Study 1-10: Narrative Questions Flashcards
Explain what a nuisance is. Describe public nuisance and private nuisance and give ONE (1) example of each.
- Nuisance: In law, a class of wrong that arises out of unreasonable, unwarranted, or unlawful use by a person of his own property
- Public nuisance: An action or a thing that interferes with the general public. It interferes with the public as a class, not merely with one person or a group of citizens
- Example: A neighbour stores and sells explosive fireworks from his garage in a residential area
- Private nuisance: An unlawful interference of a person’s enjoyment and use of his or her land
- Example: A neighbour plays music loudly in the middle of the night, disturbing the sleep and enjoyment of her neighbour’s home
Explain how criminal law differs from civil law.
- Criminal Law
- A crime is an act against society
-
Criminal Code lists acts against society
- prohibited by Criminal Code
- or certain federal or provincial/territorial statutes
- Seeks to determine guilt
- Demands punishment by imprisonment or fine
- Civil law
- Lawsuits arise from private disputes
- Individuals or corporations may sue or be sued
- Injured party usually looks for monetary compensation
- Civil court is concerned with setting appropriate compensation for damages suffered
- Ensures the at-fault party pays compensation to the injured party
- Civil law seeks to assign fault
- Civil law and criminal law are not mutually exclusive
- A person found not guilty of a crime may still face a lawsuit on the same issue
- Standards of proof are not as high in civil law matters
Outline the hierarchy applied to the law of precedent.
Precedent and statute law
- Statute law comes into effect when parliament and provincial/territorial legislatures pass laws into written form
- Statute law is derived from legal principles and criteria are developed by common law
- Statute law is response to a rapidly changing society; supersedes case law when in conflict with the other if the statute covers the point in dispute
- Under common law, courts look to previous cases for guidance on how to resolve current ones
- Research is conducted by lawyers and judges to determine which previous cases are similar in circumstances to their own; when past cases direct the outcome of cases that follow, they set precedence
Explain how a reasonable person is described in the legal case of Arland v. Taylor.
The reasonable person is NOT
- an extraordinary or unusual creature
- superhuman
- required to display the highest skill of which anyone is capable
- a genius who can perform unusual feats
- possessed of unusual powers of foresight
Outline the circumstances in which parents are responsible for the negligence of their children.
Parents’ liability
- The child was acting on the parents’ express instructions or under their authority
- The child was employed by the parent
- and acting within the scope of the employment
- Damage was caused by a dangerous thing, such as a motor vehicle
- or by an animal that the parents allowed the child to control
Name the Supreme Court of Canada case that set out the rules to follow in order to prove a negligence claim based on the breach of a statute. Outline the rules.
- Right of Canada v. Saskatchewan Wheat Pool
- The statute must have been breached
- The conduct that was a breach of the statute must also have caused the damage for which compensation is sought
- The statute must have been intended to prevent the damage that occurred
- The person making the claim must be among the group the statute was intended to protect
Name FIVE (5) defences someone can use to defend him- or herself when accused of committing a tort.
- Denial
- Remoteness of damage
- Inevitable accident
- No duty owed
- Emergency
- Act of God
- Voluntary assumption of risk
- Contributory negligence
Outline the type of cases where strict liability has been applied.
- Fire or large volumes of water used for industrial or transportation purposes
- Commercial use of or commercial quantities of gas and electricity
- Use of poisonous gases in fumigation
- Spraying of herbicides
- Keeping wild animals or domestic animals with known vicious tendencies
State the exceptions defendants can use to be excused from strict liability.
- Act of God
- Escape caused by the plaintiff’s own actions
- Escape by the deliberate wrongful act of a third party
- When the dangerous object is on the defendant’s land with the implied or express consent of the plaintiff
- When the authorization to bring and keep the dangerous object on the defendant’s land is granted by statute
Outline the FIVE (5) categories that the CCQ Articles 1457 to 1469 can be roughly divided into.
- Liability for one’s own act or fault
- Liability for others’ acts
- Liability for damages caused by one’s things and buildings
- Liability for damages cause by one’s animals
- Liability of the manufacturer
Explain the duty of the Good Samaritan according to Quebec’s Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms.
- Every human being whose life is in peril has the right to assistance
- Every person must come to the aid of anyone whose life is in peril
- either personally or by calling for aid
- By giving the person the necessary and immediate physical assistance
- unless it involves danger to himself or to a third person or there is another valid reason
Outline the guidelines the Civil Code of Québec provides for litigants as to what damages can be claimed in cases of extra-contractual liability or contractual liability.
- Plaintiff can sue for bodily injury
- Material damage
- Moral prejudice
- Damages expressed in monetary terms
- Moral damages have been used to compensate solatium doloris (the harm felt by a spouse or relative of a deceased party) and also to compensate the plaintiff in cases of nervous shock.
Explain how the denial defence is interpreted according to the Civil Code of Québec.
Generally, when the requirements to establish a lawsuit are not met, they serve as the denial defence against the lawsuit and include the following:
- Denial of fault: There is no fault on the part of the defendant
- Denial of injury: There is no injury suffered by the plaintiff
- Denial of causal link: There is no causal link between the fault and the injury
- When the plaintiff is not able to establish the defendant’s fault, the plaintiff’s own injury, or the causal link between the fault and the injury, the lawsuit will not succeed
Explain how the voluntary assumption of risk defence is interpreted according to the Civil Code of Québec.
- CCQ Article 1477 outlines the benefit to the plaintiff
- The plaintiff’s assumption of the risk is not a complete defence
- Liability will be assessed according to the circumstances of the incident
- The defendant must rely on other defences to avoid a finding of fault
- If responsibility for the wrongful act is shared, then liability will be apportioned accordingly
Explain how the Civil Code of Québec interprets defences for manufacturers.
- CCQ Article 1473
- Manufacturer of a moveable thing is not bound to make reparation for injury caused by
- a safety defect in the thing
- If he proves that the victim knew or could have known of the defect
- or could have foreseen the injury