State Regulation And Commerce Flashcards
What is the dormant commerce clause generally?
The Constitution contemplates a system of regulation of commerce and taxation that includes both the federal and state governments. The Dormant Commerce Clause is a doctrine that limits the power of states to legislate in ways that impact interstate commerce.
The Commerce Clause (Art 1, Sec 8, Clause 3), reserves to Congress the power to regulate commerce’s w it’s foreign nations, and among the states, and with native tribes. As a corollary, individual states are limited in their ability to legislate on such matters.
What is the Dormant Commerce Clause Rule?
The Dormant Commerce Clause dictates that if Congress has not enacted legislation in a particular area of interstate commerce, the the states are free to regulate, so long as the state or local action does NOT:
1) Discriminate against out of state commerce
2) Unduly Burden interstate commerce, OR
3) Regulate extraterritorial (wholly-out-of-state) activity
DUBE
In Dormant Commerce clause (DCC), what is the test for determining whether a regulation discriminates against out of state commerce?
A state or local regulation discriminates against out-of-state commerce if it protects local economic interests at the expense of out-of-state competitors. cases in point: state statute prohibiting importation of OOS garbage discriminated in favor of local trash collectors, and so did a statute requiring milk sold locally to be bottled locally.
In the DCC, what is the Necessary to important state interest test?
If a state or local regulation, on its face or in practice, is discriminatory, then the regulations may be upheld if the state or local gov’t can establish that:
1) an important local interest is served, AND
2) No other non-discriminatory means are available to achieve that purpose.
Discriminatory regulation has rarely been upheld. In the few instances where they are upheld, an important, non-economic health and safely interest is at stake, such as prohibiting the importation of a non-local fish that may contaminate local waters.
What is the market-participant exception to the DCC?
A state my behave in a discriminatory fashion if it is acting as a market participant (buyer or seller) as opposed to a market regulator. If a state is a market participant, it may favor local commerce or discriminate against nonresident commerce as could any private business. (Such as a state-owned cement plant only selling to in-state buyers during a shortage.)
what is the Traditional government function exception?
State and local regulations may favor state and local government entities, though not local private entities, when those entities are performing a traditional government function, such as waste disposal. ‘
Ex: an ordinance may require all trash haulers to deliver to a local public waste-treatment plant, but not to a local PRIVATE facility. Or, a sate may discriminate against OOS interests when raising money to fund state and local government projects. (So a case upheld a state income tax exemption for income earned on state and local bonds, but not on OOS bonds)
What is the Subsidy exception to the DCC?
A state may favor its own citizens when providing for subsidy, such as OOS tuition vs instate tuition.
What is the congressional-permitted discrimination exception to the DCC?
Because Congress has exclusive authority over interstate commerce, it may explicitly permit states to act in ways that would otherwise violate the DCC.
Ex: state tax only on OOS insurance companies upheld when Congress had enacted a state law permitting states to regulate insurance in any manner consistent with federal statutes.
NOTE: It must be unmistakeable clear that Congress intended to permit otherwise impermissible state regulation. Congress must expressly allow or “affirmatively contemplate” such state legislation. The fact that the state policy appears to be consistent with federal policy or that the state policy furthers the goals that Congress has in mind is sufficient.
What is in Undue Burden on Interstate Commerce Balancing test?
A state regulation that is not discriminatory may still be struck down as unconstitutional/violating the DCC if it imposes an undue burden on interstate commerce. The courts will balance, case by case, the objectives and purpose fo the state law against the burden on interstate commerce and evaluate whether there are less restrictive alternatives. If the benefits of the state law are grossly outweighed by the burdens on interstate commerce, then even nondiscriminatory regulation may be struck down. This balancing test is not a cost- benefit analysis or a form of close scrutiny of economic regulation.
Can states, under the DCC, regulate ‘extraterritorial’ conduct?
No; under the DCC states may not regulate conduct that occurs wholly beyond their borders. This, Connecticut could not require that beer sold in Connecticut not be priced higher than beer sold in any of the four neighboring sates, because the Connecticut regime had the effect of regulating beer prices in those states.
What is the general rule for states taxation of commerce under the commerce clause?
Much as with regulation, the states may tax interstate commerce only if Congress has not already acted in the particular area and if the tax does not discriminate against or unduly burden interstate commerce.
How does the Supreme Court determine whether a state tax on interstate commerce comports with the commerce clause?
The SC applies a four-part test to determine whether a state tax on interstate commerce comports with the commerce clause:
1) Substantial Nexus
2) Fair apportionment
3) Nondiscrimination
4) Fair relationship to services provided
So Fair, No Fair
This is the Complete Auto test
Under the Complete Auto test, what is the Substantial Nexus element?
There must be a substantial nexus between the activity being taxed and the taxing state. A substantial nexus requires significant (i.e. more than minimum) contacts with, or substantial activity within, the taxing state. In one case, mailing of catalogs and shipment of goods to consumers in a state is not a sufficient nexus.
Under the Complete Auto test, what is the fair apportionment element?
The tax must be fairly apportioned according to a rational formula (such as taxing only the state’s portion of the company’s business), such that interstate commerce does not pay total taxes greater that local commerce by virtue of having to pay tax in more than one state. The burden is on the tax paying business to prove unfair apportionment
Under the Complete Auto test, what is the nondiscrimination element?
The tax may not provide a direct commercial advantage to local businesses over their interstate competitors (unless Congress specifically authorizes such a tax). A tax that is neutral on its face may still be unconstitutional if its effect is to favor local commerce.
Ex: a tax affecting all milk dealers, the revenue from which went to a fund used to subsidize in-state dairy farmers, violated the commerce clause
Also, the denial of tax exemption to a state entity unless the entity operates primarily for the benefit of state residents may be unconstitutional.