Subject Matter Jurisdiction Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Subject Matter Jurisdiction

A

“court’s power to hear a case because of the nature of the dispute, as distinct from its power to enter a judgment against a particular defendant”, focuses on which court system, as opposed to which state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Title 28, §1331: Federal Question Jurisdiction

A

District courts have original jurisdiction over actions arising from the constitution, laws or treaties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Title 28, §1332: Diversity Jurisdiction

A

District courts have jurisdiction over cases with complete diversity and a value greater than $75,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Title 28, §1441(a): Removal

A

Defendant may remove a civil case from state court to federal court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Title 28, §1441(b)(2): Hometown Defendant Rule

A

Defendant cannot remove if they are a citizen of the forum state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Title 28, §1446(a): Removal Notice

A
  • Removal notice must contain a “short and plain statement of the grounds for removal”
  • Defendant who provides untrue information risks Rule 11 sanctions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Title 28, §1446(b)(1) and (3)

A
  • Defendant must file removal notice within 30 days of receiving complaint or
  • Within 30 days of receiving amended pleading
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Title 28, §1446(c)(2)

A

Amount a plaintiff sues is the amount in controversy, even if could sue for more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley

A

Well-pleaded complaint rule: the plaintiff must put forward a federal question in the complaint to establish federal question jurisdiction. It is not enough for the court to anticipate a defense which may contain a federal question. This rule is conclusive/a bright line.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hertz Corp. v. Friend

A

In the context of subject matter jurisdiction, the ‘principal place of business’ means “the place where a corporation’s officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation’s activities” - the ‘nerve center’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Federal Question ‘Arising Under’ Jurisdiction

A

Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over any case in which the plaintiff or defendant raises a question of federal law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Establishing Federal Question Jurisdiction

A

Holmes’ Creation Test: federal law expressly gives rise to the cause of action
OR
1. There is a substantial federal question in the claims of the plaintiff and
2. Federal question is serious and important and
3. Federal court is not overwhelmed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Complete Diversity Requirements for Subject Matter Jurisdiction

A
  • Citizen A v. Citizen B
  • Citizen A v. Foreign Citizen
  • Citizen A and Foreign Citizen v. Citizen B
  • Citizen A v. Citizen B and Foreign Citizen
  • Foreign State v. Citizen A
  • No plaintiff may be a citizen of the same state as any defendant (no similarities across v. but within is ok)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

State Citizenship for Individuals

A
  1. US citizen
  2. Domiciled in state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Domicile

A
  1. Physical presence
  2. Intent to remain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

State Citizenship for Corporations

A
  1. Incorporated in the state
  2. Principal place of business
17
Q

Amount in Controversy Requirements

A

Plaintiff must sue for more than $75,000.

18
Q

Adding Amounts in Controversy
1. 1 plaintiff v. 1 defendant
2. 1 plaintiff v. multiple defendants
3. Multiple plaintiffs v. 1 defendant

A
  1. Add plaintiff’s claim amounts together, even if unrelated
  2. Cannot add claims and the plaintiff must meet the minimum for each individual defendant
  3. Cannot add claims unless the plaintiffs are enforcing a single title or if the claims arise from the same occurrence and at least one plaintiff can satisfy the minimum
19
Q

Moving Between Courts

A