Statutory Interpretation Flashcards

1
Q

What was argued in Twinning v Myers?

A

Whether roller skates were classed as a vehicle. They were not as the statute expressed “motor vehicle”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the literal rule?

A

The intention of parliament is in the words of the legislation and must be taken at literal value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was held in Cheeseman v DPP?

A

The defendant was acquitted of masturbating in a public toilet “to the annoyance of passengers” contrary to S.81 Public Health Amendment Act 1902, as the plain clothed officers did not account as “passengers”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the golden rule?

A

It avoids an absurdity through narrow application or wider application

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is narrow application in the golden rule?

A

The judge can choose between different meanings and pick the most sensible option

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a case example of narrow application in the golden rule?

A

R v Allen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is wider application in the golden rule?

A

Words have one clear meaning, the golden rule can be used to change the words to better suit the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a case example of wider application in the golden rule?

A

Re Sigsworth in the modification of the Administration of Estates Act 1925

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the mischief rule?

A

The court can look at case law from before the statute was enacted to decide what the intention of parliament was. The mischief rule’s aim is to cover a loop-hole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What case was the mischief rule established?

A

Heydon’s case 1584

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was held in Smith v Hughes?

A

All prostitutes were found guilty as they were in the view of the street whilst soliciting and it didn’t matter whether they were physically in the street or not.
The statute used was S1(1) Street Offences Act 1959

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the purposive approach?

A

Judges decide what parliaments true intention was by using intrinsic and extrinsic aids

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was held in R v Z?

A

The appellant stated the ‘Real IRA’ were not on the list of proscribed organisations, though the court held that in the Terrorism Act 2000 Parliament intended to include all of those organisations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In what case was the ban on hansard relaxed?

A

Pepper v Hart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly