Stimulus control Flashcards
Guttman & Kalish (1956)
Trained pigeons to peck S+ 580nm on a VI 60s schedule. Then ran a gen test. Found largest response at training stimuli and a decremental gradient either side of this. Decremental generalisation gradient.
Jenkins & Harrison (1960)
Group 1) SST - non differential
1000Hz tone –> VI schedule of reinforcement
ran gen test - found very little stimulus control, a large amount of generalisation and not much discrimination
Group 2) Presence-absence training/ interdimentional
1000Hz tone –> VI schedule of reinforcement
No tone –> EXT
Found the stimulus in generalisation were under greater control, and there was more discrimination.
=Stimulus was more relevant - its presence came to be related to reinforcement, and its absence - no reinforcement.
Peterson (1962)
Rearing ducklings with monochromatic vs normal light.
Ran generalisation tests after teaching them to peck a yellow key. Monochromatic light –> complete generalisation, normal –> normal discrimination and gen gradient.
But these results were not replicated
Jenkins & Harrison (1960)
Prepared: colour generalisation and food
Unprepared: sound generalisation and food
-Even with trained tone = was some discrimination, showing some level of stimulus control.
Hearst & Koresko (1968)
-4 groups of pigeons on single-stimulus training S+
-Line training
-S+ –> food on VI schedule
-Tested generalisation on line orientation dimension
-Varied amount of training given
2 days –> not much response or stimulus control was present although the largest response was at training stimulus
14 days –> more behaviour response and more control - higher maximum and steeper gradients
Hanson (1959)
Control: SST with 550nm S+ (no S-) Experimental: Intradimenstional training with 55nm S+ and 560nm S- Ran gen tests with colour --> Control: peak at training stimulus Experimental: peak shift away from S-
Spences theory
Absolute theory of stimulus control
- Excitatory and inhibitory gradients around the stimuli – summation to form post-discrimination generalisation gradient.
- Parsimonious theory
- Accounts for transposition and peak shift
Kohler - transposition (chickens)
Originally trained to chose between S+ (light grey) and S- (dark grey). Following trials, chickens chose the lighter grey card (S++) and hence seemed to have learnt the rule ‘choose the lighter card’ during the training stimuli and transposed this during the testing conditions.
Honig et al (1963)
Presence absence training.
Line S- group: S- with line, S+ with no line
Line S+ group: S+ with line, S- with no line.
Ran generalisation test. Found excitatory and inhibitory gradients. Excitatory gradient was steeper –> expected