Structure and role of Parliament Flashcards
Bicameralism
Political system which there are two chambers
amount of members in commons
650
what did cons promise to do to no. of MPs by 2020
cut the number of MPs to 600
parliamentary privelage
legal immunity in parliament especially in terms of free speech
exclusive cognisance
right for the house to regulate its own internal affairs
example to show MPs are not above the law
expenses scandal
whips
party official responsible for ensuring MPs turn up to vote
also an instruction on how to vote
MPs salary
almost £75,000 in 2016
who is in charge of MPs salaries
independent parliamentary salaries authority
what do whips do
ensure they attend votes
instruct on how to vote
enforce discipline within the party
3 line whip
strict instructions on how to vote
don’t follow they face disciplinary action
the speaker
selects MPs to speak
maintains order
suspend MPs who break rules
does the speaker stand down
yes, post general election
usually re-elected
who does the speaker support
no one
they are non partisan
give up party affiliation
they don’t vote unless a tie
example of a controversial speaker
Michael martin
badly handled expenses scandal
resigned 2009
John Bercows support
had limited supported amongst cons
why has Bercow been described as a reforming speaker
he sough to enhance scrutiny of executive
granted more ‘urgent questions’
amount of urgent questions in 2015-16
77
hereditary peer
selected from whose inherited their title
life peer
member who has been appointed for their lifetime
peer
member of the lords
who is the lord speaker
Lord fowler
con cabinet minister elected in 2016
how many hereditary peers did the lords have before 1999 act
over 750
Peerages Act 1963
hereditary peers could renounce their title
allowed women hereditary peers to sit
who took advantage of the peerages act
alec douglas home
won by election+became con PM 1963
Life peerages act 1958
PM had the right to appoint members to upper house for life
life peerages largest group in upper house
conservative hereditary peers 1999 to 2017 comparison
299 to 49
labour hereditary peers 1999 to 2017 comparison
19 to 4
what was the impact of introducing life peers to the lords
more diversity
more professionalism-figures from business,education
the impact of removal of hereditary peers to the conservative party
cons had majority in upper house, most took con whip
now no party has majority
how did the removal of hereditary peers impact women
increased proportion of women in the lords
2017 they made up 26% (9% before 99’)
what is the problem with the size of the HoL
worlds 2nd largest legislative chamber in the world
risks damaging ability to function thus reputation
free vote 2003
MPs 7 options on lords reform
non got majority
peers voted for wholly appointed house
white paper 2007
proposed 50% appointed 50% elected
failed to get through lords
exclusive power that the commons has
right to insist on legislation
financial privelage
power to dismiss executive
right to insist on legislation
lords should ultimately give way to commons
financial privelage
lords cannot amend/delay money bills
power to dismiss executive
if vote of no confidence successful
must resign
what gives commons its primacy
conventions (Salisbury doctrine,reasonable time and secondary legislation)
parliament acts 1911/49
reasonable time
lords consider gov business in reasonable time
secondary legislation
lords usually don’t object to secondary legislation
what kind of chamber could the lords be described as
revising as opposed to a veto one
what can the lords do to commons legislation
propose amendments (don’t have to be accepted)
how long can the lords block a bill for
a year (used to be indefinitely)
what happens if the lords block a bill for a year
can still be passed in following session without consent of lords
examples of legislation which have been blocked for a year and then passed in the next session
war crimes act 1991 sexual offences (amendment) act 2000
what are money bills
concerned soley with national taxation,loans or public money
what does the 1911 parliament act say about money bills
declared as money bills by the speaker, if they don’t pass through lords unamended within 1 month it can get royal assent without lords permission
when can the commons claim financial privelage
lords pass an amendment to legislation that has financial implication (creating new spending)
when did the con-lib dem gov claim financial privelage
final stages welfare reform bill 2012
lords backed down
confidence and supply
requirement, gov must be able to command majority on vote of confidence and supply
what does supply refer to
authorization of gov spending by the commons
how can a government be defeated by the commons
motion of no confidence
how many votes of no confidence have there been
23 since 1945
who lost a vote of no confidence by one vote
james Callaghan labour 1979
what is the reasoning for the salisbury doctrine
GE victory gives governments authority to implement programme presented to electorate
how many times were the blair and brown governments defeated in the lords compared to commons
400+ in lords
7 in commons
how many defeats did the coalition face in the lords
99
how many defeats were accepted in blair and browns governments
4/10
example of defeats coalition government accepted
key provisions for public body bills 2010-12
incl plans for a priv forestry commission
what are the results of an increase in checks and reform from the lords on parliament
party balance (no majority in lords)
increase legitimacy in lords
support from MPs
gov mandate
government mandate (as a result of lords reform)
peers question coalition mandates/party has less than third of electorates support
support from MPs (result of lords reform)
force govs to amend proposals when MPs support the amendments
input legitimacy
composition of institution and its responsiveness to citizens concerns
output legitimacy
quality and effectiveness of institutions performs
why does the commons have input legitimacy
bc its directly elected+accountable
why does the lords have output legitimacy
bc of what it delivers e/g scrutiny of commons and its revision to improve legislation
what is the argument for an appointed lords rather than an elected one
has different role to commons
revising chamber/members has expertise
don’t have to worry about elections
what would be the problem with an elected upper house
competing legitimacy claims
legislative gridlock
problems with party control
functions of parliament
legislate debate scrutiny and accountability recruitment of minister representation
bill
proposal of new law