties are merchants
- offer didn’t say on these terms only
- new terms aren’t material changes
- offeror doesn’t object w/in reasonable period
when does a confirming memo alter terms of an already existing oral agreement?
4 requirements:
- both parties are merchants
- offer didn’t say on these terms only
- party doesn’t object w/in reasonable time
- new terms aren’t material changes
does a gift to a charity need consideration?
no, but the promise must be in writing
elements for detrimental reliance on a contract
(promissory estoppel)
- reasonable and detrimental reliance by promisee
- foreseeable that would induce reliance
- justice requires the promise be kept
when can a contract be modified under common law?
generally only with consideration (e.g. both sides must give something up)
- exceptions:
- rescind first contract w/ outward sign (tear it up)
- unforeseen difficulties that would otherwise excuse performance
when can a contract be modified under UCC?
good faith
when can one side waive an obligation of the other side under the UCC?
you can waive it, but you can revoke your waiver unless they relied on it
when must a modification be in writing
if the modified contract would be covered by SOF
if modified contract, when can party sue for satisfaction of original obligation?
if it was an accord (versus substitute agreement). and then only if the substitute performance didn’t occur
when is a contract voidable for mutual mistake?
1) both sides mistaken about a basic material fact
2) adversely affected party didn’t assume (contemplate) risk of mistake
when is a contract void for unilateral mistake?
1) adversely affected party didn’t assume risk of mistake
2) either
- other party should have known about mistake
- other party caused the mistake
- absent the mistake the deal is unconscionable
when is a contract void for misunderstanding?
1) both interpretations were reasonable
2) actual difference of opinion existed
3) neither side was aware of the confusion
4) the term was material
when is a contract voidable by an under-age party?
always (unless ratified subsequently).
if involved a necessity, the minor might still have to pay FMV
when is a contract voidable against intoxicated person
other side must know AND you’re so intoxicated you don’t understand the nature of your actions
when is a contract voidable against someone based on mental incapacity
- if court ordered guardian over their property, then always
- if other side knew, enough that put at a disadvantage in transaction
- if other side didn’t know, only when don’t understand the nature of your actions
when is a contract void b/c of untrue statement at time of contracting?
1) material OR fraudulent
2) made under circumstances where justifiable to rely on the representation
- exception: if false fact cured
when is a contract void b/c of duress
impermissible threat
- tort, criminal prosecution, bad faith civil prosecution, threatening to breach a contract that would violate fair dealing
- also if third party caused the duress
is a contract void if made in furtherance of an illegal act?
no, only if the contract itself was illegal
is a signature required under SOF?
only party being enforced against
can an SOF writing be subsequently recorded?
yes
when is SOF satisfied via performance?
FULL performance of a service contract (unless real estate deal)
when is SOF satisfied by performance on real estate deals
need 2/3:
- possession
- improvements
- payment
are leases covered by SOF?
not if
SOF requirements for sales of goods
(only if goods >$500)
essential terms (quantity, parties)
only enforceable for quantity written down
enforceable if part-performance (delivered or paid for)
exceptions:
-custom-made goods
-judicial admission the contract existed
when are “future modification in writing” terms valid?
if only 1 party is a merchant, then must be in writing
when one side’s performance takes place over time, when is payment due?
default rule: at end of performance
venue requirements for foreign defendants?
any judicial district in the US
requirements for serving someone at their house?
leave with a person of suitable age and discretion at D’s primary adobe
does implied warranty of merchantability cover non-merchants?
no
standard for meeting implied warranty of merchantability?
fit for ordinary purposes
how waive implied warranty of merchantability
can be oral “as is” or very conspicuous if in writing
what is exception to implied warranty of merchantability?
buyer had opportunity to inspect, and reasonable inspection would have revealed the defect
standards for disclaiming implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
“as is”, conspicuous. MUST be written
what are damages if substantial (but not perfect) performance?
extra cost to fully-perform, but sometimes limited to diminution in market value (unless willfull)
when can buyer refuse delivery under UCC?
whenever there’s not perfect tender (perfect goods + perfect performance).
- must give seller a chance to cure if seller reasonably thought buyer would accept or still time left before deadline
- Exception if installment contract: then can only reject if that delivery is substantially impaired (unless seller says can cure)
- default: seller can demand payment w/ each delivery
when does risk of loss pass to buyer?
- if any breach, risk is on that party
- if third party delivery contract, depends on if destination or shipment contract (default).
- otherwise on buyer unless seller is a merchant
risk of loss if buyer repudiates before delivery?
if identified goods, then risk on buyer still for a commercially reasonable amount of time. buyer responsible for damages net of seller’s insurance.
does death by promisor excuse performance
no, unless wouldn’t make sense to continue obligation
what if the goods identified in the contract are destroyed?
if risk has passed to buyer, on the buyer.
otherwise contract is void
(assuming not the fault of one of the parties)
what can party do if other side says they will breach, before the deadline.
can sue now or wait for the deadline.
-can’t sue if you’re only waiting to get paid
when can you stop performing if you think other side might breach?
can demand assurance of performance, and if they fail to respond that counts as repudiation
limits on expectation damages
- only foreseeable damages
- try to mitigate
- must prove w/ specificity (not unproven business ventures)
if other sides breaches after you have partially performed, what are your damages?
what your profit would have been + reimbursements for your net costs.
-exception if you were giving a below-market price, and then you can get restitution
when are liquidated damages enforceable?
if amount is reasonable (judged from time of contracting) and actual damages too hard to prove
-can’t be punitive
when can seller get unpaid-for goods back from buyer?
(right of reclamation)
1) buyer insolvent
2) seller demands w/in 10 days of delivery (or reasonable term if written assurance of solvency from buyer w/in 3 months)
3) buyer must still have the goods
when can buyer get goods from seller? (equitable remedy)
- if unique goods or can’t cover
- if partial payment and either
- -seller goes insolvent w/in 10 days of receiving payment OR
- -household/personal goods
can seller disclaim damages above a certain amount for breach of warranty?
yes for commercial damages; unconscionable for personal injury damages
when can a third-party contract beneficiary prevent the parties from modifying the contract to exclude them?
reliance, they’ve assented, or they’ve tried to enforce
who gets an assignment if the assigned rights have been assigned twice?
if no consideration, the most recent one gets it
if consideration, the first assignment gets priority
are assignments revocable?
yes if no consideration
are reserve or non-reserve auctions the default?
reserve
what happens if seller makes a bid at an auction
winner can take the goods at the price of the last good-faith bid
-exception: forced sale or seller reserved the right to bid
when can a buyer insure goods?
if they’re specifically identified (e.g. crops must have been planted)
what is federal criminal jurisdiction
US citizens anywhere they are, anyone in the US, on ships and planes
what is a state’s criminal jurisdiction?
- crime occurred in the state
- out of state conduct that attempts to commit a crime in the state
- conspiracy to commit crime in other state if overt act occurred in state
when can omissions count as an actus reus?
- special relationship
- started to help and then stopped
- you caused the danger
- legal duty (e.g. paying taxes)
when is mistake of law an excuse to a crime?
- reliance on high-level govt authority
- element of the crime
- lack of notice about the law (rare)
M’Naghtan insanity defense
don’t know the nature of your act or that it is wrong
Durham Rule for insanity defense
mental defect was ‘but for’ cause of the act
MPC approach for insanity defense
lack of substantial capacity to conform conduct to the law OR don’t know the nature of your act (combines irresistible impulse with M’Naghtan)
when is voluntary intoxication a defense?
-if specific intent crime (UNLESS got intoxicated for purposes of doing the crime)
when is involuntary intoxication a defense?
anything but a strict liability crime.
involuntary intoxication: if D was forced, or unexpected reaction
under common law can accomplice be liable if principal not convicted?
no
requirements to be an accessory after the fact?
- know the felony occurred
- act with the purpose of helping the felon evade capture
requirements for conspiracy under common law?
- agreement btwn people to commit a crime
- can’t be one D and the rest people who don’t intend to go along
what crimes is accomplice liable for?
the planned crime + all crimes that are reasonably foreseeable
what are co-conspirators liable for?
the crime of conspiracy + any crime committed in furtherance of the conspiracy
withdrawal from conspiracy under common law
can’t withdraw once agreement is formed, but can cut off liability for future crimes
wharton rule
can’t have a conspiracy unless more people than needed to commit the crime (no 2 person adultery conspiracies)
what are the elements of attempt?
1) specific intent to commit a crime
2) substantial (major) step towards perpetrating the crime
requirements for accomplice liability
- helped principal before or during the crime
- had intent to help principal with the crime
- principal had to have been convicted (if common law)
when does soliciation turn into conspiracy?
if other person agrees to help
does suicide count as homicide?
no, but assisting suicide can
felonies that qualify for felony murder
BARRK
burglary; arson; robbery; rape; kidnapping
requirements for involuntary manslaughter
- unintentional homicide
- EITHER criminal negligence (very negligent, puts someone at risk of death) or during a non-BARRK unlawful act (malum in se)
elements of larceny
1) taking someone else’s property
2) without consent
3) with intent to deprive them of the property permanently
elements of embezzlement
1) D is initially in lawful possession of victim’s property, and then
2) converts that property to his own use
(must not have intended to convert from beginning)
elements of robbery
larceny by force or threat of force
-the taking of the property must be from victim’s person or in the presence of the victim (not pickpocket)
elements of extortion
larceny + threat of future harm (physical or non-physical)
does burglary need the underlying felony to succeed?
no - still guilty of burglary + attempt to commit the other felony
elements of assault
either
1) intentionally placing someone in fear of imminent bodily injury (general intent crime), OR
2) attempted (but failed) battery (specific intent, must not think the touching was consented to)
elements of kidnapping
1) holding someone against their will
2) by either moving or hiding them
- there needs to be some movement of the person, can’t just tie them in place
elements of arson at common law
maliciously burning someone’s property
- only someone else’s
- only a dwelling
- must be fire (not just smoke) + damage to structure of building
does a lie have to be material to count as perjury?
yes
elements for receipt of stolen goods
D must know they’re stolen (unreasonable mistakes of fact are a defense)
elements for larceny-by-trick
taking someone’s property after you’ve obtained their consent by fraud/deceit
- not if take title to the property
- intend to convert from the beginning
elements for larcenty by false pretenses crime
taking the title to someone else’s property after you’ve obtained their consent by misrepresentation
elements for forgery
fraudulently making a false writing that has apparent legal significance with the INTENT to defraud
standard for something to count as a 4th am seizure?
reasonable person wouldn’t feel free to leave
- must be intentional
- if suspect gets shot
requirement to do a terry stop
reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
allowable scope for a terry stop search
can only do a frisk and seize anything that’s obviously a weapon/contraband/evidence
-rationale: officer’s safety
when is a traffic checkpoint allowable?
predetermined basis for stopping cars
-only certain car-related goals permissible (sobriety, not to find drugs)
can officers enter a person’s home to arrest them with a warrant?
yes
what must a valid arrest warrant include?
name of person to be arrested + crime they’re charged with
when can officers make an arrest without a warrant?
if not felony: only if they personally witness the crime, or learned from a terry stop
when can officers enter a home to arrest without a warrant?
exigent circumstances or consent
do drug sniffing dogs constitute a search?
not on public street
expectation of privacy on your property?
yes in your backyard (curtliage to your house)
not in an open field
not garbage cans once removed to the street
standard to get a search warrant
probable cause that search will turn up
-fruits of crime, instrumentalities of crime, or evidence
requirement for search warrant contents
describe w/ particularity the place to be searched and what will be searched
when can you search without a warrant?
Exigent circumstances; search incident to arrest; consent; automobile; plain view; administrative search; stop and frisk
what is needed for exigent circumstances exception for search w/o warrant
likely immediate danger. not created by officers themselves.
suspect fleeing counts, drunk driving doesn’t
when can third parties consent to a search?
if they have apparent authority.
if co-occupant consents and you don’t, police can’t search you (if both present)
standard for warrantless automobile searches
probable cause. (worry is that car could move). can search parts of car where think the contraband might be.
also inventory search if car impounded
where can police do warrantless administrative searches?
airplane boarding areas; highly regulated industries; roadblocks for seeking information
-fire/health inspectors looking for code violations need warrants
what is scope for a search incident to arrest?
where the suspect can reach at the time of arrest (rationale: officer safety, evidence in suspect’s possession). Also DNA sample.
does 5th am protect you from giving handwriting or voice samples?
no - only testimony
when is a miranda warning required?
custodial interrogations (not free to leave and return to normal place b/c of police). exception: public safety
what can officer do if suspect says doesn’t want to answer questions?
must stop; can try again after substantial time