Spine Flashcards
The images shown depict the standing posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of a 64-year-old woman with adult degenerative scoliosis who underwent a decompressive laminectomy and fusion from L2-5. She now reports progressive lower back pain and a feeling of being shifted forward and to the left side. If surgical intervention is considered, correction of which of the following is most likely to improve her health-related quality of life outcomes?
Answers:
A. Sacral slope
B. Coronal balance
C. Sagittal balance
D. Coronal cobb angle
E. Pelvic Tilt
Sagittal balance
Discussion:
Correction of the patient’s positive sagittal balance is most likely to improve her health-related
quality of life outcomes. Severity of symptoms increases in a linear fashion with progressive
positive sagittal balance. This correlation was not noted for coronal alignment. Relative kyphosis is
poorly tolerated in the lumbar spine. Pelvic tilt and sacral slope are measurements to be
considered when planning to correct a sagittal balance issue; however, these do not answer the
question asked. The sacral slope is the angle between the horizontal plane and the cephalad
endplate of the S1 vertebra. Cobb angle is a measurement of the degree of scoliosis in the coronal
view.
References:
Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of positive
sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2024-2029.
Pubmed Web link: https://journals-lww-com.geihsl.idm.oclc.org/spinejournal/Fulltext/2005/09150
/The_Impact_of_Positive_Sagittal_Balance_in_Adult.5.aspx
Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR. Correlation of radiographic parameters
and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 15;30(6):682-688.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15770185/
What is the most common cause of symptoms from a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula?
Answers:
A. Venous hypertension
B. Spinal epidural hematoma
C. Spinal subarachnoid hemorrhage
D. Intraparenchymal spinal cord hemorrhage
E. Neurovascular compression
Venous hypertension
Discussion:
Spinal arteriovenous malformations are classically divided into 4 types:
1) Dural root sleeve arteriovenous-fistula
2) Intramedullary glomus AVM
3) Intramedullary/extramedullary AVM + paraspinal juvenile AVM
4) Intradural perimedullary arteriovenous-fistula
Symptoms from spinal dural AV-fistulas typically arise from venous hypertensive myelopathy.
Venous congestion causes outflow obstruction from the spinal cord. This subsequently causes
spinal cord edema with myelopathic signs and symptoms. Spinal dural AV-fistulas are treated by
either super-selective endovascular embolization or microsurgical ligation of the shunting zone.
References:
Sucuoğlu H, Aktürk A. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: A rare cause of progressive myelopathy
and bladder and bowel dysfunction. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 May 18;66(2):219-222. doi:
10.5606/tftrd.2020.3732. PMID: 32760901; PMCID: PMC7401687
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32760901/
Jablawi F, Mull M. The clinical value of venous drainage in patients with spinal dural arteriovenous
fistula. J Neurol Sci. 2019 Feb 15;397:50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.12.024. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
PMID: 30590341
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30590341/
Which of the following methods is used to calculate pelvic incidence?
Answers:
A. Angle between a line vertical from the mid femoral point and a line to the posterior cranial endplate of S1 from the mid femoral point
B. Angle between a line drawn from the midpoint of the femoral heads to the midpoint of the superior endplate of S1 and a line perpendicular vertical from the midpoint of the femoral heads
C. Angle between the line perpendicular to the middle of the cranial sacral end plate and the line joining the middle of the cranial sacral endplate to the center of the midpoint of the femoral heads
D. The angle between the cranial end plate of L1 and caudal endplate of L5
E. Angle between the horizontal line and the cranial sacral end plate
Angle between the line perpendicular to the middle of the cranial sacral end plate and the line joining the middle of the cranial sacral endplate to the center of the midpoint of the femoral heads
Discussion:
Pelvic incidence (normally approximately 50 degrees) is the angle between the line perpendicular
to the middle of the cranial sacral end plate and the line joining the middle of the cranial sacral
endplate to the center of the midpoint of the femoral heads. The angle between the cranial
endplate of L1 and caudal endplate of L5 is one way to describe the lumbar lordosis (normally
20-40 degrees). Some suggest incorporating the cranial endplate of S1 to account for the lordosis
achieved at the L5-S1 space. Pelvic tilt (normally 10-25 degrees) is the angle between a line
drawn from the midpoint of the femoral heads to the midpoint of the superior endplate of S1 and a
line perpendicular vertical from the midpoint of the femoral heads. The angle between the
horizontal line and the cranial sacral end plate is the sacral slope (normally 36-42 degrees). The
angle between a line vertical from the mid femoral point and a line to the posterior cranial endplate
of S1 from the mid femoral point is incorrect; the line to the midpoint of the cranial endplate of S1
would be pelvic tilt.
References:
Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, et al. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance
of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Feb;87(2):260-7.
Pubmed Web link: https://journals-lww-com.geihsl.idm.oclc.org/jbjsjournal/Fulltext/2005/02000
/Radiographic_Analysis_of_the_Sagittal_Alignment.4.aspx
Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, et al. Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the
setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2013
Jun 1;38(13):E803-812
The nerve roots in a lipomyelomeningocele typically lie in which of the following locations?
Answers:
A. Within the fat
B. Dorsal and lateral
C. Ventral and lateral
D. Dorsal and medial
E. Ventral and medial
Ventral and lateral
iscussion:
The type of spinal lipoma described, a lipomyelomeningocele, is where part of the distal conus
extends into the extraspinal compartment, dragging with it a small collar of dural sac. The basic
structure is that of either a transitional or a dorsal lipoma. Dorsal lipoma is found entirely on the
dorsal surface of the lumbar spinal cord, always sparing the distal conus. Junctional demarcation (the fusion line) is between the lipoma, cord, and pia and can be traced in an oval track separating the fat from the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) and the dorsal nerve roots laterally. A transitional lipoma is similar to a dorsal lipoma but involves the conus; neural tissue is always ventral to this interface (i.e., on the side of the nerve roots exit), and the DREZ and the nerve roots are predictably localizable lateral and ventral to the fusion line and therefore do not course through the fat.
References:
Albright, A. L., Adelson, P. D., & Pollack, I. F. (2008). Principles and practice of pediatric
neurosurgery. New York: Thieme.
Web link: https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/ovid/principles-and-practice-of-pediatricneurosurgery-13926
Pang D, Zovickian J, Wong ST, Hou YJ, Moes GS. Surgical treatment of complex spinal cord
lipomas. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013 Sep;29(9):1485-513. doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2187-4. PMID:
24013320.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24013320/
Which of the following treatment modalities is associated with the greatest risk of morbidity and mortality for patients older than 75 years of age who have type II odontoid fractures?
Answers:
A. rigid orthosis/hard collar
B. Posterior C1-C2 fusion
C. Odontoid screw fixation
D. Halo vest immobilization
E. Soft collar
Halo vest immobilization
Discussion:
Placement of elderly patients with type 2 odontoid fractures in halo-vest immobilization is
associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality at 30 days after injury compared to
either operative intervention or rigid cervical orthosis. A large North American study showed that
surgical treatment of type II odontoid fracture in an elderly population did not negatively impact
survival, even after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities. The data suggest a significant 30-
day survival advantage and a trend toward improved longer-term survival for operatively treated
over non-operatively treated patients.
References:
Tashjian RZ, Majercik S, Biffl WL, Palumbo MA, Cioffi WG. Halo-vest immobilization increases
early morbidity and mortality in elderly odontoid fractures. J Trauma. 2006 Jan;60(1):199-203. doi:
10.1097/01.ta.0000197426.72261.17. PMID: 16456456.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16456456/
Chapman J, Smith JS, Kopjar B, Vaccaro AR, Arnold P, Shaffrey CI, Fehlings MG. The AOSpine
North America Geriatric Odontoid Fracture Mortality Study: a retrospective review of mortality
outcomes for operative versus nonoperative treatment of 322 patients with long-term follow-up.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):1098-104. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318286f0cf. PMID:
23354104; PMCID: PMC3678887.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23354104/
Which of the following materials has been supported with significant clinical data to have equal or superior fusion rates when compared with those of an iliac crest autograft?
Answers:
A. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM)
B. Synthetic bone graft
C. Bone morphogenic protein (rhBMP-2)
D. Platelet rich gels
E. Femoral head allograft
Bone morphogenic protein (rhBMP-2)
Discussion:
Bone Morphogenic Protein, or BMP, has been shown to have equal or superior fusion rates when
compared with those of an iliac crest autograft. The morbidity associated with iliac crest harvesting
has led to efforts to assess bone graft alternatives. BMP is FDA-approved for use in anterior
lumbar interbody fusion, and has been shown to yield fusion rates of 95% to 100%. All other
answer choices (synthetic bone grafts, platelet gels, allograft, and DBM) have been shown to have
similar or worse fusion rates compared to fusion rates of iliac crest autograft.
Synthetic bone grafts with beta tricalcium phosphate, for example, have been shown to only act as
a scaffold, showing fusion rates as low as 0% when used alone compared to 67% when autograft
was used in conjunction.
Platelet gels contain platelet rich plasma and are osteoconductive. Iliac crest autograft fusion rates
alone have been shown to be 91%, compared to 62% when combined with platelet gels. Another
study showed a 25% non-union rate in the platelet gel group vs 17% non-union rate in the iliac
crest group.
DBM has been shown to have a fusion rate of 83% compared to iliac crest fusion rate of 85%, with
no statistical difference, although significant clinical data is lacking.
Allografts, such as from the femoral head, have been shown to have a fusion rate of 70%
compared to 92% fusion rates with autologous iliac bone. Some studies show similar fusion rates,
but significant clinical data is lacking.
References:
Rihn J, Kirkpatrick K, Albert TJ. Graft options in posterolateral and posterior interbody lumbar
fusion. SPINE 2010: 35(17) 1629-1639
Pubmed Web link: https://journals-lww-com.geihsl.idm.oclc.org/spinejournal/Fulltext/2010/08010
/Graft_Options_in_Posterolateral_and_Posterior.9.aspx
Kaiser MG, Groff MW, Watters WC 3rd, Ghogawala Z, Mummaneni PV, Dailey AT, et al. Guideline
update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.
Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes as an adjunct for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine.
2014 Jul;21(1):106-32
The pain afferents from the skin have their first synapse in which of the following?
Answers:
A. Posterolateral Nucleus of Thalamus
B. Geniculate Ganglion
C. Spinal Nucleus
D. Stellate Ganglion
E. Dorsal Root Ganglion
Spinal Nucleus
Discussion:
The correct answer is the Spinal Nucleus of the Trigeminal Nerve in the Pons/Medulla.
In the pain pathway, first order pseudo-unipolar neurons are located in peripheral ganglia such as
Dorsal Root Ganglia (DRG) for spinal nerves, Trigeminal Ganglion and the Geniculate Ganglion for
the Facial (VII) nerve. Second order neurons are located in the dorsal horn (Rexed Laminae III-V)
of the spinal cord. Lamina III-IV are referred to as the Nucleus Proprius, the location of the first
synapse in the pain pathway within the spinal cord. This extends more cephalad into the brainstem
in the form of the Spinal Nucleus of Trigeminal Nerve. The Pars Caudalis subdivision specifically is
responsible for the transmission of pain and temperature relayed from Cranial nerves V, VII, IX,
and X, and project through the spinal tract to the thalamus. Interneurons in the Substantia
Gelatinosa of Rolando (SGR) - also referred to as Rexed Lamina II- correlate with their role in pain
modulation. 3rd order neurons are in the Thalamus (posterolateral nucleus) with projections to the
somatosensory cortex. Alternatively, some second order neurons synapse in the Reticular
formation instead (indirect route), with reticulo-thalamic tracts projecting to the thalamus instead.
The Stellate Ganglion (cervico-thoracic ganglion) is a sympathetic chain ganglion with efferent preganglionic (2nd order neuron) fibers originating from the Intermediolateral horn neurons (T1-L3),
and synapsing with post-ganglionic fibers (3rd order neuron) that continue around the carotid and
vertebral arteries.
References:
Carpenter MB. Core Text of Neuroanatomy. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1991: 86-87.
Pain and Disability: Clinical, Behavioral, and Public Policy Perspectives. Institute of Medicine (US)
Committee on Pain, Disability, and Chronic Illness Behavior; Osterweis M, Kleinman A, Mechanic
D, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1987.
Pubmed Web link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219252/
A 34-year-old man presents with a progressive thoracic myelopathy. The MR image shown depicts a mural nodule with an associated cyst. The mural nodule enhances with gadolinium. Preoperative hematocrit is 51%. The most appropriate initial management step is:
Answers:
A. Observation and 6 month follow-up MRI
B. Biopsy and stereotactic radiosurgery
C. Lumbar puncture
D. Abdominal images and catecholamine assessment
E. External beam radiotherapy and physical therapy
Abdominal images and catecholamine assessment
Discussion:
Approximately 25-33% of patients harboring a hemangioblastoma have Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)
disease. In patients with suspected VHL, diagnostic workup of the neuraxis and retina should be
undertaken to look for additional hemangioblastomas. VHL carries a significant risk of
development of both renal cell carcinoma and pheochromocytoma. Due to the risk of sudden
catecholamine release from surgery, VHL patients should have a screening abdominal ultrasound
or CT scan. The MR imaging in this case is not typical for multiple sclerosis or other demyelinating
diseases, therefore MRI of the brain and spinal tap are not indicated. Hemangioblastomas of the
spinal cord are benign tumors with a distinct border between tumor and spinal cord. They may be
cured by total surgical excision. Therefore, external beam radiotherapy and/or conservative
management are not indicated. Open biopsy is an option, but once the diagnosis of
hemangioblastoma is confirmed, gross total excision should be undertaken.
References:
Korf BR. The phakomatoses. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2004 May;14(2):139-48, vii. doi:
10.1016/j.nic.2004.03.008. PMID: 15182812.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15182812/
Maher ER, Kaelin WG Jr. von Hippel-Lindau disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 1997
Nov;76(6):381-91.
A 45-year-old man with an eight-week history of persistent, subacute, lower back pain is prescribed light duty and rest. On follow-up, the pain persists. Neurological examination and MR imaging show no abnormalities. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Answers:
A. Interventional pain management for consideration of facet injections, epidural steroid injections, & facet rhizotomies
B. Acute inpatient rehabilitation with 2 weeks focus on range of motion exercises, back and core muscle strengthening exercises, massage therapy and aquatic therapies
C. Physical therapy, massage therapy, gait retraining and narcotic prescription for management of low back pain
D. Interventional pain management and medical pain management referrals for consideration of lumbar injections and medication management to avoid narcotics
E. Intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise therapy, acupuncture, massage therapy, spinal manipulation, yoga, & cognitive-behavioral therapy
Intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise therapy, acupuncture, massage therapy, spinal manipulation, yoga, & cognitive-behavioral therapy
Discussion:
The most appropriate next step in management is intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise
therapy, acupuncture, massage therapy, spinal manipulation, yoga, and cognitive-behavioral
therapy. These interventions would not require an inpatient acute rehab stay. This patient has
subacute low back pain and has not maximized his conservative management options. Prior to
considering any invasive procedures, including interventional pain management injections, and
prior to considering the addition of narcotic medications, conservative, non-invasive therapies must
be attempted. Moreover, it would be difficult for any targeted injections to be prescribed to this
patient with a reasonable degree of proposed symptomatic relief without significant MRI findings.
References:
Chou R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the
American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2; 147
(7): 478-491.
Pubmed Web link: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.7326
/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&
rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org
A 19-year-old man is in the ICU two days after experiencing an American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale A cervical spinal cord injury. Surgical intervention is not planned in the near future. Which of the following is the most appropriate treatment for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis at this time?
Answers:
A. Mechanical prophylaxis now and pharmacological prophylaxis after 72 hours after injury
B. Surveillance lower extremity ultrasounds only
C. Mechanical prophylaxis only
D. Pharmacological prophylaxis and mechanical prophylaxis within 72 hours of injury
E. There is no evidence for need for DVT prophylaxis in this population
Pharmacological prophylaxis and mechanical prophylaxis within 72 hours of injury
Discussion:
Multiple literature reviews and current clinical guidelines (including current CNS spinal cord injury
guidelines) support early deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis in patients with acute spinal
cord injury. This patient population is particularly vulnerable to thromboembolic events due to direct
tissue trauma, associated traumatic injuries, and functional immobility secondary to spinal cord
injury. Early thromboprophylaxis is recommended and may include mechanical prophylaxis with
lower extremity compression devices as well as pharmacological agents such as heparin or
enoxaparin. A 2017 clinical practice guideline by Fehlings et al., recommends using either low
dose unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin within 72 hours of injury.
References:
Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Aarabi B, Anderson P, Arnold PM, Brodke DS, Burns AS, Chiba K,
Dettori JR, Furlan JC, Hawryluk G, Holly LT, Howley S, Jeji T, Kalsi-Ryan S, Kotter M, Kurpad S,
Kwon BK, Marino RJ, Martin AR, Massicotte E, Merli G, Middleton JW, Nakashima H, Nagoshi N,
Palmieri K, Singh A, Skelly AC, Tsai EC, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Yee A, Harrop JS. A Clinical
Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury:
Recommendations on the Type and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis. Global Spine J.
2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):212S-220S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217702107. Epub 2017 Sep 5. PMID:
29164026; PMCID: PMC5684841.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29164026/
Arnold PM, Harrop JS, Merli G, Tetreault LG, Kwon BK, Casha S, Palmieri K, Wilson JR, Fehlings
MG, Holmer HK, Norvell DC. Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis for
the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A
Systematic Review. Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):138S-150S. doi:
10.1177/2192568217703665. Epub 2017 Sep 5. PMID: 29164021; PMCID: PMC5684847.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29164021/
Which of the following lateral plain film measurements of the cervical spine is used to make the diagnosis of atlanto-occipital dislocation?
Answers:
A. Odontoid angular ratio
B. Jefferson’s ratio
C. Condylar gap
D. C1-2 interspinous gap
E. Rule of Spence
Condylar gap
Discussion:
Atlanto-occipital dislocation is often the result of a high velocity trauma resulting in a ligamentous
disarticulation of the cranium relative to the spinal column. It can easily be missed on radiographic
imaging. While it is more reliable to identify AO-dislocation on CT scans, it is important to be aware
of the plain film radiographic measurements used for diagnosis. There are some limitations to the
accuracy of interpretation of these diagnostic measurements on lateral plain films as opposed to
CT. A fairly reliable method, however, is to examine the degree of distraction between the occipital
condyle and the C1 lateral mass. This measurement is called the condylar gap (AKA condyle-C1
interval). The occipital condyle and C1 lateral mass should be closely apposed. Visible distraction
on lateral plain films should be confirmed with a CT scan. In adults, a condylar gap of >3mm on CT
scan is considered abnormal. It is important to assess the coronal films, as there is often some
element of asymmetry of the O-C1 joints in AO-dislocation. These findings can further be
confirmed with an MRI scan, which would reveal STIR signal hyperintensity within the O-C1 joints.
Widening of the C1-2 interspinous space may be appreciated radiographically when there is
significant injury to the atlanto-axial complex. However, it is not indicative of atlanto-occipital
dislocation.
The Rule of Spence is applied when assessing the integrity of the transverse cruciate ligament, not
the atlanto-axial ligamentous complex. On an open-mouth odontoid view, >7mm overhang of the
C1 lateral mass relative to C2 is indicative of an injury to the transverse cruciate ligament.
Jefferson’s ratio and the odontoid angular ratio are not reflective of applied measurements
described in the literature.
References:
Pang D, Nemzek WR, Zovickian J. Atlanto-occipital dislocation–part 2: The clinical use of
(occipital) condyle-C1 interval, comparison with other diagnostic methods, and the manifestation,
management, and outcome of atlanto-occipital dislocation in children. Neurosurgery. 2007
Nov;61(5):995-1015; discussion 1015. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000303196.87672.78. PMID:
18091277
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18091277/
Dziurzynski K, Anderson PA, Bean DB, Choi J, Leverson GE, Marin RL, Resnick DK. A blinded
assessment of radiographic criteria for atlanto-occipital dislocation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005
Jun 15;30(12):1427-32. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166524.88394.b3. PMID: 15959373
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15959373/
A type 1 odontoid fracture most likely indicates an avulsion injury of which of the following structures?
Answers:
A. Transverse ligament
B. Ligamentum flavum
C. Posterior longitudinal ligament
D. Tectorial membrane
E. Apical ligament
Apical ligament
Discussion:
Type 1 odontoid fractures are fractures of the rostral tip of the odontoid process that may be
associated with avulsion injury to the apical ligament. The apical ligament attaches from the top of
the odontoid process to the basion. Disruption of this attachment can result in craniocervical
instability. The transverse ligament attaches the odontoid process to the anterior arch of C1.
Ligamentum flavum attaches adjacent lamina to each other. The tectorial membrane (otherwise
known as the tectorial ligament) is an extension of the posterior longitudinal ligament the connects
the posterior aspect of the odontoid and C2 vertebral body to the basion and C3 vertebral body.
The posterior longitudinal ligament connects the posterior surface of adjacent vertebral bodies and
provides significant biomechanical support of a motion segment.
References:
Tubbs RS, Kelly DR, Humphrey ER, Chua GD, Shoja MM, Salter EG, Acakpo-Satchivi L, Wellons
JC 3rd, Blount JP, Oakes WJ. The tectorial membrane: anatomical, biomechanical, and histological
analysis. Clin Anat. 2007 May;20(4):382-6. doi: 10.1002/ca.20334. PMID: 16617439.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16617439/
Carvalho AD, Figueiredo J, Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR, Rodrigues-Pinto R. Odontoid Fractures: A
Critical Review of Current Management and Future Directions. Clin Spine Surg. 2019
Oct;32(8):313-323. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000872. PMID: 31464693.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31464693
A 66-year-old man is evaluated because of leg weakness, unsteadiness, and inability to walk effectively. Examination shows strength in all lower extremity muscle groups is 5/5 and he has normal sensation to light touch in both lower extremities. He is slow in getting up from a seated position and has an unsteady, wide-based gait. An MR image of the lumbar spine is shown. Which
of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
Answers:
A. MRI of the cervical spine without gadolinium
B. No further imaging, physical therapy, gait retraining & close follow up
C. MRI of the brain, cervical, and thoracic spine without and with gadolinium
D. MRI of the lumbar spine with gadolinium
E. Repeat MRI of the lumbar spine without gadolinium in 6 months
MRI of the cervical spine without gadolinium
Discussion:
The most appropriate next step in management would be to obtain an MRI of the cervical spine.
The patient’s signs and symptoms suggest myelopathy. An MRI of the cervical spine without
gadolinium would be the best test to assess for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. This may reveal
cervical spondylosis, multilevel central and foraminal stenosis with spinal cord compression and
possible findings of T2 changes suggestive of cord edema or myelomalacia. The MRI of the
lumbar spine shown reveals moderate lumbar spondylosis without any significant central canal
stenosis or cauda equina nerve root compression. The findings in this patient may also be from
pathologies in the thoracic spine, but these are statistically less common. Conservative
management with physical therapy, close monitoring and repeat MRI in 6 months of the lumbar
spine would not be appropriate.
References:
Salvi FJ, Jones JC, Weigert BJ. The assessment of cervical myelopathy. Spine J. 2006 NovDec;6(6 Supplement):182S-189S.
Harrop JS, Naroji S, Maltenfort M, et al. Cervical myelopathy: a clinical and radiographic evaluation
and correlation to cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 10. Epub
ahead of print
A 75-year-old woman with severe back pain has no abnormalities on neurological examination. X-ray films are shown. She was never diagnosed with scoliosis during her childhood or adolescence. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
Answers:
A. Congenital scoliosis
B. Neuromuscular scoliosis
C. Idiopathic scoliosis
D. Scheuermann’s kyphosis
E. Degenerative scoliosis
Degenerative scoliosis
Discussion:
The patient’s x-rays show a thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis and severe kyphosis. Without a prior
diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis, and without any congenital malformations – such as tethered
cord, Klippel-Feil, etc. – this patient is best categorized as a degenerative scoliosis.
Neuromuscular scoliosis is mainly a pediatric diagnosis in children with cerebral palsy and other
neuromuscular disorders. Scheuermann’s Kyphosis is a distinct pattern of mid-thoracic kyphosis
with wedging of multiple vertebrae, often without a scoliosis. For this to be an “idiopathic” scoliosis,
she would have to have a diagnosis of AIS or an earlier diagnosis as a young adult of adult
idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS). Of note, these are AP x-rays, and scoliosis films are often viewed in the
PA (posterior-anterior) manner, where left is left and right is right, such that the heart is on the left
side of the screen. Also of note, it is crucial to assess the lumbosacral fractional curve in these
patients, which is the coronal Cobb angle from L4 to the sacrum, (though can be measured from
L3 or L5). This patient has a left concavity lumbosacral fractional curve. Although this particular
patient has no radicular symptoms, patients are often symptomatic on the concavity of the
lumbosacral fractional curve due to foraminal stenosis causing lumbar radiculopathy. It is important
to note that globally (assessing head to pelvis), she is maligned in the sagittal and coronal planes.
Her SVA is approximately 7-9cm, and coronally her head centered to the left of her pelvis.
References:
Oskouian RJ Jr., Shaffrey CI. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2006
Jul;17(3):299-315, vii.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/16876030/
Birknes JK, White AP, Albert TJ, Shaffrey CI, Harrop JS. Adult degenerative scoliosis: a review.
Neurosurgery. 2008 Sep;63(3 Suppl):94-103. PMID: 18812938
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/188129
A ruptured intervertebral disc at C6-7 most commonly causes:
Answers:
A. Weakness in elbow extension
B. Diminished brachioradialis reflex
C. Diminished finger-jerk reflex
D. Hypoesthesia in fingers 4 and 5
E. Weakness in the hand intrinsic muscles
Weakness in elbow extension
Discussion:
A C6-7 disc herniation compresses the C7 nerve root which will cause weakness in elbow
extension, diminished triceps reflex and hypoesthesia in digits 2 and 3. Hand intrinsic muscles,
sensation in digits 4 and 5, and finger-jerk reflex are supplied by C8. Brachioradialis is mainly
supplied by C6 (Table).
References:
.
Cervical disk
herniation
C4-5 C5-6 C6-7 C7-T1
Compressed nerve root C5 C6 C7 C8
Diminished reflex Deltoid & pectoralis Biceps & brachioradialis Triceps Finger-jerk
Motor weakness Deltoid Elbow flexion Elbow
extension
Hand
intrinsics
Hypoesthesia and
paresthesia Shoulder
Upper arm,
thumb, radial
forearm
Fingers 2 &
3,
all
fingertips
Fingers 4 &
5
Sharrak S, Al Khalili Y. Cervical Disc Herniation. [Updated 2021 Sep 3]. In: StatPearls [Internet].
Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546618/
Web link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546618/
Greenberg, M. S. (2020). Handbook of Neurosurgery. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers
Pubmed Web link: https://www.thieme.com/books-main/neurology/product/5411-handbook-ofneurosurgery
A 38-year-old man is evaluated because of a six-month history of lower back pain that improves with exercise but worsens with rest. He reports having stiffness and pain in the morning. Medical history includes uveitis, fatigue, loss of appetite, and weight loss. Active spinal range of motion is limited on flexion and lateral bending. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
Answers:
A. Ankylosing spondylitis
B. Transverse myelitis
C. Multiple sclerosis
D. Metastatic spine disease
E. Guillain-Barre syndrome
Ankylosing spondylitis
Discussion:
The history suggests ankylosing spondylitis (AS). AS is a form of arthritis that leads to long-term
inflammation in the joints of the spine and is associated with genetic factors. Most (85%) have
specific human leukocyte antigen HLA-B27. The underlying mechanism is autoimmune or
autoinflammatory, which is associated with other systemic issues including weight loss, fatigue,
uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, sacroiliitis, and arthropathy of the shoulders and hips. Back
pain is a common complaint and can occur in the setting of a partially fused or entirely fused spine,
either in the neck or the back. Patients with AS can have severe sagittal deformity and require a
major spinal reconstruction in both the cervical spine and thoracic/lumbar spine. AS patients can
also have very severe fractures due to the large moment arms above and below the fracture site.
Cancer is less likely in this patient due to his age and because most pathologic fractures have
mechanical pain, whereas AS pain is not mechanical because the entire spine (or portions of the
spine) are fused. Multiple sclerosis (MS) leads to vision loss and double vision, as well as
relapsing-remitting upper motor neuron symptoms. Guillain-Barre syndrome causes ascending
weakness after a viral infection or vaccination. Transverse myelitis causes acute neurologic deficit
form a spinal cord demyelinating plaque.
References:
Jacobs WB, Fehlings MG. Ankylosing spondylitis and spinal cord injury: origin, incidence,
management, and avoidance. Neurosurgical Focus. 2008; 24(1): E12.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/18290738/
Teunissen FR, Verbeek BM, Cha TD, Schwab JH. Spinal cord injury after traumatic spine fracture
in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Dec;27(6):709-716.
PMID: 28984512
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/28984512/
A 65-year-old woman undergoes multilevel osteotomies, decompression, T10 to pelvis fixation, and fusion for correction of a kyphoscoliotic deformity. At six months postoperatively, which of the following radiographic parameters best correlates with improved clinical outcome?
Answers:
A. Lumbosacral fractional curve
B. Sacral slope
C. Sagittal vertical axis
D. Pelvic incidence
E. Thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angle
Sagittal vertical axis
Discussion:
The answer to this question is the sagittal vertical axis (SVA). The patient has kyphoscoliosis –
kypho (kyphotic area of her spine) and scoliosis (a curvature to the bottom of the
thoracolumbar/lumbar spine). Since she was treated with a T10-pelvis fusion, her scoliosis likely
does not extend rostral to the lumbar spine. The fact that she had kyphosis likely means she is
leaning forward, which puts stress on the lumbar musculature and is associated with low back
pain. Several papers have documented that sagittal alignment (how far your head or C7 is over
your femoral heads and pelvis), is associated with quality-of-life metrics. There are other pelvic
parameters that are also associated with quality-of-life metrics and clinical outcome, such as pelvic
tilt, but this is not an answer choice here. If the pelvic tilt is high (>20°-25°), patients are likely
retroverting their pelvis, which indicates they are compensating for sagittal malalignment. The T1-
pelvic angle (T1PA) is another surrogate for sagittal alignment. For this question, sagittal
alignment, measured by SVA, is the answer here. Other measurements certainly affect quality of
life, but less so than the SVA. For example, global coronal alignment – coronal vertical axis (CVA)
– is measured by the difference in the coronal C7-plumb line and the central sacral vertical line
(CSVL), a line drawn up from the sacrum. Coronal malalignment can be associated with
decreased quality of life, but research has shown that coronal measurements matter less than
sagittal alignment. The same is true for regional Cobb angle, such as the lumbosacral fractional
curve (coronal Cobb angle from L4-sacrum). This can be associated with foraminal compression
and radiculopathy.
References:
Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, et al. Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the
setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013
Jun 1;38(13):E803-12.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/23722572/
Smith JS, Singh M, Klineberg E, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Schwab FJ, Protopsaltis T, Ibrahimi D,
Scheer JK, Mundis G Jr, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Deviren V, Kebaish K, Hart R, Burton DC, Bess S,
Ames CP; International Spine Study Group. Surgical treatment of pathological loss of lumbar
lordosis (flatback) in patients with normal sagittal vertical axis achieves similar clinical improvement
as surgical treatment of elevated sagittal vertical axis: clinical article.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):160-70. PMID: 24766290.
A 68-year-old woman is evaluated because of progressive neck pain and high cervical myelopathy. Cervical imaging studies are shown in Figures 1-6. Serum alkaline phosphatase and urinary hydroxyproline excretion levels are elevated. In addition to the dorsal decompression with craniocervical internal fixation and fusion shown in Figure 7, which of the following is the most
appropriate adjuvant treatment for this disorder?
Answers:
A. Radiation
B. Colchicine
C. Steroids
D. Methotrexate
E. Zoledronic Acid
Zoledronic Acid
Discussion:
The correct answer is Zolendronic Acid. Paget’s disease of the bone is a disorder of accelerated
osteoclastic bone resorption and reactive osteoblastic bone remodeling. The result is overall
weaker bone that can cause pain or lead to fracture with neural element compromise. Diagnosis of
Paget’s disease includes laboratory studies with evidence of elevated serum Alkaline Phosphatase
levels, and elevated urinary hydroxyproline. A bone scan can reveal increased uptake in affected
areas, with monostotic and polyostotic subtypes. In the spine, the lumbar region (L4 and L5) is the
most frequently involved region (58%), more so than the thoracic (45%) and the cervical spine.
The vertebral body is almost always affected with varying involvement of the posterior bony
elements. CT shows evidence of bone expansion and remodeling, while MRI shoes replacement
of bone marrow. On x-rays and CT, affected vertebrae are sclerotic and dense, a so called “ivory
vertebra” appearance. Osteosarcoma transformation is very rare in the spine (0.7%).
Bisphosphonates are the mainstay of treatment, with the second line being Calcitonin in patients
with bisphosphonate intolerance. Surgical intervention is indicated for neural element compression
or fracture associated spinal instability. Pre and post operative bisphosphonate therapy is
recommended. There is a 25% risk of perioperative complications in this population.
Radiation, steroids, Colchicine, and Methotrexate have no role in Paget’s disease.
References:
Reid IR, Lyles K, Su G, Brown JP et al. A single infusion of zoledronic acid produces sustained
remissions in Paget disease: data to 6.5 years. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Sep;26(9):2261-70. doi:
10.1002/jbmr.438.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21638319/
Jorge-Mora A, Amhaz-Escanlar S, Lois-Iglesias A, et al. Surgical treatment in spine Paget’s
disease: a systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol . 2016 Jan;26(1):27-30.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26126588/
Dell’Atti C, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Lalam RK et al. The spine in Paget’s disease. Skeletal Radiol.
2007 Jul;36(7):609-26.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17410356/
A 16-year-old girl is evaluated because of pain in the lower back and right leg. She reports urinary frequency and urgency. Photographs of her lower back are shown. Which of the following spinal anomalies is the most likely cause of her symptoms?
Answers:
A. Teratoma
B. Spinal dermal sinus
C. Normal variant
D. Tethered cord
E. Split cord malformation
Split cord malformation
Discussion:
Two-thirds of patients with split cord malformation have overlying skin abnormalities such as tuft of
hair (hypertrichosis), nevi, lipomas, dimples, and hemangiomas. All these cutaneous abnormalities
should trigger work-up of this pathology clinically. Sacral appendages are associated with spinal
teratomas, while coccygeal pits are normal variants (though patients with this abnormality should
be evaluated for any underlying lesions). Y-shaped clefts and sacral dimples can signify tethered
cords or dermal sinus tracts, respectively.
There are two types of split cord malformation. In Type I SCM, the spinal cord is formed of
hemicords; each has its own central canal, pia, and dura. In type I SCM, both dural tubes are
separated by a rigid osseocartilaginous (bony) median septum. Type II SCM (which is referred to
as diplomyelia) is also formed of two hemicords within a single dura, separated by a nonrigid
fibrous median septum. Both groups are associated with spina bifida occulta, and in both groups
each hemicord has its own nerve roots. Treatment includes untethering of the cord at the level of
the spina bifida occulta and occasionally at the level of the split. In type I SCM, never untether the
cord until the bony septum is removed to avoid retraction of the cord against the bony septum.
References:
Mahapatra AK, Gupta DK. Split cord malformations: a clinical study of 254 patients and a proposal
for a new clinical-imaging classification. J Neurosurg. 2005 Dec;103(6 Suppl):531-6. doi:
10.3171/ped.2005.103.6.0531. PMID: 16383252.
Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16383252/
Pang D, Dias MS, Ahab-Barmada M. Split cord malformation: Part I: A unified theory of
embryogenesis for double spinal cord malformations. Neurosurgery. 1992 Sep;31(3):451-80. doi:
10.1227/00006123-199209000-00010. PMID: 1407428.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1407428/
Which of the following is the most common cause of an incomplete cervical central cord syndrome?
Answers:
A. Penetrating trauma
B. Disc herniation
C. Tumor
D. Distraction injury
E. Hyperextension injury
Hyperextension injury
Discussion:
Central cord syndrome is usually a result of acute hyperextension injury in older patients in the
presence of osteophytic spurs and redundant ligamentum flavum. The injury most often occurs
with a blow to the upper face or forehead. The syndrome is thought to result from edema within the
vascular watershed zone in the central region of the spinal cord. Within the corticospinal tracts, the
upper extremities are represented more medial than the lower extremities. Consequently, patients
classically present with significantly greater motor deficit in the upper extremities than the lower.
Sensory disturbance is variable and can be present below the level of the lesion due to the
ascending spinothalamic tracts.
Anterior cord syndrome is often secondary to a dislocated bone fragment or traumatic disk
herniation resulting in anterior cord compression or occlusion of the anterior spinal artery. This
presents with loss of motor, pain, and temperature below the level of the lesion with preservation of
dorsal column functions. Posterior cord syndrome, which is relatively rare, is due to selective injury
or ischemia to the dorsal columns, and produces sensory ataxia, as well as decreased vibration
and light touch. Mild weakness of the upper extremities can also occur. Brown-Sequard syndrome
is also referred to as spinal cord hemisection and is usually secondary to penetrating rather than
blunt trauma. The findings include ipsilateral motor paralysis, loss of dorsal column function below
the level of the lesion, and contralateral loss of pain and temperature sensation 1-2 segments
below the lesion.
References:
Avila MJ, Hurlbert RJ. Central Cord Syndrome Redefined. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021
Jul;32(3):353-363. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 May 7. PMID: 34053723.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34053723/
Hashmi SZ, Marra A, Jenis LG, Patel AA. Current Concepts: Central Cord Syndrome. Clin Spine
Surg. 2018 Dec;31(10):407-412. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000731. PMID: 30346310.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30346310/
During orbitozygomatic osteotomy, which of the following nerve branches is most likely to require release from its bony foramen?
Answers:
A. Supraorbital nerve
B. Abducens nerve
C. Abducens nerve
D. Oculomotor nerve
E. Frontalis branch of the facial nerve
Supraorbital nerve
Discussion:
During orbitozygomatic craniotomy, the limits of exposure include the supraorbital notch medially
and the frontozygomatic suture laterally. If a more medial orbitotomy is required, the supraorbital
nerve can be mobilized from its foraminal notch and retracted with the scalp. The frontalis branch
of the facial nerve is protected during elevation of the scalp flap, most effectively with a subfascial
technique near the subgaleal fat pad. The supraorbital nerve provides sensory innervation for the
frontal scalp, forehead, and upper eyelid, and injury to the nerve can result in supraorbital
neuralgia, with intense, unilateral pain the forehead and superior orbit, often with a fluctuating
course.
References:
Modifications to the orbitozygomatic approach. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003.
Nov;99(5):924-930.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14609176/
The work horse of skull base surgery: orbitozygomatic approach. Technique, modifications, and
application. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25(6):E4.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19035702/
Sjaastad O, Petersen HC, and Bakketeig LS. Supraorbital neuralgia. Vaga study of headache
epidemiology. Cephalgia, 2005. 25(4):296-304.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15773827/
Which of the following structures forms the anterosuperior margin of the foramen of Monro?
Answers:
A. Fornix
B. Septum pellucidum
C. Choroid plexus
D. Thalamus
E. Roof of the third ventricle
Fornix
Discussion:
The foramen of Monro is located at the junction of the third ventricle roof and anterior wall. It is
bounded anterosuperiorly by the junction of the column and body of the fornix, and by the
thalamus posteriorly. The choroid plexus, distal branches of the medial posterior choroidal arteries,
thalamostriate vessels, superior choroidal arteries and septal veins all pass through the foramen of
Monro. Injury to the fornix can occur during a third ventriculostomy, though there are limited reports
in the literature. In a series of 94 patients undergoing third ventriculostomy, gross injury to the
fornix was observed in 5 patients; while injury to the right fornix can result in impaired visuo-spatial
memory, these 5 patients had no clinical symptoms. These injuries primarily occurred when placing
the rigid endoscope through a sheath that was placed blindly and too deep, allowing for injury
during passage of the endoscope. Additionally, care should be taken intraoperatively for stability of
the endoscope so as to avoid any traction on the fornix.
References:
The foramen of Monro: a review of its anatomy, history, pathology, and surgery. Childs Nerv Syst.
2014. Oct;30(1):1645-9.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25079886/
Microsurgery of the third ventricle: Part I. Microsurgical anatomy. Neurosurgery. 1981.
Mar;8(3):334-56.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7242883/
Kehler U, Regelsberger J, and Gliemroth J. The mechanism of fornix lesions in 3rd
ventriculostomy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2003. 46(4):202-4.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14506562/
A 3-month-old girl is being evaluated because of a midline lumbar dimple. An MR scan of the spine is shown. She is at greatest risk for which of the following conditions?
Answers:
A. Hydrocephalus
B. Syringomyelia
C. Scoliosis
D. Meningitis
E. Tethered cord
Meningitis
Discussion:
T2-weighted sagittal MRI imaging of the whole spine shows a sacral dermal sinus (hypointense
tract) coursing cephalad as it dives inward from the skin surface. Lumbosacral dermal sinuses are
a potential pathway for intradural infection with a significant risk of bacterial meningitis (76.4%). It
may even result in an intrathecal abscess. Furthermore, the sinus lining contains normal skin
appendages that may result in hair, desquamated epithelium, sebum, and cholesterol within the
tract. If the skin appendages enter the dura, it can irritate the dura leading to sterile chemical
meningitis. Although 25% of sacral dermal sinuses regress to just a dimple, it is recommended to
explore and excise the lumbosacral dermal sinuses before developing signs of infection or
neurologic deficit. The surgical technique consists of an ellipse cut around the sinus opening then
dissection around the sinus tract until its termination. If the tract penetrates into the spinal canal,
laminectomy is performed. If the tract continues intradurally, the dura is opened and inspected for
any intradural lesions. If a dermoid cyst is present, debulking from within is the method of choice to
avoid spilling cyst contents intradurally to avoid recurrence, chemical meningitis, and arachnoiditis.
References:
Au H. Recurrent meningitis in a child due to an occult spinal lesion. CMAJ. 2006;175(7):737.
doi:10.1503/cmaj.060163
Web link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569937/
Powell KR, Cherry JD, Hougen TJ, Blinderman EE, Dunn MC. A prospective search for congenital
dermal abnormalities of the craniospinal axis. J Pediatr. 1975 Nov;87(5):744-50. doi:
10.1016/s0022-3476(75)80298-8. PMID: 1185339.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1185339/
Which of the following is the most effective treatment for an isolated type II odontoid fracture in an otherwise healthy 60-year-old man?
Answers:
A. Treatment only if the patient has neck pain
B. Surgical fixation
C. Nonoperative management in a rigid cervical collar
D. Nonoperative management in halo immobilization
E. Nonoperative management in a soft cervical collar with serial radiographic evaluation
Surgical fixation
Discussion:
There is no Class I medical evidence on the management of patients with acute traumatic odontoid
fractures.
Class II medical evidence: risk of nonunion of a type II odontoid fracture in patients ≥ 50 years of
age is 21 times greater than for younger patients with a similar type II odontoid fracture. Therefore,
consideration of surgical stabilization and fusion for type II odontoid fractures in patients ≥ 50 years
of age is recommended.
Treatment of type II odontoid fractures with a cervical collar alone or traction followed by cervical
collar immobilization is associated with lower fracture union rates.
If nonoperative treatment is undertaken, factors associated with type II odontoid fracture nonunion
are any of the following: age greater than 50, dens displacement of ≥ 5 mm, change in angulation
of the odontoid fracture by ≥ 5° on lateral radiography taken at 2 weeks after immobilization,
comminuted fracture pattern, or inability to maintain fracture alignment with external orthosis.
The management of odontoid fractures in elderly patients is associated with increased failure
rates, and higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients irrespective of the
treatment offered.
References:
Ryken TC, Hadley MN, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Gelb DE, Hurlbert RJ, Rozzelle CJ, Theodore N,
Walters BC. Management of isolated fractures of the axis in adults. Neurosurgery. 2013 Mar;72
Suppl 2:132-50. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318276ee40. PMID: 23417186.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23417186/
Rizvi SAM, Helseth E, Rønning P, Mirzamohammadi J, Harr ME, Brommeland T, Aarhus M,
Høstmælingen CT, Ølstørn H, Rydning PNF, Mejlænder-Evjensvold M, Utheim NC, Linnerud H.
Odontoid fractures: impact of age and comorbidities on surgical decision making. BMC Surg. 2020
Oct 14;20(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00893-7. PMID: 33054819; PMCID: PMC7556921.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33054819/
Which of the following factors most commonly determines instability of C1 fracture (Jefferson fracture)?
Answers:
A. Number of fracture sites in the C1 ring
B. Transverse ligament integrity
C. Concomitant C2 pars fracture
D. Concomitant odontoid fracture
E. Concomitant occipital condylar fracture
Transverse ligament integrity
Discussion:
A Jefferson fracture is a burst-type fracture of the C1 ring caused by an axial loading injury. The
mechanical stability of a Jefferson fracture depends largely on the integrity of the transverse
atlantal ligament (TAL). Two common mechanisms to assess the integrity of the transverse
ligament are the rule of Spence and Dickman’s criteria.
The rule of Spence is a method for assessing the transverse ligament by measuring the sum of the
overhang of the lateral masses of C1 over C2 on AP/open-mouth odontoid view x-ray or on
coronal CT scan. If the sum overhang (left and right added together) is greater than or equal to
7mm then the transverse ligament is presumed to be disrupted.
Dickman’s criteria utilizes fine-cut CT scan and MRI to evaluate injury to the transverse ligament.
Type 1 injuries have visual damage to the ligament fibers and are recommended to be treated
surgically due to the decreased likelihood of ligamentous healing. Type II injuries have avulsion of
the ligament at the C1 osseous insertion site, and over 70% of these healed with external cervical
orthosis treatment.
A hangman’s fracture is a bilateral fracture through the pars of C2 and is characterized by the
extent of C2-3 displacement and/or angulation, as well as the presence of C2-3 facet or disc
disruption. Odontoid fractures involve a fracture of a portion of the dens and are classified by a
fracture line through either the dens tip (type I), base (type II), or the C2 body (type III). Occipital
condyle fractures are classified as non-displaced linear condyle fracture (type I), extension of a
basilar skull fracture (type II), or condyle fracture with alar ligament avulsion (type III). None of
these other C1 or C2 fractures play a role in determining the stability of a C1 fracture.
References:
Liu P, Zhu J, Wang Z, Jin Y, Wang Y, Fan W, Liu M, Zhao J. “Rule of Spence” and Dickman’s
Classification of Transverse Atlantal Ligament Injury Revisited: Discrepancy of Prediction on
Atlantoaxial Stability Based on Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Treatment for Atlas Fractures.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 1;44(5):E306-E314. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002877.
PMID: 30222691.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30222691/
Woods RO, Inceoglu S, Akpolat YT, Cheng WK, Jabo B, Danisa O. C1 Lateral Mass Displacement
and Transverse Atlantal Ligament Failure in Jefferson’s Fracture: A Biomechanical Study of the
“Rule of Spence”. Neurosurgery. 2018 Feb 1;82(2):226-231. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx194. PMID:
28431136.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28431136
A 24-year-old woman is evaluated for right arm and leg weakness and left abducens nerve palsy immediately after being involved in a motor vehicle collision. X-ray film of the lateral cervical spine shows pre-vertebral soft tissue swelling of the upper cervical spine and a basion-dental interval of 16 mm. CT scan of the head shows no intracranial hemorrhage. Which of the following is the most appropriate management of this patient?
Answers:
A. Flexion-extension xrays to assess for instability
B. Halo placement
C. Rigid cervical collar placement
D. Operative intervention for internal fixation and arthrodesis
E. Obtain MRI brain
Operative intervention for internal fixation and arthrodesis
Discussion:
This patient is exhibiting clinical and radiographic signs of atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD). The
most appropriate treatment option is internal fixation and arthrodesis. Traumatic AOD frequently
results in death at the time of injury. Surviving patients may present with a normal neurological
exam, but often present with hemiparesis or quadriparesis.
Cranial nerve palsies may also be seen due to traction on the brainstem. This injury is extremely
unstable and patients frequently deteriorate without timely occipitocervical instrumentation.
Traynelis has classified these injuries as Type I (anterior), Type II (longitudinal), Type III (posterior),
and other types (lateral, rotational, or multidirectional). The basion-axial-interval (BAI)-basiondental-interval (BDI) of Harris is an accepted method of diagnosing atlanto-occipital dislocation on
a lateral cervical x-ray. The BAI is the distance from the basion to a line drawn along the posterior
wall of the C2 vertebral body. A distance of more than +12 mm indicates a Type I injury while a
distance of -4 mm or more indicates a Type III injury. A BDI greater than 12mm is also abnormal
and is consistent with a Type II AOD. An additional finding on imaging studies is upper cervical
prevertebral soft tissue swelling.
Because of the degree of dislocation and instability associated with this injury, external bracing
(including halo) is a poor management option. The use of traction in these highly unstable injuries
is generally contraindicated and can lead to death. The best management option is immediate
operative intervention for occipito-cervical instrumentation and arthrodesis.
References:
Theodore N, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Gelb DE, Hurlbert RJ, Rozzelle CJ, Ryken TC, Walters BC,
Hadley MN. The diagnosis and management of traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation injuries.
Neurosurgery. 2013 Mar;72 Suppl 2:114-26. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827765e0. PMID:
23417184.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23417184/
Joaquim AF, Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR. Traumatic Atlanto-Occipital Dislocation-A
Comprehensive Analysis of All Case Series Found in the Spinal Trauma Literature. Int J Spine
Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):724-739. doi: 10.14444/8095. Epub 2021 Jul 21. PMID: 34289992; PMCID:
PMC8375687.
Pubmed Web link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34289992/