Subject 4 Part 2 Flashcards

Securing the accuseds attendence in court

1
Q

Arrest with a warrant

Who can execute a warrant of arrest?

A

= peace officer In terms of s 1 definition in CPA:
peace officer includes –
- Magistrate
- Justice of peace
- Police official
- Correctional official as defined in s 1 of Correctional Services Act
- Any person who is granted this power in terms of s 334(1) notice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Arrest with a warrant

What type of exemption from liability does s46 +s331 of the CPA provide for?

A

1.make provision for exemption from liability of person who is authorized to execute/assist in execution of warrant of arrest & who in reasonable belief that they are arresting person mentioned in warrant arrests another

2.who acts under warrant which is invalid due to defect in substance or form (provided that there is no knowledge of defect)

(Show a warrant of arrest upon demand)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Arrests without a warrant

When can a PO make an arrest without a warrant ito sec 40+41?

ONLY PEACE OFFICERS+PRIVATE PERSONS CAN DO THIS

A

A.peace officer can make arrest where person -* Commits/attempts to commit offence in their presence
= if peace officer sees crime taking place they have wider power to make arrest

B.* Is reasonably suspected of having committed offence referred to in schedule
1 .Schedule 1 offences in CPA = serious offences
= if peace officer makes arrest based on reasonable suspicion they have narrower
power to make arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Arrest without a warrant

What did the Fubesi+Duncan case state regarding PO’s making arrests without warrants?

A

F= peace officer cannot arrive @ reasonable suspicion based on 2 conflicting versions of events

D== test for reasonable suspicion is whether on objective grounds peace officer has reasonable grounds for suspicion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Arrest without a warrant

What information does s41 provide that a PO must take when affecting an arrest?

A
  • If peace officer has power of arrest can ask name + address of person being
    arrested
  • Person suspected of having committed/having attempted to commit offence
    -If not schedule 1 offence → peace officer cannot make address but can still obtain
    name + address of Witness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Arrest without a warrant

What if a suspect refuses to provide their name to the PO ito s41?

A

deemed offence
= can then be arrested on basis of this refusal
- Reasonable suspicion that person gives peace officer false name/address/both → peace officer may arrest without warrant & detain for period of not exceeding 12 hours until their name/address/both has been verified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Arrest by private persons without a warant

Under which circumstances can a private person make an arrest ito s42?

A

A.* Schedule 1 offence committed in their presence OR on reasonable suspicion
that person committed schedule 1 offence
Private person can only make arrest in terms of schedule 1

B.* Assisting POwho has authority to effect arrest
* Statute provides authority for private persons to make arrest
* See person engaged in fight
* Owner of property can make arrest where
person is committing an offence on their property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Duty to arrest

What is the duty to arrest ito s47(1)?

A

→ every male inhabitant of SA between ages of 16-60 when called upon by police official to do so = is required to assist such police official in arresting + detaining person

    • s 47(2) of CPA = failure to render assistance is offence punishable by
      fine/imprisonment for period not exceeding 3 months

Mgwenya case
= lameness may exempt accused from criminal liability in terms of s 47(2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the Mathebe case state regarding the non-compliance with the 4 pillars of a lawful arrest?

A

= where 4 pillars for lawful arrest are not present then is no lawful arrest → so
resisting arrest/escaping is not considered unlawful
= if person is subsequently rearrested after escape → this amounts to assault +
person will have civil claim against arrester

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Proceedure after arrest

What is the procedure after effecting an arrest?

A

Ensure arrested person is in custody of SAPS as soon as possible & then can be detained by police for period not exceeding 48 hours
-48hrs runs after the person arrives at the police station

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does s35(1)(d) of the constitution determine the 48hr window?

A

Everyone who is arrested for allegedly committing offence has right –
1.broght before a court ASAP,not later than
2.48hrs after the arrest
-end of the first court day after the expiry of 48hrs , if 48hrs expires outside ordinary court hours on a day that isn’t an ordinary court day

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did the Tyokwana case state regarding unlawful detention?

A

General rule = where person is unlawfully arrested → their detention after arrest will
so be deemed unlawful

Exception = if magistrate decides that person unlawfully arrested must stay in
custody → then detention is deemed lawful & will be entitled to remedy in terms of s
35(2)(d) of Constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How can the 48hr period be extended according to s501(1) of the CPA?

A
  • If 48 hour period expires on day which is not court day OR on any court day
    after 4pm = 48 hour period is deemed to expire on next court day before 4pm

– If 48 hour period expires when arrestee is outside jurisdiction of court & @ time of expiry is in transit from place of detention to court = 48 hour period expires @ 4pm on next court day after day on which arrestee was brought into court’s area of jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did the Hoco case provide for regarding the expiry of the 48hr period?

A

= court held that 48 hour period must expire while arrestee is in transit (not before are transported) in order for 48 hour period to be extended

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who is an awaiting trial prisoner?

A

= person who is arrested + in detention while awaiting trial - Such person has not been convicted by court of law & must therefore be presumed to be innocent
- Awaiting trial prisoners in detention of DCS are detained separately from
prisoners who have been convicted + sentenced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Resisting arrests and attempts to flee

When can force be used when affecting an arrest?

A

necessary to overcome resistance to
arrest OR to prevent suspect from fleeing

17
Q

What did the Govender case state regarding the use of force in affecting an arrest?

A

proportionality test is too narrow in referring to seriousness of offence → it should refer to all circumstances in which force is used
= looking @ all circumstances in which force is used creates rational + equitable way of balancing interests

  • How has this case had effect on s 49?
    = seriousness of offence + all circumstances surrounding offence must be taken into to determine whether use of force is justified
18
Q

How has the Wlaters case changed the use of force in s49 when affecting an arrest?

A

= previous s 49(2) allowed for use of deadly force to effect arrest → court declared
this provision to be unconstitutional

NOW restricts use of deadly force when affecting an arrest

19
Q

What did the Koning case state regarding the use of force when affecting an arrest?

A

= accused who was warder of team of convicts & had reasonable suspicion that 1 of prisoners was trying to escape – he shot + killed prisoner to prevent him from
escaping
= court held that killing prisoner was by no means only way of preventing escape eg.
accused could have used his whistle, warned deceased

20
Q

What are the requirements for the use of deadly force when affecting an arrest in s49(2)(a)+(b) of the CPA?

A
  • Suspect poses serious threat of violence to arrester or any other person
  • Person is suspected on reasonable grounds of having committed crime
    involving infliction/threatened infliction of serious bodily harm & there are no
    other reasonable means of effecting arrest
21
Q

What does s51 provide for with regards to a suspects escape from lawful custody?

A

person who has been arrested + being in lawful custody, but who is not yet lodged in prison/police cell/lock-up & who escapes from such custody is guilty of offence

22
Q

What is the effect of an arrest through the use of a dog?

A

Using dog to effect arrest can never be seen as minimum amount of force used →
thus effecting arrest by means of dog must be approached with caution

23
Q

Other methods of securing an accuseds attendance in court

What is a release on warning ito s72?

A

Who can issue warning to appear in court?
= police
= court
Where accused is in custody →police/court can release accused from custody &
warn them to appear before specified court @ specified time on specified date

=Warning is least intrusive way to secure attendance of accused in court