structure v action Flashcards
structural approaches
feminism - conflict
functionalism - consensus
marxism - conflict
combination of structure and action
neo-marxism - humanistic Gramsi, structural Althusser
social action theory - weber
structuration theory - giddens
action theory
symbolic
interactionism
postmodernism
ethonomethodology
structural theories
argue individuals are constrained by social structures
structures are external to use - they exist before us and continue on after us
makes behaviour patterned and predictable at a macro level
social structure heavily influences and directs human behaviour and opportunities
structural theories eval
reification - assume society is an actual thing that exists independently of human action
seen as deterministic providing people with little free will
social action theories
micro-level, bottom-up approaches that focus on the actions and interactions of individuals
individuals are seen as having free will and choice
individuals shape society through their choices, meanings and actions
shared symbols help people to negotiate and interact with one another
social action evaluations
struggles to properly explain conflict and power differentials in society
fails to explain the origins of inequality - origin of labels
at times focuses too much on individual and fails to explain the connections between social structure and individual behaviour
bridging the divide
Max Weber
- first to develop a strong social approach - Max Weber regularly utilised structural arguments alongside social action
- sociological explanations need to take both structure and action into account
structure - because objective structural factors shape people’s behaviour
action - because individuals attach subjective meanings to actions
show ideas and values also shaped human development
protestant values created a form of behaviour then shaped the economic system which proceeds to shape culture behaviours
bridging the divide evaluation
Weber himself acknowledged that he had not quite succeeded in solving the debate - sometimes he wrote in terms of structure, other in terms of social action and verstehen
structuration theory
Giddens
- attempted to recast and solve debate
- no social laws in social life - people are knowledgeable about world and people create and reproduce existing social structures
- not separate - duality of structure
- we draw upon various resources and that we use these to work alongside and subvert rules
- however, we can also change how we use language thus altering the structure and rules of language
structuration theory evolution
- criticised for merely repeating Weber’s theory and has done little but changed the language used
- accused of redefining the question as rules and resources are arguably very distinct from structure and action - rather than answering the dilemma set, he merely answered a different question
- defined with theoretical rigour how social action works rather than structure and action as his model has little to say about how constraining social structures work and operate