Statutory interpretation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Need for statutory interpretation

A
  • Bring definition to broad terms
  • Ambiguity of words within the statute
  • drafting errors
  • new developments in society can lead to needing to interpret law in different ways in order to apply it to circumstances
  • Changes in language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Literal rule

A

The literal rule says that the intention of Parliament is best found in the ordinary natural meaning of the words even if the result is absurd.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

literal rule case

A

London and North Eastern Railway co-the Berriman 1946 - railway worker was killed while doing maintenance work oiling points along the rail line the fatal accidents act stated a look out should be provided for men working on the railway line for the purpose of ‘relaying or repairing’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

advantages of literal rule

A
  • democratic
  • cases are predictable
  • lawyers can plan for a defence
  • respect the separation of powers an supremacy of Parliament
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

disadvantages of literal rule

A
  • absurd results leading to lack of justice when morally deserved
  • assumes the act is perfectly written
  • ## parliament is unlikely to be able to cover all issues within one act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the golden rule

A

this rule says that if the literal rule produces an absurdity the court should look for another meaning of words to avoid this result.
Narrow approach- court can choose between the different meanings of the word or phrase if there is only one meaning then that meaning must be taken.
Broad approach- where the words have only one clear meaning but that meaning would lead to an absurdity in this case the court will use the golden rule to modify the words of the statute to avoid this problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Golden rule broad approach case

A

Re Sigsworth- son murdered his mum he was been her ‘issue’ to inherit. No ambiguity but couldn’t let him be rewarded for his murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Golden rule narrow approach case

A

Adler V George- parked car obstructing the queens forces argued he was not ‘in the vicinity’ but IN the way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Advantages of golden rule

A
  • allows for sensible decisions

- respects authority of parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Disadvantages of golden rule

A
  • lack predictability and guidelines
  • only allows for changes in very limited circumstances
  • couldn’t be used in berriman as although the result was unfair it wasn’t absurd or repugnant.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the mischief rule

A

The definition comes from the Heydons case (1584) where it was said that 4 points should be considered when interpreting:

  • what was the common law before the Act
  • what was the problem with the common law
  • how did Parliament aim to amend it
  • what was the reason for the amendment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

mischief rule case

A

Smith V Hughes - women soliciting sex work from balconies however they weren’t literally breaking the law as they weren’t in a ‘street or public place’. However the mischief rule looked into what the act aimed to prevent and convicted the women

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

advantages of the mischief rule

A
  • closes loopholes
  • allows the law to develop and adapt to changing needs
  • Judges have greater flexibility
  • some judges may argue that they are respecting Parliaments wishes by giving effect to the true intention despite using a degree of discretion
  • The law of commission recommends it and believes it should be the only one used out of the three
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Unified approach

A

Proposed by Sir David Rupert cross the unified approach applies or three rules
first starting with the literal rule and if it results in an absurdity he moves on to the golden rule in the narrow approach and then moves on to the mischief rule this approach relies heavily on various aids and presumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Purposive approach

A

The purposive approach goes beyond the powers of the mischief rule because its not just looking for what the gap was in the old legislation. Judges decide what they believe Parliament meant to achieve. what the purpose was for the act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

advantages of purposive approach

A
  • leads to justice in individual cases
  • allows for new development in technology
  • avoids absurd decisions
17
Q

disadvantages of purposive approach

A
  • difficult to find parliaments intentions
  • allows judges to make law (undemocratic)- as they are deciding what they think the law should be rather than using the direct words of parliament .
  • leads to uncertainty in the law(impossible to know when judges may use this approach making it diffuse for lawyers to predict outcomes for their clients)
18
Q

case example for the purposive approach

A

R v secretary of state 2003 - ‘embryo means a live human embryo where fertilization is complete’ - held that the cloned embryos were covered by the statute. (pro life alliance)

19
Q

what is the ejusdem genris rule

A

This states that when there is a list of specific words followed by general words then the general words should be interpreted in relation to the specific words.

20
Q

ejusdem genris rule case example

A

Hobbs v CG Robertson ltd- injured eye when bricklaying. words of the act said that if a workman was ‘breaking cutting, dressing or carving stone concrete, slab or similar materials’ then they must be provided goggles. it was ruled that brick is not a similar material and so no compensation was allowed

21
Q

what is expressio unius exclusio alterius

A

where there is a list of words which is not followed by general words them act applies only to the items in the list

22
Q

expressio unius exclusio alterius case example

A

Tempest V kilner- wanted to see if the sale of stocks over £10 needed to have evidence in writing. ‘goods, wares and merchandise’ because stocks and shares weren’t mentioned they were not caught by the statute.

23
Q

What is Noscitur a sociis

A

this means that the words must be looked at in context and interpreted accordingly involves looking at other words in the same section or other sections in the act.

24
Q

Noscitur a sociis case example

A

Inland revenue commissioners v frere- The case involved interpreting a section which set out rules for ‘interest, annuities and other annual interests’. because of the words are the annual interest in the section the court decided the interest only meant annual interest

25
Q

What are intrinsic aids

A

these are matters within the statue itself which may help make its meaning clearer (long title, short title and the preamble that sets out Parliaments purpose for the act).

26
Q

adv of intrinsic aids

A

+long preamble in older statues setting out the purpose

+in some statutes there are definitions (Theft Act 1968 building defined as ‘an inhabited vehicle or vessel)

27
Q

disadvantages of intrinsic aids

A
  • modern statues do not have long preambles

- definitions are not always included (Theft Act 1968 didn’t define dishonestly)

28
Q

what are extrinsic aids

A

Sources outside the words in the act that can help the statute to be clear ( hansard, dictionaries from the time)

29
Q

adv of extrinsic aids

A

+ hansard states all the discussion had about the act and is open for everyone (Ae beckett & sons ltd v midlands electricity 2003)
+use of dictionary is quick and easy

30
Q

disadvantages of extrinsic aids

A
  • using hansard may not reveal all that parliament intended as all the words used in the statute may not have been said in the debate (R v Deegan C of A ‘folding pocketknife)
  • hansard can be very time consuming as there’s so much to get through
  • additional costs of lawyers as they feel obliged to spend time reading through all of relevant debates out of fear of being sued for negligence.