Strict Liability, Products Liability, Damages and Defenses Flashcards
what are the three general categories of strict liability?
- Abnormally dangerous activities
- Wild animals
- Defective products
What are factors courts consider when determining if an activity is abnormally dangerous?
- Foreseeable and significant risk of harm
- Appropriateness of the location for activity
- Value to community
NO MATTER HOW CAREFUL
A defendant engaging in abnormally dangerous activities is liable for the harm that ______ from the risk that made the activity abnormally dangerous
Flows
True or false: owners are strictly liable for the harm arising from the animal’s dangerous propensities
True
What sort of liability do landowners have in regards to wild animals and people on their property?
Licensees/invitees - strictly liable
Trespassers - not strictly liable
Note: some jurisdictions put liability on owners with vicious watchdogs
When is an owner of a domestic animal strictly liable?
If the owner knows or should have reason to know that the animal has dangerous propensities
When is the owner of a trespassing pet strictly liable?
Reasonably foreseeable damage caused by the trespassing pet
True or false: a plaintiff’s contributory negligence bars recovery
False, but in some jurisdictions comparative negligence does bar recovery
True or false: Assumption of the risk is a complete bar to recovery
True.
What are the different types of claims a plaintiff can bring for products liability?
- Negligence
- Strict liability for defective products
- Breach of warranty claim
How can a product be defective?
- Manufacturing: deviation from intended design
- Design: consumer expectation or risk utility test
- Failure to warn:
To prove a strict liability products defect claim, a plaintiff must do what?
- Show that the product was defective
- Prove that the defect existed when the product left the defendant’s control
- Provide evidence of his injury when product was used in a foreseeable way
Multiple Ds can be involved with the chain of liability
Explain the risk utility test versus the consumer expectation test
Consumer expectation: less safe than than ordinary customer would expect
Risk utility: risk outweighs benefits, alternative design
The more technical product = more likely for risk utility
True or false: Courts may allow a proof of a defect by circumstantial evidence
True, especially when the defect causes the product to be destroyed
True or false: plaintiffs in a products liability claim must be in privity with the defendants
False. Can sue up and down the chain of production or distribution. Defendants may indemnify each other.
Same goes for bystanders.