Statutory interpretation Flashcards

1
Q

Definition statutory interpretation.

A

If there is a dispute over the meaning of a word or phrase in an Act of parliament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reasons for statutory interpretation

A

-words may have several meanings.
-meaning of words can change overtime
-may have been drafted up too quickly (e.g. The Dangerous Dog Act 1990)
-Changes in technology can affect how law is applied (Royal College of Nursing v DHSS)
-Drafting of original bill may contain errors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Approaches to statutory interpretation.

A
  • The literal rule
  • The golden rule
  • The mischief rule
  • The purposive approach.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Definition of literal rule

A

Given words their plain, ordinary or literal meaning even if results are not sensible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Lord Esher quote

A

If the words of an Act are clear ten you must follow them even if they lead to a manifest absurdity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Literal rule case- Whiteley v Chappell (1868)

A

Facts:
D posed as someone who had died in order to vote an election.
Words that needed to be interpreted:
‘impersonating any person entitled to vote’
Outcome:
D- not guilty
applying literal rule, a dead person cannot vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Literal rule- Fisher v Bell (1961)

A

Facts: A shop-keeper put flick knives on display charged for ‘offering for sale knives under restriction of offensive weapons Act 1959’
Words that needed to be interpreted:
‘offer for sale’
Outcome:
D- was not guilty
not offer to sale, it was an ‘invitation to treat’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

literal rule- London and NE railway co and berriman (1946)

A

Facts:
Mrs Berriman husband killed whilst oiling points on railway line.
Compensation available if ‘replaying or repairing track’
Interpreted words:
‘Replaying or repairing’
Outcome:
Mrs Berriman not entitled as was held ‘maintaining track’ not ‘relaying or repairing’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R (Haw) v SOS for the Home Department (2006)

A

The court of appeal refused to apply a literal approach to a new piece of legislation as they felt it would not reflect the intention of parliament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Disadvantages of the literal rule

A
  • Disagreements as what amounts to ordinary or natural meaning: R v Maginnis (supply)
  • Words may have more than one meaning- act unclear
  • unfair results (Berriman)
  • absurd results (whitely)
  • Absurb decision clearly not what parliament wants undermine public confidence.
  • Law commission: the literal rule assumes an unattainable perfection on in draftsmanship.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Advantages of literal rule

A
  • respects parliamentary sovereignty and prevents unelected judges from making law
  • Lord Scarman- in favor of L.R
  • Upholds separation of powers by restricting judges roles
  • makes law more certain as law interpreted exactly how written.
  • rules easier for judges and leads to quick decisions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly