Stuarts And The Civil War Flashcards
How had Charles alienated the people/parliament during personal rule?
- religion
- finance
- foreign policy
- absolutism
What was the anti court consensus and who/what were the leaders and aims?
- party opposed to the king’s policies
- lead by John pym, with assistance from vane and St. John
- aims included stopping slide to Catholicism, punish king’s advisors (laud, Stratford, windibank), remove prerogative courts (star chamber), remove financial innovations (ship money) and restore old constitutional balance - NOT regicide and republicanism
Parliamentarian demands after personal rule as leading to the civil war
- ended ship money/ other financial methods
- star chamber and high commission went
- triennial act passed
- strafford impeached and executed
Later.. demanded Charles accept such things as ten propositions and 19 propositions and grand remonstrance
Why were the constitutional royalists formed?
- parliament insisting on appointing king’s advisors, commanders of castles and education of royal children. The 19 promos wanted control of military and root + branch petition wanted end of bishops. Parliament began to seem tyrannical
- led by sir Edward Hyde, Falkland and digby
5 members coup 5th jan 1642 as leading to civil war
- In response to rumour Henrietta Maria would be impeached, Charles marched into House of Commons, proving his catholic and absolutist sentiments, as was appointment of Thomas Lunsford as lieutenant of Tower of London.
- parliament insisted Lunsford be removed and the king obliged
Scottish incident in the road to the civil war
•earl of Montrose attempts to control section of army increased parliament distrust of Charles, though he was out of London at this point
Charles responsibility in leading to civil war
- inconsistent in terms of parliament issues. Accepted triennial act, end of ship money and forest fines, star chamber and execution of strafford,
- but rejected 10 propos, 19 propos and grand remonstrance, causing parliament to push further. Rejection of 19 propos leads to parliament creating the committee of public safety
- did not appoint Essex to lead army in Ireland. This causes him to be on parliament’s side during war, depriving Charles of skilled general who fought in 30 yrs war
Other factors contributing to civil war
- duke of Bedford death, had been negotiating betw pym and Charles
- poor harvest and trade in 1642 led to riots and radical preaching and gentry arming themselves. Charles was in the north whilst parliament was in London, so it was unclear who was in charge
- propaganda of royalist and anti-royalist pamphlets began appearing, causing many to join sides
The Irish rebellion Oct/nov 1641 as contributing to the civil war
- an army would be needed to suppress it but parliament did not trust Charles with one which angered him
- rebels in Ireland claimed that they were supporting the king, which added to belief that Charles was catholic.
- Charles refused to appoint Essex, depriving him of an ally and irritating parliament
The outbreak of the civil war
- Charles declares war on parliament on the 22nd August 1642 from Nottingham
- parliament err, stating that people who do not support parliament will be classed as delinquents
The two sides and advantages during the civil war 1642-1646
•Charles - raised army and had better cavalry
- commanded by prince Rupert, skilled commander
-had to rely on gifts for money and finance was therefore an issue and Charles was not in a position to finance a long war.
-Dominated north and west of England. -15,000 men initially
•parliament - had navy under earl of Warwick, therefore had control of trade and transporting troops, and prevent potential Irish Catholic royalists from landing
-had control of London and east anglia, south and east, which was more wealthy and populated than north.
-pym’s system of tax collecting and compounding allowed for better finances for a long war
-15,000 men initially
Opening shots of civil war
- king suffered setback by not capturing hull. First death in Manchester
- Charles slowly moved on London w army of 10,000, opposite Essex under parliamentary side
Earl of Essex
•military experience, Fought in 30 yrs war •supported peace •unsure about fighting king •lost 6000 men as prisoners at lostwithiel
Prince Rupert
- fought in 30 yrs war
- brilliant tactician and military commander
- lost control of cavalry at naseby
- ruthless, as seen in slaughter @ Bolton in 1644
- fought and won at battle of edge hill in October 1642
Battle of edge hill October 23rd 1642
- first pitched battle. Both sides claimed victory
- royalists under prince Rupert and parliamentarians under Essex. Royalist cavalry superior whilst parliament had better infantry
- Essex forced to withdraw leaving oath to London open but Charles was too slow. 24,000 londoners has built defences in the delay and Charles was forced not to attack at Turnham Green and withdrew to oxford which meant the war would continue to the next year
1643 during the war
•Charles aimed for 3 pronged attack - Newcastle moving south through Yorkshire
-hopton to Kent
- main force to London
• Newcastle won @ Walton mood, gaining control of entire north. Hampton successful in south but undisciplined troops wouldn’t advance further (localism, detriment to royalists). Charles delayed London’s and later siege to Gloucester
•Cromwell formed Ironsides - a well disciplined and trained cavalry
•Charles made cessation treaty in Ireland whilst parliament agreed to solemn league and covenant with the Scots (establishment of Presbyterian church after victory
•Scots under earl of leven pushes Newcastle into York. Rupert came for relief but was trapped by leven and eastern association army leading to marston moor in 1644
Marston moor 2nd July 1644
- royalists under Rupert trapped between 3 parliamentary forces and Scotland
- royalists completely defeated, king lost north and York surrendered to parliament
Why did the civil war last so long?
- poor leadership - royalists saw feud betw digby and Rupert and goring didn’t follow orders - parliamentarians saw Essex and Manchester acting on their own
- eg in marston moor, Essex and Waller wouldn’t work together (Essex beaten in lostwithel in West 6,000). Manchester also missed chance to destroy royalists after 2nd battle of Newbury
Self denying ordinance
- failure of command saw removal of Essex and Manchester and dispute betw war and peace party
- Cromwell in war, independents, appeared radical. Manchester in peace, political Presbyterian, did not want to defeat king or overthrow him.
- peace party defeated in house of commons, issued self deny ordinance, which states that no MP could be commander (except Cromwell)
Creation of the new model army 1644/1645
- NMA creates under command Of sir Thomas fairfax. Cromwell controlled cavalry. Skippan (influential Puritan) controlled infantry. Henry Irbton also had position
- promotion was based on merit not birth and the NMA became a disciplined and professional force that did not suffer from localism as the royalists did.
- independent religion spread through the army (belief in toleration, hostile to Anglicanism and Presbyterianism)
- NMA were militarily aggressive but religiously more tolerant, whilst Presbyterians were more passive militarily but more intolerant religiously