Intentional Torts: Assault, Battery, IIED, False Imprisonment, Defenses Flashcards
An intentional tort has three elements:
- Act
- Intent: purpose, substantially certain
- Causation
True or false: Children and mentally incompetent persons cannot be held liable for intentional torts if they act with the requisite intent
False. They can be held liable if they act with the requisite intent
Explain the doctrine of transferred intent
When the intent to commit one tort satisfies the required intent for a different tort
Different tort – same person
Same tort – different person
Different tort – different person
Define battery
- D causes a harmful/offensive contact with the person of another
- Acts with intent to cause the contact or apprehension of the contact
Must result in actual contact
True or false: a battery victim must be conscious of touching to be offensive contact
False.
Ex: An operating room attendant inappropriate touches a patient under anesthesia
Can a hyper sensitive victim claim offensive contact (battery)?
Yes, if the defendant knows that the victim is hypersensitive. Even though the standard for offensive is a person of ordinary sensitbilities
Must contact be direct to be offensive for a claim of battery?
No. Must be with the person of another - anything connected to the plaintiff’s person.
Intent required for battery is ______ not ______?
Contact, not the offense
True or false: the doctrine of transferred intent applies to battery
True
What damages can a plaintiff recover for battery and assault?
- nominal (no harm)
- regular damages (harm flowing from battery - eggshell)
- punitive (D acted outrageous, with malice)
Can battery occur if the parties had implied or express consent?
NO
Define assault
Defendant engages in an act that:
1. causes reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or or offensive bodily contact; and
2. intends to cause apprehension of such contact or cause to such contact
Is bodily harm required for assault?
No, but the plaintiff must be aware of the defendant’s actions.
Are threats of future harm or hypothetical harm sufficient for assault?
No. Must be without significant delay.
Can words ever suffice for assault?
Generally no, BUT if D is able to carry out the threat imminently and takes action to put the victim in a state of apprehension, then there may be assault.