Summary - Chapter 2.2 - Burden & Standard of Proof: Criminal Cases Flashcards

1
Q

BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES

Overview

A

1) Burden of proof
2) Standard of proof
3) Meaning of BRD
4) Meaning of RD
5) Duty of judges
6) Exception - proving particular facts under S.103
7) Exception - statutory defence under S.105
8) Exception - proving facts specially within knowledge S.106

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES

Burden of proof

A

1) On whom:

Woolmington v DPP; Balachandran v PP;
Mohamad Radhi Yaakob v PP.

2) Falsity of defence:

  • Mohamad Radhi Yaakob v PP
  • PP v Saimin
  • Mat v PP
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES

Standard of proof

A

PP v Yuvaraj

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES

Meaning of BRD

A

Miller v Minister of Pensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES

Meaning of RD

A

1) PP v Saimin - hesitates;
2) Ali Tan Abdullah v PP - mere denial or bare story of innocence not RD;
3) PP v Datuk Haji Harun Idris - fanciful or imaginary doubt not RD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES

Duty of judge

A

Mat v PP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

EXCEPTION - PROVING PARTICULAR FACTS UNDER S.103

Alibi

A

1) The law:

  • Illustration (b), S.103 EA
  • S.402A CPC

2) Relevancy of alibi:
- Illustration (a), S.11 EA
3) Application - Duis Akim & Ors v PP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

EXCEPTION - PROVING STATUTORY DEFENCES UNDER S.105

General principles

A

1) SOP - Murugapillai a/l Rengasamy v PP
2) Two types of defences - R v Chanderasekara
3) Failure to prove defence - R v Chanderasekara

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

EXCEPTION - PROVING STATUTORY DEFENCES UNDER S.105

examples of defences

A

1) provocation - Ikau Anak Mail v PP
- Recent, PP v Sah Chin Chong (CA, 2018)
2) Insanity - PP v Kenneth Fook Mun Lee (No. 1
- However, PP v Aldwin Rojas Saz (CA, 2019).
3) Automatism - Abdul Razak bin Dalek v PP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

EXCEPTION - PROVING FACTS SPECIALLY WITHIN KNOWLEDGE UNDER S.106

Meaning of specially

A

PP v Lim Kwai Thean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

EXCEPTION - PROVING FACTS SPECIALLY WITHIN KNOWLEDGE UNDER S.106

example - dispelling dishonesty

A

Mary Ng v R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly