Substituted benzenes Flashcards
Fast rate of electrophilic substitution?
The slower step is the formation of an intermediate carbocation by reaction of the benzene ring with an electrophile the lower the energy of the transition state leading to the carbocation the lower the activation energy and the faster the rate of electrophilic substitution
How to predict the effect of an existing substituent on the rate of electrophilic substitution?
Need to consider whether R stabilises or destabilises the transition state leading to the carbocation
How can you use Hammonds postulate?
For each reaction the transition state leading to the carbocation is closer in energy to the carbocation than to the reactants using Hammonds postulate you can assume that the structure of the transition state resembles the structure of the carbocation in each reaction so the stabilities of the intermediate carbocations can be used to explain the different rates of electrophilic substitution reacts of substituted benzenes, the more stable the intermediate carbocation the faster the rate of electrophilic substitution
Activating groups?
Substituents that stabilise the carbocation make the ring more reactive toe electrophilic substitution than benzene and are called activating groups
Deactivating groups?
Substituents that destabilise the carbocation make the ring less reactive to electrophilic substitution than benzene and are called deactivating groups
What are activating groups?
Groups that donate electrons into the benzene ring by positive inductive effects or positive mesomeric effects, electron donating groups increase the reactivity of the ring to reaction with electrophile because the carbocation is stabilised by electron donating groups.
Common activating groups?
- NH2, -NHR, -NR2, -OH, -OR, -O-, -NHCOR,
- OCOR, -Ph, -CH=CH2, -R
How to activating groups stabilise the ring?
+M effects are stronger than +I effects so electron donating groups with + M effect stabilise the carbocation more effectively than electron donating groups with +I effect. =NH2 group has + M effects and is a strong electron snort whereas the -Me groups has a +I effect and is a weaker electron donor, this explains why aniline reacts faster with electrophile than toluene, electron donating groups with strong +M effects stabilise carbocations more effectively than electron donating groups with weaker +M effects
What are deactivating groups?
Withdraw electrons from the benzene ring by negative inductive effects -I or negative mesomeric effects -M. Electron withdrawing groups decrease the reactivity of the ring to reaction with electrophiles because the carbocation is destabilised by electron withdrawing groups
Common deactivating groups?
- Cl, -Br, -I, -CHO, -COR, -CO2H, -CO2R,
- SO3H, -NO2, -NR3+
How to deactivating groups destabilise the ring?
Electron withdrawning groups with -M effects destabilise carbocations more effectively than electron withdrawing groups with -I effects because -M effects are stronger than -I effects. NO2 group has a -M effect and is a strong electron acceptor whereas the Cl group has a -I effect and is a weaker electron acceptor. This explains why chlorobenzene reacts faster with electrophiles than nitrobenzene. The strongest electron withdrawing groups include SO3H and NO2 groups. These groups contain three or four highly electronegative atoms that exert a strong -I effect and have at least one polar double bond that accepts a pair of electrons and so exerts a strong -M effect that is strong -I and -M effects reinforce one another
Ortho?
2 position
Meta?
3 position
Para?
4 position
Electron donating activating positons?
Electron donating groups direct electrophile to the 2 and 4 positions
Electron withdrawing deactivating positons?
Electron withdrawing groups direct electrophiles to the 3 positions
Exception of halogens?
When the groups is Cl, Br or I electrophiles are directed to the 2 and 4 positions even though these groups are deactivating
Why are activating groups 2,4 directing activators?
all activating substituents with positive inductive +I and positive mesomeric +M effects direct the incoming electrophile to the 2 and 4 positions of the ring this is because the intermediate carbocation is stabilised by the +I or +M effect of the activating substituent, whereas introducing the electrophile at the 3 positions produces an intermediate carbocation that cannot be effectively stabilised by the +I and +M effect of the activating substituent, because carbocations formed from attack at the 2 and 4 positions are the more stable electrophilic substitutions at these positions will have lower Gibbs energy of activation