Stress Flashcards

1
Q

Participants in Johanssons study (work as a cause of stress)

A

24 workers at a Swedish sawmill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the ‘high-risk’ group in Johanssons study

A
  • 14 workers

- machine paced, isolated, very repetitive, highly skilled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe the control group in Johanssons study (work as a cause of stress)

A
  • 10 cleaners

- work more varied, self paced, more socialising with other workers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How was data collected in Johanssons study? (Work as a cause of stress)

A
  • urine samples to measure stress related hormones (adrenaline)
  • records of stress related illnesses
  • self report about mood, alertness
  • caffeine and nicotine consumption recorded
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the 3 results for Johanssons study (work as a cause of stress)

A
  • high risk group secreted more stress hormones on work days than rest days
  • high risk group secreted more stress hormones that control group
  • high risk group shower higher levels of stress related illness such as headaches
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the work stressors that lead to physiological arousal in Johanssons study?

A

Repetitiveness, machine-pacing of work, high levels of responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the aim of Kanners study?

A

To compare the Hassles and Uplifts scale, and the Berkman Life Events scale as predictors of psychological symptoms of stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the sample in Kanners study?

A
  • 100 people who had previously completed a health survey in 1965
  • from California
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How was psychological symptoms of stress assessed in Kanners study?

A
  • Hopkins symptom checklist

- Bradburn morale scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How long did participants complete the Hassles Rating scale for in Kanners study?

A

9 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When did participants complete the Berkman Life Events scale in Kanners study?

A

After 10 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In Kanners study, how often did participants complete the Hopkins Symptom Checklist and the Bradburn Morale Scale and what were they assessing?

A

Every month for 9 months

Psychological symptoms of stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In Kanners study, what were the results for men?

A

Life events correlated positively with hassles and negatively for uplifts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In Kanners study, what were the results for women?

A

The more life events they reported the more hassles and uplifts they reported

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In Kanners study, what did hassles positively correlate with?

A

Psychological symptoms on HSCL

Correlated more positively than life events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was a conclusion from Kanners study?

A

Hassles are a more powerful predictor of psychological symptoms than life events

17
Q

What was the aim of Geer and Maisels study? (Lack of control as a cause of stress)

A

To see if perceived control or actual control can reduce stress reactions to averse stimuli

18
Q

Who were the participants in Geer and Maisels study?

A

60 undergraduates from New York university

19
Q

Describe group 1 in Geer and Maisels study

A
  • given control over how long images were shown
  • could press button to terminate image
  • told a tone would precede each new image
20
Q

Describe group 2 in Geer and Maisels study

A
  • were warned photos would be 60 seconds apart
  • were told they would see photo for 35 seconds
  • were told 10 second warning tone would precede each photo
  • had no control but were aware of what was happening
21
Q

Describe group 3 in Geer and Maisels study

A
  • given no control

- did not know when photo would be shown/for how long for

22
Q

How was stress levels measured in Geer and Maisels study?

A
  • Galvanic Skin Response machine

- ECG to measure heart rate

23
Q

Which group showed most/least stress in Geer and Maisels study?

A
  • group 2 showed most

- group 1 showed least

24
Q

What was a conclusion for Geer and Maisels study?

A

Having control over your environment can reduce stress responses

25
Aim of Johanssons study (work as a cause of stress)
To investigate whether work stressors such as repetitiveness, machine-regulated pace of work and high levels responsibility increase stress-related physiological arousal and stress related illness
26
How is the Galvanic Skin Response used to measure physiological symptoms of stress?
- finger grips containing moisture sensors on fingertips - changes in moisture level are measured (positive and negative) - baseline measurement was taken to see changes
27
What physiological symptoms occur when someone is stressed?
Rise in blood pressure Rise in heart rate Sweating Hormones
28
Aim of Michenbaum
To compare SIT with standard behavioural systematic desensitisation and a control group on waiting list
29
Participants in Michenbaum
21 students aged 17-25
30
Describe the SIT group in Michenbaum
Received 8 therapy sessions | Given positive statements to say and relaxation techniques to use in test situations
31
Describe the 3 stages of SIT
1. Conceptualisation - identifying sources of the problem 2. Skill acquisition and rehearsal - learns new coping skills and practices 3. Application and follow through
32
Describe systematic desensitisation group in Michenbaums study
Given 8 therapy sessions with progressive relaxation training
33
Describe control group in Michenbaums study
Were told they were on a waiting list and would receive therapy in the future
34
What did Michenbaums participants complete before being allocated to a group?
Test anxiety questionnaire
35
In Michenbaums study, which group performed better on the test anxiety questionnaire after the study?
SIT group
36
What was the conclusions for Michenbaums study?
SIT is a effective way of reducing anxiety in students and is more effective than behavioural techniques such a systematic desensitisation
37
What was the aim in Budzynski?
To see whether biofeedback is an effective method of reducing tension headaches
38
Participants in Budzynski
18 participants who replied to any advertisement in a local paper in Colorado