Summary - Chapter 2.2 - Burden & Standard of Proof: Criminal Cases Flashcards
BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES
Overview
1) Burden of proof
2) Standard of proof
3) Meaning of BRD
4) Meaning of RD
5) Duty of judges
6) Exception - proving particular facts under S.103
7) Exception - statutory defence under S.105
8) Exception - proving facts specially within knowledge S.106
BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES
Burden of proof
1) On whom:
Woolmington v DPP; Balachandran v PP;
Mohamad Radhi Yaakob v PP.
2) Falsity of defence:
- Mohamad Radhi Yaakob v PP
- PP v Saimin
- Mat v PP
BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES
Standard of proof
PP v Yuvaraj
BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES
Meaning of BRD
Miller v Minister of Pensions
BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES
Meaning of RD
1) PP v Saimin - hesitates;
2) Ali Tan Abdullah v PP - mere denial or bare story of innocence not RD;
3) PP v Datuk Haji Harun Idris - fanciful or imaginary doubt not RD
BURDEN & STANDARD OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL CASES
Duty of judge
Mat v PP
EXCEPTION - PROVING PARTICULAR FACTS UNDER S.103
Alibi
1) The law:
- Illustration (b), S.103 EA
- S.402A CPC
2) Relevancy of alibi:
- Illustration (a), S.11 EA
3) Application - Duis Akim & Ors v PP
EXCEPTION - PROVING STATUTORY DEFENCES UNDER S.105
General principles
1) SOP - Murugapillai a/l Rengasamy v PP
2) Two types of defences - R v Chanderasekara
3) Failure to prove defence - R v Chanderasekara
EXCEPTION - PROVING STATUTORY DEFENCES UNDER S.105
examples of defences
1) provocation - Ikau Anak Mail v PP
- Recent, PP v Sah Chin Chong (CA, 2018)
2) Insanity - PP v Kenneth Fook Mun Lee (No. 1
- However, PP v Aldwin Rojas Saz (CA, 2019).
3) Automatism - Abdul Razak bin Dalek v PP
EXCEPTION - PROVING FACTS SPECIALLY WITHIN KNOWLEDGE UNDER S.106
Meaning of specially
PP v Lim Kwai Thean
EXCEPTION - PROVING FACTS SPECIALLY WITHIN KNOWLEDGE UNDER S.106
example - dispelling dishonesty
Mary Ng v R