Split brain reserach Flashcards

1
Q

Define contralateral

A

Each hemisphere of the brain controls the opposite side of the body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the corpus callosum

A

A thick bundle of 200-300 million myelinated nerve fibres allowing for quick communication between each hemisphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What led to the research of split brain patients

A

Paitients that had thier corpus callosum cut -isolating each hemisphere from the other- reduced epileptic sympotoms and it had few side effects however unusal behaviour and a sense of a loss of agency(feeling of control) led to the research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sperry 1968

A

Conducted a quasi experiment comparing 11 patients who had undergone corepus callostomy using equipment that would project iunformation to each visual fiewld sperrry controlled the information that each emispher had access to. in a series of tests partciipants whould be required to either say what they had seen, draw the objevt or selcetr objects that were hidden from vuew with their hands. sperryu found that informartiom presented to the left hemspjhere could draw or selct the object by using the left hand suggesting the hemisphere are both capable iof acting indpeendetly also supporting that theory that lkanugae cnetres are in the left side of tej brian

Gazzaniga(1983) found that when each hemisoere of splut btrin paiteinets were presented with faces the right hemishphere wa smuch more able to recognise them suggesting that the roight hemisphere os specialised for facial rwcgonition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluations cons:

A

The sample used was small and you cnnot generalise the findings on the rest of the population as their brains mayve been abnormal also the comparison group in sperrys reserahc were not people who had history with epeleptic fits so the comparison is invalid

The paitets used did no have the same level of disconnetion betwen hemisphere which coyuldve reuslted in more comunciation between hemiphere then suggested

His paitents had undergone durg therapies which couldve ingluced results

The tasks used lacked mundane realims reulsitng in low external validity as the ffects only show up in highly artificial situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluations pros

A

Reserach on split brain paiteints has had a fiuncadmental impact on tgh epsychloigsl and philospical undertandifn of both the unitty of consciousness and identity suggesting that the brain is a combination of separate intelligent processes woring togther

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Hemispheric Lateralisation

A

The fact that the two halves of the brain are functionally different and that each hemisphere has functional specialisations, e.g. the left is dominant for language, and the right excels at visual motor tasks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How do the two hemispheres communicate

A

Via the corpus callosum-a bridge of nerve fibres that send signals between the hemispheres

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the issues caused when the corpus callosum is cut

A

It interrupts how we process information the hemispheres specialise in. The brain operates contralaterally; the left side controls the right side of the body, and the right side controls the left side of the body.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Give an example of hemispheric lateralisation (language)

A

Broca’s area, residing in the left hemisphere (specifically the left frontal lobe), is an example of hemispheric lateralisation. When damage occurs in Broca’s area, speech production is affected. However, speech production remains unaffected when the same place in the right hemisphere is damaged.

Wernicke’s area, like Broca’s, is associated with language. Wernicke’s area is responsible for making speech meaningful, as damage to this area results in fluent but meaningless speech. Patients with damage to this area can often speak with the right tones and inflections that you would find in a typical, healthy speech pattern, but the content of their words doesn’t make sense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly