Stress & Coping 2 Flashcards
Coping Definition - Lazarus and Folkman, 1984
- Coping is defined as “constantly changing cognitive and behavioural efforts to manage specific external and/or internal demands that are appraised as taxing or exceeding the resources of the person”
- Actual coping efforts, aimed at problem management and emotional regulation, give rise to outcomes of the coping process (for example, psychological well-being, functional status (e.g. health status, disease progression, and so forth), and health behaviours (e.g. adherence)
Coping Dimensions
Active coping efforts are conceptualised along two dimensions:
1. Problem–focused coping (problem management strategies)
2. Emotional–focused coping (emotion regulation strategies)
There is also an avoidant coping category
Problem-Focused Coping: Part 1
“Problem-focused coping refers to efforts to improve the troubled person-environment relationship by changing things, for example, by seeking information about what to do, by holding back from impulsive and premature actions, and by confronting the person or persons responsible for one’s difficulty.” (Monat & Lazarus, 1991, p. 6)
•e.g., Cancer = consult experts, determine best course of action
Problem-Focused Coping: Part 2
- Tends to increase attention to the stressful situation
- Suggested to be more adaptive when something can be done about the situation
- Types of problem-focused coping:
- Problem-Solving: analysing situation and taking direct action
- Confrontational Coping: taking assertive action
- Seeking Social Support: seeking information
Emotion-Focused Coping: Part 1
•“Emotion-focused (or palliative) coping refers to thoughts or actions whose goal is to relieve the emotional impact of stress. These are apt to be mainly palliative in the sense that such strategies of coping do
not actually alter the threatening or damaging conditions but make the person feel better.” (Monat & Lazarus, 1991, p. 6)
•e.g., Cancer = focus on reducing emotional responses
Emotion-Focused Coping: Part 2
•Can increase attention to the stressful situation, but can also be a
distraction
•Suggested to be more adaptive when nothing can be done about the
situation
•Types of emotion-focused coping
• Seeking Social Support: emotional support
• Distancing: making cognitive efforts to detach from the situation or create a positive outlook
• Self-Control: attempts to modulate feelings or actions regarding the problem
• Accepting Responsibility: acknowledging role in the problem
• Positive Reappraisal: creating a positive meaning in terms of personal growth
Avoidant Coping
- Refers to a set of strategies used (deliberately or not) to distract from the stressful situation or delay dealing with the stressor
- Types of avoidant coping:
- Venting
- Blaming
- Self-distraction
- Distancing
- Escape Avoidance
- Defence mechanisms (denial, intellectualisation)
Other Ways to Conceptualise Coping
- Brown and Nicassio(1987) -active versus passive coping
- Jensen, Turner, Romano, and Strom (1995) cognitive versus behavioural types
- Compas and colleagues (2001,2006)
- primary-control engagement(e.g., problem solving, changing the situation, and emotion regulation),
- secondary-control engagement(e.g., positive thinking, acceptance, and distraction)
- disengagement coping
- Aim for a balance between approach and avoidance
Coping Styles
•What we have talked about so far is situation-specific coping efforts
•Coping styles are conceptualized as stable dispositional
characteristics that reflect generalized tendencies to interpret and respond to stress in particular ways (Lazarus, 1993)
• Coping efforts = mediator
• Coping Styles = moderator
•Coping styles are believed to drive appraisal and coping efforts (Lazarus, 1993).
Coping Style –Information Seeking: Part 1
- Healthcare setting has a lot of uncertainty, information seeking common
- Evidence that seeking information is helpful (↓ distress ↑ adaptive health behaviours)
- BUT we differ on how much information we find helpful
- Monitor versus Blunter
Coping Style –Information Seeking: Part 2
- Monitor versus Blunter
- Monitoring better than blunting when stressor is short-term and need for information can be satisfied
- Monitors may be more inclined to seek health-related information that could have significant medical benefits
- Monitors play a more active role in medical decision making
- Monitors maybe less likely to experience regret following difficult medical decisions
- BUT
- Monitoring may be associated with more threatening primary appraisals of health threats. Monitors exhibit more physical distress and arousal during invasive medical procedures than blunters (Miller and Mangan, 1983)
Coping Style -Optimism: Part 1
•The tendency to have positive rather than negative generalized expectancies for outcomes.
•Dispositional optimism appears to exert effects on each of the key processes of the Transactional Model.
• Among gay men at risk for AIDS, dispositional optimism was associated with perceived lower risk of AIDS (primary appraisal), higher perceived control over AIDS (secondary appraisal), more active coping strategies, less distress,
and more risk-reducing health behaviors(Taylor et al., 1992).
Coping Style -Optimism: Part 2
•Studies show link between optimism and psychological adjustment across a variety of illness (Kung et al., 2006; Carver et al., 1993)
•Studies show link between optimism and disease outcomes
(mortality) across a variety of illness (Kim et al., 2017)
Coping Style –Control
- Locus of control = the extent to which people feel that they have control over the events that influence their lives.
- Internal versus external
- Passive (not in control) vs Active (in control)
Social Support: Part 1
- Social support plays a key role in coping
- By influencing key processes posited in the Transactional Model, social support can influence how people adapt to stressful events.
- For example, availability of confidants could affect a person’s perceptions of personal risk or the severity of illness (primary appraisal).
- These interactions could also bolster beliefs about one’s ability to cope with situations and manage difficult emotions (secondary appraisal)