Summary Judgement Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Rule for SJ

A

56

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How SJ works

A

-if there is no genuine dispute of one or more material facts, the case can be resolved by applying the rule of law to those facts and arriving at a conclusion. 56a

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cases for SJ

A
Anderson
Celotex
Coble
Tolan
Matsushita
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Anderson

A
  • When determining whether a fact is material, we must look to substantive law and think what will affect the outcome of the suit?
  • Whatever evidentiary burden is applicable to those facts, and whether there is genuine dispute will be applicable when assessing whether to grant SJ
  • COURTS CANT WEIGH EVIDENCE OR ASSESS CREDIBILITY OF FACTS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Celotex

A
  • party moving for SJ has responsibility of showing court basis of its motion (if they bear burden of proof)
  • they can show court P has absence of material fact in order to establish complaint and show why there is no dispute bc something wrong w claim P offered
  • party opposing motion must offer authenticated evidence to show dispute of material facts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rule 56(c)

A
  • Codifies Celotex
  • parties moving/opposing can cite to material in the record to show materials do not establish absence/presence of genuine dispute.
  • both parties can object to facts of opposing party on grounds that they cannot be presented in an admissible form (56c2)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

56d

A

non-moving party can get more time to obtain facts through discovery if it can present facts essential to justify its opposition at that time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tolan/Coble

A

All justifiable inferences must be made in favor of nonmoving party only if there is a dispute to those facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dif b/w SJ and MTD

A
  1. MTD happens in pleadings; SJ relies on info gained in discovery.
  2. MTD moving party argues even if facts are true, P not met burden of pleading and failed to state claim; SJ argues there is no genuine dispute of material facts as indicated thru evidence and pleadings
  3. MTD happens after initial pleading; SJ usually happens after discovery concluded or up to 30 days after close of discovery
  4. MTD sought by D; SJ can be filed by any party even on P’s own claims. Court can also grant sua sponte after giving parties opportunity to be heard (56f)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Matsushita

A

Moving party must show more than some metaphysical doubt as to material facts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly