Stereotypes Flashcards

1
Q

Stereotypes

A

Collection of traits that society associates with a particular social group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Prejudice

A

A negative attitude held towards a social group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Discrimination

A

Negative behaviours towards a person because of their group members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Social categorisation

A

Assigning people to groups based on social categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do we socially categorise

A

Fuzzy boundaries and revolving around a central prototype

Prototypes are cognitive representations of the most typical features of a category

Category members vary in terms of typicality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why do we socially categorise

A

Understand- informative for a person perception- allow judgments about disposition

Survival- evolutionarily adaptive, identify members of allied groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outgroup Homogeneity Effect

JONES, WOOD & QUATTRONE (1981)

A

View members of an outgroup as more similar to each other than members of the jngorjoc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

KASSIN, FEIN & MARKUS (2017)

A

Ingroup- individual feels a sense of membership, belonging and identity

Outgroup- does not feel a sense of membership, belonging and identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

QUATTRONE & JONES (1980)

A

Video of person from their own or other university makes a decision

Likelihood of average member of that university making the same decision

More likely to predict average uni student would respond in same way in outgroup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Social explanations

Kernel of truth

A

Stereotypes based on actual differences between different social groups

Tendency to exaggerate these differences, extend them to all members of group leads to development of stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Social explanations
The stereotype content model
FISKE ET AL (2002)

A

Princeton trilogy studies- tracked stereotype change for 70 years

Most ethnicity and nationality based stereotypes have changed

Stereotype content reflects changes in society
Classified along 2 dimensions: competence and warmth

Low warmth, low competence= low status, competitive
High warmth, low competence= low status, not competitive
Low warmth, high competence= high status, competitive
High warmth, high competence= high status, not competitive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cognitive explanations
illusory correlation
HAMILTON & GILFORD (1976)

A

2 statistically infrequent events are paired, correlation overestimated due to their distinctiveness= false illusory correlation

Minority groups perform negative behaviour- better encoding- minority group associated= formation of negative stereotype

Group B negative behaviours should be most distinctive- overestimate number of negative behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stereotype activation

KUNDA & SPENCER (2003)

A

Degree to which a stereotype is accessible in the mind

Measuring= lexical decision task
-decide whether stimuli presenter in black text are real words or not non-words as quickly as possible, ignoring stimuli in red

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Stereotype application

KUNDA & SPENCER (2003)

A

Actual use of activated stereotypes in judgements
e.g., forming an impression

Measuring= measures that assess whether someone uses stereotypes in judgment
e.g., ask ppt to form impression of outgroup member, rate degree they possess certain stereotypic traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why do people stereotype

A

‘Energy saving device’- simplified processing, reduces cognitive load

Judgement heuristics- mental shortcut for streamlining social perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

MACRAE ET AL (1994)

A

Dual task paradigm- cognitive resources divided between 2 simultaneous tasks

Ppts given names and personality traits- formed impressions whilst listening to audio task

  • given category labels, use stereotypes
  • not given category labels, couldn’t use stereotypes

=if using stereotypes saves cognitive resources, ppt remember more of the audio

17
Q

Biases in exposure to information

JOHNSTON & MACRAE (1994)

A

Impression formation task- presented with list of qs from interview with physics students

  • read all questions and answers
  • select as many as needed to form impression

Controlled condition view more stereotype confirming questions- rates physics students higher on stereotypic traits

18
Q

Biases in interpretation to information

A

Negative/stereotypic behaviours attributed to disposition

Positive/ counterstereotypic attributes to situation

HEWSTONE (1990)- negative behaviours attributed to disposition, positive behaviour explained away in outgroup

19
Q

Self-fulfilling prophecy

A

Expectancies lead us to behave in a way that encourages stereotype consistent behaviour

CHEN & BARGH (1997)
Perceiver condition- subliminally primed with faces of African Americans or Caucasians on dot counting task
=paired perceiver and targets played game of catch phrase, rated verbal behaviour on degree of hostility

20
Q

Is social categorisation automatic?

A

For-

  • cognitive misers- simplify to reasonably deal with info
  • categories are basis for normal prejudgment
  • categorise salient social categories so much

Against-

  • shouldn’t do it when it’s not needed or irrelevant
  • categorisation should be ‘goal-dependent’
21
Q

Stereotype threat

STEELE & ARONSON (1995)

A

Concern experienced when possibility may act consistent with negative stereotypes

Black ppts performed worse on intellectual ability- but performed equally as well when no reference was made to intellectual ability

22
Q

FRANZ ET AL (2004)

A

IAT to measure racial attitudes
Assigned to threat, no threat or no instruction

=explicit threat higher score indicating white implicit bias

23
Q

disengagement

DAVIES ET AL (2002)

A

Women exposed to gender-stereotypic TV ads reported less interest in pursuing qualifications/careers in fields involving quantitative skills

24
Q

Reducing stereotype threat

MIYAKE ET AL (2010)

A

Ppts on introductory physics course completed intervention twice during semester

Values affirming: choose most important value and why it is important to you

Control group: choose least important value and why it is important to others

=women performed significantly better when opportunity to self-affirm personal values

25
Q

Reducing threat

A

Reframing and repraisal- tests reframed as challenging learning experiences- anxiety seen as helpful

De-emphasise- threatened social identity/ domain