Structural Theories Flashcards
Examples of structural theories
Functionalism, Marxism, Feminism, New Right
Structural Theories
See society as a real thing existing over + above us, shaping our ideas/behaviour. People are like puppets - can be manipulated by society. They believe study of society should be about its structure; social institutions that make up society + relationships between these social institutions. Positivists: believe society can be studied like natural sciences. Macro approach: wants to focus on large numbers. Top-down approach: concerned w/ the big picture.
Consensus structuralism
Idea that society works because of agreement. (Organic Analogy) Functionalists see society like an organism: sociologists should study functions of ‘organs’ of society (social institutions) to understand society.
Conflict structuralism
Society is underpinned by conflict. Marxist believe economy drives society + determines social institutions. Institutions will function for needs of those in charge of economy + will exploit workers. This exploitation leads to conflict. Feminists argue there are gender inequalities in all areas of society.
Functionalist Theory
Macro, structural theory - focus is needs of social system + how its shapes society. A consensus theory - sees society as based on agreement of its main values + goals. A modernist theory - shares goals of enlightenment project.
Functionalism: society as a system (PARSONS)
Organic analogy - describes society as biological organism. PARSONS identifies 3 similarities between society + organism: 1) both self-regulating systems of inter-related parts that fit together. Society = parts are institutions/individual roles; body = organs + cells. 2) both have needs to survive. Organisms = food; society = mems must be socialised for society to continue. 3) both functions to ensure survival - circulatory system of body carries nutrients/oxygen to tissues. Economy helps maintain social system by meeting need for food/shelter.
Functionalism: value consensus + social order (PARSONS)
Social order achieved through existence of shared culture. Provides framework that allows individuals to cooperate through shared rules/goals. Social order only achieved through (what DURKHEIM + PARSONS calls) value consensus. It does this by integrating individuals into social system - directs them to meeting system’s needs. PARSONS: society has 2 mechanisms to ensure individuals conform to share norms/needs. 1) socialisation = teaching pple what system requires of them. They internalise systems norms + values so society, becomes part of personality structure. Agencies of socialisation - fam, education, media, religion. 2) Social control = positive sanctions to those who conform; negative sanctions to those who deviate. Eg, educational achievement rewarded w/ qualifications, those w/o are stigmatised.
Functionalism: The Gail Model
PARSONs identifies basic needs of society are met by separate subsystem of institutions:
Goal attainment - society needs to set goals and allocate resources to achieve them (function of political subsystem), Adaptation - society meets material needs (economic subsystem), Integration - parts of system integrated to pursue shared goals (role of education, religion and the media), Latency - processes that maintain society (role of the family). Role of Latency in family : pattern maintenance - socialising people to perform roles society requires. Tension management - place to allow people to ‘let off steam’ from stress of work. Goal attainment + adaptation - instrumental needs (to be met to ensure survival). Integration + latency are expressive needs (eg. Need for belonging).
Mertons internal critique of functionalism
Indispensability: Parsons ignores the fact that there may be functional alternatives e.g. lone parents may be just as good if not better at performing primary socialisation than Nuclear fam.
Functional Unity: assumes all parts of society are tightly integrated. ignores the fact that some institutions have functional autonomy (independence from each other).
Universal Functionalism: ignores the idea that some things may be functional for some but dysfunctional for others. Parsons doesn’t account for conflict within society.
Functionalism - logical criticisms
Critics argue functionalism is teleological. Idea that things exists because of their function. critics argue real explanation of something comes form cause rather than effect. Functionalism explains that family exists because children need to be socialised (effect) but doesn’t explain what caused Fam.
criticised for being unscientific. it isn’t falsifiable - doesn’t have ability to be proved wrong.
Functionalism _ conflict perspective criticisms
Criticised for inability to explain conflict + change. Marxists + Feminists argue that society isn’t harmonious, based on conflicting interests + unequal power. Stability is result of dominant groups preventing change. Conflict theorist therefore see functionalism as conservative ideology that legitimises status quo.
Functionalism _ Action perspective criticisms
Wrong (1961) criticises its deterministic view that people have no free will + are puppets to the social system. Action approaches conversely argue individuals create society by their interactions.
also argue that society is not a distinct thing with its own needs. don’t view society as having its own independent existence.
Functionalism _ postmodernist criticisms
Argues meta-narrative of functionalism cannot account for diversity + instability of PM society.
Marxist feminism Ansley 1972)
Women suffer their husbands’ work frustrations. They are takers of shit. Women are often paid less - assumed they will be partially dependant on their husbands’ earnings. They can be classified as a reserve army of labour: moved into the labour force during economic booms + out again at times of recession.
Evaluation of Marxist feminism
Shows a greater understanding of the importance of structural factors than liberal feminism. But fails to explain women’s subordination in non-capitalist societies. Also, underplays influence of non-economic factors: culture/ religion, in oppression of women. It does not emphasise differences in economic position of women - some argue that MC women + WC women are not equally exploited which Marxist feminism does not account for. It ignores social, legal changes aimed at liberation of women in western societies.