State crime Flashcards

1
Q

What are state crimes?

A

When the government commits a criminal act which may be against either domestic or international law
- genocide, terrorism, torture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are human rights crime?

A

Offences which violate human rights according to international law
- torture or war crimes
Have to have been condoned y the state or their authority, or be built into part of their policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who is the state?

A

A nation under a government
- all bodies seek to achieve a monopoly of legitimate use of force
- affect who is liable to be held responsible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is considered a state or human rights crime?

A

Result of treaties, conventions and international agreements
- UN declaration of human rights set out a universal set of HR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What 4 types of state crime had McLaughlin developed?

A

1- Political
2- Security and police forces
3- Economic
4- Social and cultural

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How are state crimes prosecuted or punished?

A

1- International forces placing sanctions on states
- UN responding to international concerns
- ending Iraq-Iran war in the 80s
2- Members of the states putting pressure on the government to act
- people in one nation could pressure their gov to put action into place affecting another nation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does Roth criticise how state crime are punished?

A

X Despite the impact and harm caused by state crime, they still remain bot under-researched and under-prosecuted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the 4 reasons as to why state crimes are under-researched and under-prosecuted?

A

1- Laws vary across nations
2- Who monitors and prosecutes?
3- Difficult to trace who is accountable
4- Ideology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

1- Laws vary across nations

A

Can be justified by government, but disapproved by a wider international community, hard to gain support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2- Who monitors and who prosecutes?

A

Roth- ‘how can the state be a criminal actor, when legally the state itself defines criminal behaviour?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

3- Difficult to trace who is accountable

A

Challenging to separate layers of people and actions involved in crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

4- Ideology

A

Chomsky argues that people don’t speak up/put pressure on states because they may not be aware they are happening
Secondly, because education teaches us not to question authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 4 explanations for state crimes?

A

1) The authoritarian personality
2) Crimes of obedience
3) The culture of denial
4) Modernity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

1) The authoritarian personality

A

Adorno- willingness to obey the orders of superiors without question
- argue in WW2 many Germans had this personality due to punitive, disciplinary socialisation patterns
- often thought people who carry out torture/genocide must be psychopaths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can we criticise The authoritarian personality?

A

X no research
Arendts - study of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann showed him to be relatively normal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

2) Crimes of obedience

A

State crimes are crimes of conformity
- require obedience to a higher authority, R suggests many people are willing to obey authority, focus on social conditions
1- Authorisation
- moral principles replaced
2- Routinisation
- act routine, detached
3- Dehumanisation
- enemy portrayed as sub-human

17
Q

3) The culture of denial

A

Alvarez- growing impact of international human rights, more pressure on states
Cohen- states have to make greater efforts to conceal, justify and re-label crime
3 stages of ‘Spiral of denial’
1- ‘it didn’t happen’, media and V show it did
2- self-defence not murder ‘if it did it is something else’
3- ‘it is justified even if its what you say’
e.g. to fight the war on terror

18
Q

4) Modernity

A

Nazi holocaust represented a breakdown of modern civilisation
Bauman- certain features of modern society has made the holocaust possible
- division of labour- no one felt fully responsible
- bureaucratisation normalised killing
- instrumental rationality
- science and technology

19
Q

Evaluation of state crime

A

X How do we draw a line using this transgressive approach
- everyone would agree that torture causes harm, but does the absence if heath and safety regulations always cause harm
X Discussion on human rights ethnocentric
- reduced Ws rights in Iraq are part of their norms and values
- argue it is a crim just because it doesn’t fit our Western views