State Immunity from Federal Regulation Flashcards

1
Q

Anti-Commandeering Doctrine

A
  1. Congress can regulate state authorities like it does private actors via the Commerce Clause Power (Garcia v. San Antonio) example: labor standards.
  2. Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative process of the states by compelling them to enact or enforce a federal regulatory program, but they CAN encourage them to act by withholding federal funding.
  3. Congress cannot compel state officials to participate in administration of federal programs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can Congress regulate state authorities like it does private actors via the Commerce Clause?

A

yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can Congress compel state officials to participate in the administration of federal programs?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did the Garcia v. San Antonio Metro Transit Authority decision establish?

A

Congress can regulate state authorities like private actors under the Commerce Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the political process check mentioned in Garcia v. San Antonio?

A

Federalism limits are enforced through state participation in federal government, not the 10th Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does the Spending Power interact with state regulation (per South Dakota v. Dole)?

A

Congress can encourage states to regulate by withholding federal funding. Congress may condition the receipt of federal funds by states subject to the following four limitations: the exercise of the spending power must be for the “general welfare”; the conditions on the receipt of funds must be unambiguous; conditions must be related to a federal interest in a particular national project or program; and conditions must not violate any other constitutional provisions such as the Tenth Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why was the “Take Title” provision unconstitutional in New York v. United States?

A

It coerced states into legislating, violating the Anti-Commandeering Doctrine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the issue and decision in Printz v. United States?

A

The federal government required state CLEOs to conduct background checks under the Brady Act. Congress cannot compel state officials to administer federal programs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Can federal statute require that state officials administer federal law?

A

no – the executive branch must administer federal law; any other mandate would violate constitutional structure, regardless of the burden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly