Impression Formation Flashcards
Nature of Impression Formation
Way in which we form impressions and attribute specific characters to them
Configural Model
ASCH (1946)
Overall consistent impression
Central traits determine how attributes combine, determine how peripheral traits interplay
Read a list of attributes, ppt give impression
- warm- certain things to be right, sincere in an argument, like to see point won
- cold- snobbish, believes set apart from others, calculating
Warm/cold traits influential on overall impression compared to peripheral polite/blunt
Primacy effect- first terms set direction, subsequent terms are related to the first
Cognitive Algebra
ANDERSON (1965,1978)
Forming impressions of others underpins judgements about safety and danger- whether to avoid or approach someone
Adaptive behaviour… evaluative process- assign subjective value to each trait observed
How are evaluations combined?
Summative- total score to see if good (+) or bad (-)
Averaging- few strong traits can influence impressions more than a lot of mild traits
Weighted averaging- certain traits given greater weighting in certain contexts
Negativity bias
Negative traits have greater impact on impressions
Negative information is remembered more
Negative traits are more predictive of voting behaviour
Halo effect
EAGLY ET AL (1991)
Attribute positive qualities to attractive people
OLSON & MARSHUETZ (2005)
21 students exposed to attractive/unattractive faces- judged whether positive or negative
Reaction time faster to recognise attractive faces
Implicit positive attitudes towards attractive faces
Baby-faced faces
Larger eyes, higher eyebrows, rounder faces, smaller chin, thicker lips
KEATING, RANDALL & KENDRIC (1999)
51 ppts
Baby faced Kennedy perceived as less powerful
Cultural Differences
ZEBROWITZ ET AL (2012)
30 US men and 40 indigenous Bolivian men rated photos
Culture specific methods
Strong agreement on attractiveness and baby-faces for own
Errors in impression
RULE (2013)
Multiple choice quiz
50% complied and stopped working after 5 mins, 50% cheated
Other ppts rated target faces on trustworthiness
Ratings of trustworthiness were unrelated to whether target cheated
Political votes
BALLEW & TODOROV (2007)
Select competent winners / runners up after 100ms, 250ms and no time constraint
Select actual winner as being more competent and all exposure durations
CEO hiring
GRAHAM (2014)
Matched CEOs and non-CEOs
Which person is more: competent, trustworthy, likeable, attractive
More likely to select CEO as more competent and attractive- positively correlated with CEOs pay
Jury verdicts
PORTER TEN BRINKS & GUTAW (2010)
Photo of accused, written descriptive of the crime- severe or mild
Severe crimes= guilty verdicts formed less on evidence if accuser had untrustworthy looking face
Interpersonal and context factors
Clothing The perceiver The context Culture, race and ethnicity Knowledge