exam questions Flashcards
sociology should be a science
Positivism - can be as social world is patterned - causal laws - quantitative methods - allow replicate methods of natural sciences - reliable objective data - using logic and methods of natural sciences - produces empirical evidence, generalise laws of cause and effect to solve social problems, durkehim, comte
Karl popper, Hawkings, black swan theory - falsifiable eg whether video games cause violence, experimental method, hypothetic-deductive method - sociology can be scientific by using this method - should be about falsifying a theory
sociology should not be a science
Feminism - cannot and should not - malestream view and understanding of the world, science searched for single absolute truths - a single scientific feminist theory would privilege the view of some groups of women over others - oakley - cannot be a science as needs to have more informal approach
Postmodernism - ian angell, lyotard, the big bang, ethnography, science is a metanarrative, ethonography - the way experts try to establish order is not possible making it irrelevant due to how fragmented society is
value freedom
traditional positivists - comte and durkheim
- model itself on logic of natural sciences - only look at what is directly observable - follow methods of natural scientists which allows detachment eg Durkheim’s suicide study used official stats - hard data - little room for subjectivity
marx - role of sociology is to reveal the truth and scientific methods achieve this - marx used method of historical analysis to discover truth about society eg development of human society ends in communism
value laden
postmodernism - world consists of diversity of individuals including sociologists - no way of judging whether view is truer than others - any perspective that claims to have truth is just a metanarrative - no absolute truths just a multiplicity of truths - value free process itself is based on a set of values
feminism - Ann Oakley - only by taking an active part in the research process can sociologists gain truth of those they research - sociologists should be reflexive as shown - open mind - her own research into motherhood where interviewed first-time mothers before and after childbirth - empathy - reflexivity - openly reflecting upon the ways in which our own values, experiences and beliefs have been shaped
sociology should be in policy research
comte and durkheim - sociology should use science and reason to discover cause of social problems and provide solutions to solve them - part of enlightenment of social progress - Comte - sociology as a practical subject should be applied to wider society - ideas to reinforce social order and direct social progress - Durkheim - sociology provides ways of restoring order and strengthens integrations - state - serves the interests of society as a whole - social policies help everyone eg nuclear family
political left - left realists - social democratic view - new labour - 1997 - 2010 - sociologists actively involved in social policy recommendations - help eradicate social problems eg social exclusions - Townsed - identified extent and causes of poverty in UK - survey of over 2000 households - findings to recommend policies - black report- 1980 - 37 policy recommendations for reducing class-inequalities in health
objectivity
positivists - sociologists should adopt the research process of natural scientists, where a hypothesis is tested in a systematic and controlled way - quantitative data to find and measure patterns of behaviour - detached - functionalism
subjectivity
structure
macro approach
structural theories believe society is out there
functionalism - Focuses on the needs of the social system as a whole.
• All the main features of society (from institutions like the family, the language we speak and the behavioural patterns of individuals) are a response to those needs.
• A consensus theory: Sees society as based on a basic agreement among its members about values, goals and rules.
• A modernist theory, sharing the goals of the Enlightenment.
• Believes that we can obtain true knowledge of the functioning of society and that this knowledge can be used to improve society.
marxism - structural marxism - state functions to serve the long-term interests of the bourgeoisie - passes on capitalistic values to the working class to allow for exploitation - structure of capitalism affects the behaviour of individuals - individuals are the product of the class relationships with capitalism - superstructure - marx - role is to pass on dominant ideology to reinforce capitalist values
Providing:
• An awareness of cultural differences
• Self-awareness and understanding
Reflecting on:
• Experiences (eg domestic violence, sex discrimination)
action
micro approach
symbolic interactionism - Blumer - people act in accordance to meanings attached - actions are partly predictable because we internalise expectatinos of others but not fixed as room for negotiation - Cooley - develop sense of ourselves by interpreting messages we receive from others - looking glass self
labelling theory - the labels people give to others influence their self-concepts - Becker interactionism - positive or negative labels can result in a self-fulfilling prophecy - eg education working class kids more likely to be labelled as failures and deviance so labelling by authorities can lead to a deviant career and master status
Can empower people to change their lives
Form pressure groups
Criticise existing policies and suggest new policies
Exert pressure on governments to implement new policies
social action theory - weber
social action - action carried out by individual to which a person attached a meaning
- unconscious reaction cannot be social action
social action - an action that account for the existence and possible reactions of others in society
developed concept of verstehen action - four different types - affection action, traditional action, instrumental rational reaction and value rational reaction
level of cause - explaining the objective structural factors shaping people’s behaviour
level of meaning - understanding the subjective meanings individuals attach to actions
structuration theory - giddens
attempted to recast and solve the structure action debate
argued no social laws in social life - people are knowledgeable about the world and people create and reproduce existing social structures
not separate - duality of structure - we draw upon various resources that we use these to work alongside - using them to subvert rules
rules can shape our access to resources but resources can be used to change rules
humanistic - neo-marxism
Gramsci - bourgeoisie maintain domination in two ways - coercion use of force or consent propagating ideologies
- do not see domination of bourgeoisie as total and monolithic
hegemony unlikely ever be complete
rather than monolithin and all powerful - bourgeoisie often divided and too few so need to form alliance to create powerful bloc - rather than brainwashed into passive false consciousness - proletariat have dual conscious - one reflect bourgeoise ideology and other reflect exploitation of daily life - disagree that economic forces along bring revolutionary change - as long as proletariat accept hegemony then no revolution
to bring revolution marxists need to win hearts by connecting to popular culture for alliances to form to construct counter-hegemonic bloc
then can become organic intellectuals - Leveson inquiry news international and phone hacking scandal
structural - neo-marxism
Althusser - rejected both economic determinism of traditional marxism and the emphasis on free will of humanistic marxists - argued that capitalist society has three structures - economic, political and ideological level - all partly independent from eachother - all have relative autonomy and two-way causality - each level can effect the other
Rejects Gramsci - rejects view we are authors of our actions - this is an illusion created by ideological state apparatuses - we are products of pre-existing structures that map our our lives for us - ISAs socialise us into finding our allotted places in the relations of production
revolution will occur if crisis in capitalism - contradictions at different levels of the three structures
positivism
Comte - 1800s - social human behaviour should be researched by adopting the same principles applies to the natural sciences - objective research to achieve objective truth - aim to find objective social facts free from interpretation and bias - natural science methods produce this
Hypothetic-inductive method - researcher is finding information about world - as knowledge grows - sees a set of patterns - confirms theory into the form of a general law - hypothetico deductive method - scientific approach - drawing up initial hypothesis and testing in order to falsify through empirical methods
interpretivism
verstehen and qualitative research
- reject logic/methods of natural sciences so reject quantitative methods of study
- argue we need to see the world from the subject’s viewpoint to understand the meanings they give their actions
- must put ourselves in the other’s shoes (verstehen) to understand their meanings
science
- subject matter is meaningful social action - can only be understood by successfully interpreting the meaning/motives of actors involved
- sociology isnt a science because deal with human meanings and not laws of cause and effect
- argue we are not puppets manipulated by social factors but autonomous beings who construct the social world through the meanings we give to it
secondary data strengths
secondary data limitations
non-random sampling strengths
non-random sampling limitations
random sampling strengths
random sampling limitations
realist methodology
science made up of open and closed systems
closed systems - researcher has control over relevant variables - can create predictions about human behaviour - popper would agree eg using lab experiments
open systems - researcher cannot control and measure all variables - hard to model - they are studied to make accurate predictions of behaviour as too many variables involved eg social class
realism and science - like with science, may not be able to directly observe/measure sociological concepts - eg false consciousness and anomie - does not mean they are not there - science can be used to study unobservable phenomena - if correct means no barriers to study meanings scientifically SO use natural/social science to explain cause of event by looking at structures and processes that are not observable but the effect of them is eg educational achievement
realistic metholody evaluation
positivists - science only concerned with observable phenomena
interpretivism - sociology cannot be researched scientifically as the peoples people give to actions are not directly observable