Spinal Trauma Flashcards
must be cleared first for stability before
other views are attempted
Lateral cervical view
before ruling out
significant spinal injury don’t perform what views?
flexed and extended views
often required to fully
evaluate cervical spinal injury
Reconstructed CT scanning w/o contrast
Prevertebral (retropharyngeal & retrotracheal) soft tissues
evaluation
(significant indicator of underlying cervical injury)
Adults: no more than 22-mm at C6-C7 and no more than 7-mm at C2
soft tissue thickness at C2 should measure less than
50% of vertebral body width
At C6 or C7 soft tissues should measure less than the width of the
adjacent vertebral body
is loss of cervical lordosis is a reliable
indication of injury?
NO
seen in >20% of normal cervical radiographs
Absent lordosis
may cause flattening and/or reversal of lordosis
Post-traumatic cervical muscle spasm or
DDD
A reliable way to evaluate alignment of C/S is to look at what 4-lines?
- Anterior vertebral line
- Posterior (George’s) vertebral line
- Spinal laminar line
- Posterior spinous process line
may strongly indicate disruption of the
PLL, capsular and interspinous ligaments
Posterior disc space widening and fanning of the spinous
processes esp. at C3-C6
may indicate marked rotational
deformity and facet dislocation
Abrupt change in facet orientation
“double
SP sign” indicating
SP avulsion
C2-Odontoid normally it tilts ____ slightly
back
If the Odontoid leans more anterior, suspect
odontoid fracture
In adults C1-C2 distance on lateral view is approx.
2.5-mm
(should not
increase on flexion)
In children the C1-C2 distance may be up to
5-mm and may change by 1-2-mm in flexion
In children C1 lateral masses may slightly
overhang
what system can establish if the fracture is stable or unstable?
3-column Denis classification system
How can we establish if the fracture is stable or unstable?
stable fracture if only 1-column is injured
most spinal fractures may
involve some component of
flexion injury
S.C.I.W.O.R.A.
serious trauma including cord damage w/o radiographic
abnormality
posterior arch, Jefferson “burst” fracture, anterior arch lateral
mass fractures
C1-atlas
Hangman’s, Odontoid process, teardrop fracture
C2-axis
compression wedge or burst, flexion teardrop, pillar, isolated
lamina & TP, Clay Shoveler’s fractures
C3-C7
potentially unstable upper cervical injury
Occipital condyle fracture
x-ray may miss this
Occipital condyle fractures may be encountered more frequently due to
MVA injuries
Usually associated with severe injuries to facial skeleton and the
skull due to significant trauma
Occipitovertebral dissociation (less common but often fatal)
m/c fracture of the Atlas (>50%)
Bilateral fracture of the posterior arch of C1
Bilateral fracture of the posterior arch of C1 should not be confused with
Jefferson C1 fracture
mechanism of a bilateral fracture of the posterior arch of C1
extension/compression of the C1 arch by the occiput
• Relatively stable injury but may have >80% association with other
cervical fractures
Bilateral fracture of the posterior arch of C1
burst fracture of C1
Jefferson fracture
represents an osseous ring that ossifies between 3-6 years of
age (an may fracture)
burst fracture of C1 (Jefferson fracture)
“diving head first”, compression of occipital condyles
into lateral masses of C1
burst fracture of C1 (Jefferson fracture)
overhanging C1 masses, if >6-mm combined, suspect
transverse
ligament damage and marked instability
may occur due flexion or extension or a
combination of forces
Odontoid process fracture
less common, involves avulsion of the tip. May be unstable
contrary to some views
Type 1 - Odontoid process fracture