Strict/Absolute Liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Is a mental element required for strict/absolute liability offences?

A

No. Unlike negligence, the conduct of the actor is not measured against an objective standard – a particular act is declared illegal and liability is incurred for committing that act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What do proponents of strict liability offences say this type of offence is suitable for?

A

Regulatory offences, offences committed by corporate entities, and for public protection in certain circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the difference between strict and absolute liability offences?

A

Strict liability – no mens rea required but a defence of due diligence is available
Absolute liability - no mens rea required and a defence of due diligence is not available

Note this differentiation is somewhat modern in Irish courts (came about largely after CC case)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How to determine if offences are strict liability crimes.

A

Often the statutory provision will be silent on the issue of mens rea.
- Presumption of mens rea may be rebutted explicitly or by implication with reference to the subject matter of the offence.
- Courts will often consider the development of an offence over time to determine if mens rea is excluded by implication. (like in Sweet v. Parsley)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the Reilly v Patwell considerations for strict v absolute liability?

A

Written by McCarthy J

(1) The moral gravity of the offence.
(2) The social stigma attached to the offence.
(3) The penalty.
(4) The ease (or difficulty) with which a duty is discharged or the law obeyed.
(5) Whether or not absolute liability would encourage obedience.
(6) The ease or difficulty with which the law might be enforced.
(7) The social consequences of non-compliance.
(8) The desideratum to be achieved when considering the statutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Overcrowding in buses - passenger caps. High Court rejected bus operator’s due diligence defence, saying this strict liability offence had been implemented to protect the public interest.

A

M’Adam v Dublin United Tramways Co [1929]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Canadian case re: city who hired a company to dispose of waste, who then didn’t do so properly. Notable because Dickson J proposes a “half-way house” solution of parties being able to claim a due diligence defence.

A

R v City of Sault Ste Marie (1978)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Farmer with piggery next to a river. Give key case summary.

A

Maguire v Shannon Regional Fisheries Board [1994] - KEY CASE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cavan County Council was held to be violating some water pollution laws. Give KEY CASE SUMMARY

A

Shannon Regional Fisheries Board v Cavan County Council [1996] - KEY CASE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Voyager bar owner charged with littering offence. Give KEY CASE SUMMARY.

A

Reilly v Judge Patwell [2008] - KEY CASE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ranchers charged with violation of EU law by letting herd graze of protected land. Give KEY CASE SUMMARY.

A

Minister for the Environment v Leneghan [2009] - KEY CASE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Guy sleeping with underage girl. Give KEY CASE SUMMARY.

A

CC v Ireland [2006] - KEY CASE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Taxi driver allowing another person to utilize their taxi without the appropriate driving license. Give KEY CASE SUMMARY.

A

National Transport Authority v Beakhurst [2020] - KEY CASE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly