Spinal Surgery Flashcards

1
Q

Degenerative cervical spinal disease

A

A broad term encompassing a number of pathologies resulting in structural changes in the joints i.e. the intervertebral disc, facet joints and the uncovertebral joints which can potentially lead to compression of neural structures, deformity, pain and disability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Factors affecting the rate of degenerative change

A

Load and intensity of use over time

Smoking, genetics, localised trauma, infection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pathophysiology of degenerative cervical spinal changes

A

Intervertebral discs bear the load of the head and neck.

Axial loading through the nucleus pulposus of the disc is converted to hoop stresses acting on the annulus fibrosus and the vertebral endplates.

This alters the cellular composition of the nucleus pulposus with reduction in hydrophilic proteoglycans and increased collagen.

The mechanical properties of the disc change with the loss of intervertebral height and cracks and fissures appearing predisposing to the pulposus herniation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Consequences of altered mechanical stresses in degenerative cervical spinal disease

A

Transferred to the facet joints leading to segmental hypermobility with osteophytic spurs deposited in an adaptive remodelling process meant to confer increased stability.

Ligamentous hypertrophy also occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Commonest levels affected by degenerative cervical spinal disease

A

C5/6

C6/7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cause of neural compression in the cervical spine of patients <55

A

Tends to be soft disc prolapse encroaching into the spinal canal or the neural exit foramina causing myelopathy or radiculopathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cause of neural compression in the cervical spine of patients >55?

A

Osteophytes and thickened annulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Morphology of the degenerated cervical spine

A

Alters normal cervical lordosis leading to straightening or the adoption of kyphotic, hyperlordotic or scoliotic curvatures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

At what degree of stenosis of the spinal canal does myelopathy result?

A

Reduction in the cross-sectional area >30%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Normal cervical canal diameter

A

18mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Normal cervical cord diameter

A

10mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to cord injury in degenerative cervical myelopathy

A

Static compression results in direct trauma and chronic cord ischaemia

Dynamic compression results from excessive translational movements.

Neuroinflammatory response triggers a cascade of cellular events causing demyelination of the corticospinal tract, central grey matter degeneration with loss of interneurons, anterior horn cell atrophy and gliosis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Symmetrical involvement of motor and sensory tracts

Bilateral weakness below the affected level

Paraesthesia, numbness, tingling and sensory loss with a discrete sensory level

A

?Cervical myelopathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Examination findings in DCM

A

Increased tone

Brisk and pathological reflexes

Symptoms of difficulty with sphincter control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Symptom progression in DCM

A

Insidious onset with steady deterioration in hand control, progressive clumsiness, gait unsteadiness, falls.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the most common clinical presentation of degenerative cervical disease?

A

Radiculopathy from compression of a nerve root

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Motor and sensory deficits with reduced deep tendon reflexes in the distribution of the affected nerve root

Pain with associated reduced movements radiating into the arm as brachalgia

Positive root compression tests can reproduce pain

A

?Cervical radiculopathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Ix in diagnosis of degenerative cervical disease

A

MRI

Dynamic cervical spine radiographs can assist in operative planning

CT may be useful for assessing the degree of osteophytosis and the extent of foraminal stenosis

Myelography has excellent sensitivity for detecting SC compression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Surgical decompression in DCM

A

Indicated in most patients because the majority deteriorate over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Timing of intervention in DCM

A

Earlier intervention in symptomatic cervical myelopathy is associated with improved outcomes.

Chronic neurological deficit is unlikely to improve.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Conservative vs surgical Mx of cervical radiculopathy

A

RCTs have shown that surgery rapidly improves symptoms but in the long term PT and Sx are equally effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Aim of surgical decompression in DCM?

A

Halt disease progression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Outcomes in DCM decompression

A

60-70% of patients improve

30% have stable disease

10% continue to progress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Outcomes in surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy?

A

90% have improvement in arm symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

OPLL

A

Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

OLF

A

Ossification of ligamentum flavum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Pathophysiology of OPLL and OLF

A

NIDDM, IGT, excessive weight gain, hypoPTHism and hypophosphataemic rickets all implicated.

More common in Japan.

Ectopic bone forms within the ligaments, with ossification, ligamentous hyperplasia, cell proliferation and vascular ingrowth seen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Classification of OPLL

A

Based on CT findings

Hirbayashi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Hirayabashi classification of OPLL

A

a) Continuous type
b) Segmental
c) Circumferential (confined to disc space)
d) Mixed type

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Impact of OPLL on surgery

A

Complicates anterior surgical decompression and dramatically increases the risk of intraoperative durotomy.

When ossification bridges the disc spaces, segmental mobility is reduced and the PLL fuses with thecal sac.

Posterior approach is inidcated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Pathology of RA

A

Involves novel antigenic expression by synovial cells, leading to persistent cellular activation and immune complex production (RF- IgM).

Cytokine mediated chronic inflammation is initiated (IL-1, 6, TNF-alpha)

Results in granulation deposition within the synovium (rheumatoid pannus) which produces proteolytic enzymes capable of destroying adjacent cartilage, ligaments, tendons and bone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Consequence of RA in the cervical spine

A

Destructive synovitis leads to ligamentous laxity and bony erosions with subsequent instability and subluxation.

Compression of neural structures can result from instability or from direct pannus compression.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Why are the upper cervical articulations primarily affected in rheumatoid cervical spinal disease?

A

Occiput/C1 and C1/2 because the normal ligamentous structures surrounding the occipito-atlantoaxial region conferring its significant strength and stability are degraded as part of the disease process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What are the most common cervical spine pathologies in RA

A

C1/2 instability (65%)

Basilar invagination (20%)

Subaxial subluxation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Cause of C1-2 instability (atlantoaxial subluxation)

A

Results from the destruction of the transverse, apical and alar ligaments e.g. from rheumatoid pannus.

Also occurs in AS, achondroplasia, Down’s syndrome, Morquio’s syndrome and secondary to trauma.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Radiographic features of atlantoaxial subluxation

Plain XR

A

In a non-traumatic setting flexion and extension views may be performed. The expected distance between anterior arch of C1 and the dens in the fully flexed position should be <3 mm in an adult (~5 mm in a child).

In a vertical subluxation, the dens is often above the McGregor line by over 8 mm in men and 9.7 mm in women.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q
A

Atlantoaxial subluxation

Normal ADI in adults should be <3mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q
A

Atlantoaxial subluxation

On CT, C1 is not orientated in line with the head. The head may be pointed anteriorly, C1 is turned. If this is a fixed defect, C2 is rotated in conjunction with C1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Indications for surgical stabilisation of atlantoaxial subluxation

A

Asymptomatic with ADI >8mm

All patients with cervical myelopathy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Normal posterior atlanto-dental interval?

A

>14mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Basilar erosion

A

Occurs from erosion of occiput/C1 and C1/2 joints such that the dens migrates into the foramen magnum

May present with HCP, syringomyelia, progressive myelopathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Chamberlain’s line

A

Extends from the hard palate to the opisithion (back of the foramen magnum)

The dens should be <3mm above this line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

McGregor’s line

A

Extends from the hard palate to the most caudal point of the occipital curve

The dental tip should be <4.5mm above this line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

McRae’s line

A

Drawn from the basion (front of the foramen magnum) to the opisthion (back of the foramen magnum)

The odontoid tip should not be above this line, is normally 5mm below.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Additional use of McRae’s line

A

Used to diagnose Chiari 1 malforamations where the cerebellar tonsils are seen to descend more than 3mm in children or 5mm in adults, below this line.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What is the difference between basilar impression and basilar invagination

A

The basilar impression is caused by softening of the bones of the skull base rather than migration of the dens upwards due to ligamentous instability

There can be brainstem compression as a result of the basi-occiput and condylar segment of the occipital bone leading to infolding of the foramen magnum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Causes of basilar invagination

A

Most common is RA

Klippel-Feil

Osteogenesis imperfecta

Achondroplasia

Chiari malformations

Cleidocranial dysostosis

Schwartz-Jaempl Syndrome 2

Morquio’s syndrome

HyperPTH

Osteomalacia

Paget’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Morquio’s syndrome

A

Morquio syndrome, also known as Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IV (MPS IV), is a rare metabolic disorder in which the body cannot process certain types of sugar molecules called glycosaminoglycans (AKA GAGs, or mucopolysaccharides). In Morquio syndrome, the specific GAG which builds up in the body is called keratan sulfate. This birth defect, which is autosomal recessive, is a type of lysosomal storage disorder. The buildup of GAGs in different parts of the body causes symptoms in many different organ systems.[2]:544 In the US, the incidence rate for Morquio is estimated at between 1 in 200,000 and 1 in 300,000 live births.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Klippel Feil syndrome

A

Klippel Feil syndrome (KFS) is a congenital, musculoskeletal condition characterized by the fusion of at least two vertebrae of the neck. Common symptoms include a short neck, low hairline at the back of the head, and restricted mobility of the upper spine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Cleidocranial Dysostosis

A

Cleidocranial Dysplasia (cleido = collar bone, + cranial = head, + dysplasia = abnormal forming), also known as Cleidocranial Dysostosis and Marie-Sainton Disease, is a condition characterized by defective development of the cranial bones and by the complete or partial absence of the collar bones (clavicles).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Schwartz-Jampel syndrome

A

Schwartz–Jampel syndrome (SJS) is a rare genetic disease caused by a mutation in the perlecan gene (HSPG2)[1] which causes osteochondrodysplasia associated with myotonia.[2] Most people with Schwartz–Jampel syndrome have a nearly normal life expectancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Options for surgical treatment of basilar invagination?

A

Traction

Anterior decompression

Craniocervical fusion with or without foramen magnum decompression

53
Q

Basilar invagination with no cranial nerve palsies

A

Posterior fusion is usually adequate.

Preoperative traction may help to predict whether adequate reduction can be achieved intra-operatively.

54
Q

Basilar invagination with cranial nerve palsies

A

Anterior transnasal or transoral resection of the odontoid peg.

55
Q

Def: Platybasia

A

Flattening of the skull base

Usually asymptomatic unless associated with other abnormalities.

Skull base angle is formed by a line joining the nasion with the centre of the pituitary fossa and a line joining the anterior border of the foramen magnum with the centre of the pituitary fossa

Platybasia is present if this angle is >143

56
Q

Basilar kyphosis angle

A

If the angle from lines drawn from nasion to pituitary fossa and then to the anterior border of the foramen magnum is <125 degrees

57
Q

Associations of platybasia

A

Basilar invagination

Achondroplasia

Down’s Syndrome

Chiari malformations

Craniocleidodysostosis

Craniofacial anomalies

Osteogenesis imperfecta

Paget’s

Osteomalacia

Ricket’s

Fibrous dysplasia

HypoPTH

58
Q

Types of seronegative spondyloarthropathies

PEARU

A

P: psoriatic arthritis

E: enteropathic arthritis (i.e. extraintestinal manifestation of IBD)

A: ankylosing spondylitis

R: reactive arthritis (Reiter syndrome)

U: undifferentiated spondyloarthritis

59
Q

Associations of AS

A

HLA-B27 genotype seen in 80-98% of affected pateints

60
Q

Cervical spine manifestations of AS

A

Stiffness from joint and ligament ossification and kyphosis.

Leading to chin on chest deformity.

61
Q

When should surgical correction of AS kyphotic spine be considered?

A

Only if concomitant thoracolumbar and hip/knee joint abnormalities excluded.

AS also leads to bony osteopenia which influences planning of instrumentation

62
Q

Forestier Disease

A

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis

Presence of non-marginal syndesmophytes at three successive levels involving four contiguous vertebrae

Appears radiologically as flowing anterior ossification of the ALL with disc space preservation.

There is an absence of facet joint ankylosis, SI erosion, sclerosis and intra-articular osseous fusion

63
Q

Indications for surgical management of DISH

A

Treated if canal stenosis becomes symptomatic

With large anterior syndesmophytes, dysphagia, stridor and hoarseness of voice may also be rare indications for intervention

64
Q

General principles of anterior cervical approaches

A

Techniques for decompression include discectomy and corpectomy

Following decompression, decision . is made to either fuse the joint (arthrodesis) or to preserve motion (arthroplasty)

In fusion, autograft, allograft or synthetic graft may be used. This may be supplemented with anterior cervical plating.

65
Q

Corpectomy

A

Involves removing some or all of the vertebral body

66
Q

Indications for anterior cervical approach

A

Anterior compression of neural elements

Correction of cervical kyphosis

67
Q

Contraindications to anterior cervical approach

A

Posterior compression

OPLL

Previous anterior cervical surgery and/or neck RTx with or without VC dysfunction should be considered relative contraindications

Asympatomic RLN palsy is common after anterior surgery so redo surgery should be on the same side unless laryngoscopy has proved that both vocal cords are working.

Patients reliant on voice should be counselled about the risk of VC injury.

68
Q

Technical considerations in anterior cervical surgery:

Extensive osteophytes with OPLL

A

May require a corpectomy for more complete decompression

69
Q

Technical considerations in anteiror cervical surgery:

Fusion rates

A

Fusion rates for single level surgery approach 100% but decrease with multilevel discecotmies.

Plating may thus confer a biomechanical advantage

Smoking and NSAIDs may impair fusion

70
Q

Technical considerations in anteiror cervical surgery:

Multilevel corpectomy

A

Associated with a higher rate of implant dislodgement and failure.

Many surgeons thus prefer multilevel discectomies or augment the anterior construct with posterior instrumented fusion to improve biomechanics

71
Q

Technical considerations in anterior cervical approahces

Single level discectomy

A

There is no difference in outcome with decompression alone and decompression with graft.

Not using a graft reduces cost and operative time as well as harvest site pain.

72
Q

What is an advantage of synthetic grafts

A

Morbidity of donor site including pain, infection, haematoma, peripheral nerve injury or irritation.

73
Q

Issues with supplemental anterior plating

A

Adds stability and strength in extension.

Strongest possible anterior surgical construct

Increases incidence of dysphagia

74
Q

Conclusions regarding anterior cervical appraoches

A

No superior in anterior cervical discectomy alone or with cage over ACFG with fusion or corpectomy with fusion.

75
Q

Approach to anterior cervical discectomy

A

Supine

Head ring, with jellyroll under shoulders.

Held tilt can help reduce venous pressure.

Skin incision over the pathological level with radiographic confirmation.

Transverse incision

Platysma divided and undermined.

Superficial cervical fascia and the bloodless avascular plane between SCM and carotid sheath laterally and the trachea and oesophagus medially are used to access the prevertebral fascias.

Important to palpate, identify and protect the carotid sheath.

Prevertebral fascia incised exposing the vertebral bodies, discs and longus colli muscles.

Medial border of longus colli is undermined and elevated.

Confirmation of disc level

Disc space incised and distracted.

Osteophytes removed.

Discectomy is completed with a combination of curettes, rongeurs and a drill.

PLL identified and removed. Dorsal osteophytes must be undercut in myelopathic patients. Neural exit foramina undercut in radiculopathy.

Graft can be used after discectomy.

Closure with dissolvable sutures

Wound drain.

76
Q

Surface landmarks:

C3/4 level

A

Caudal to hyoid bone

77
Q

Surface landmarks:

C4/5

A

Thyroid cartilage

78
Q

Surface landmarks:

C5/6

A

Cricothyorid membrane

79
Q

Surface landmarks:

C6/7

A

Cricoid cartilage

80
Q

Factors determining which side to approach for ACDF?

A

Right RLN takes a less predictable course

On the left the thoracic duct is at risk, especially with low approaches near the cervicothoracic junction.

81
Q

What is the bloodless plane sought during anterior cervical approaches?

A

Between the caroitd and SCM laterally and the trachea and oesophagus laterally.

82
Q

What is this muscle?

What is its innervation?

A

Longus colli

Anterior rami of C2-6

83
Q

What structure should be protected during the retraction of longus colli?

A

The sympathetic chain which is found superficially and 1cm lateral to its medial border

84
Q

What helps identify the PLL

A

Its cranio-caudal orientation

85
Q

Approach to anterior cervical corpectomy

A

As for discectomy

Discectomies are performed at the rostral and caudal level with a central channel of bone removed from the interventing vertebra

A width of 15-18mm is sufficient in most patients for decompression.

A rigid or expandable cage filled with bone graft can be used to reconstruct and restore aloignement

86
Q

Preservation of cervical arthroplasty

A

To preserve segmental kinematics.

87
Q

What are the main complications associated with anterior cervical approach?

A

Hoarsenss

Dysphagia

Haemorrhage

Dural tear

Oesopgageal injury

Paralysis worsening myelopathy

Horner’s syndrome

Infection

Adjacent segment disease

Rare:

Extrusion of graft

Vascular injury (vertebral or carotid artery, jugular vein)

Thoracic duct injury

Death

88
Q

What is the risk of death in anterior cervical approach?

A

0.1%

89
Q

Complications of anterior cervical approach

Incidnece:

Hoarseness of voice

A

4%

90
Q

Complications of anterior cervical approach

Incidence:

Dyphagia

A

10%

91
Q

Complications of anterior cervical approach

Incidence:

Haemorrhage

A

2-3%

92
Q

Complications of anterior cervical approach

Incidence:

Dural tear

A

0.5%

93
Q

Complications of anterior cervical approach

Incidence:

Oesophageal injury

A

<1%

94
Q

Complications of anterior cervical approach

Incidence:

Paralysis worsening myelopathy

A

0.5% up to 5%

95
Q

Complications of anterior cervical approach

Incidence:

Horner’s syndrome

A

<1%

96
Q

Complications of anterior cervical approach

Incidence:

Infection

A

1%

97
Q

Complications of anterior cervical approach

Incidence:

Adjacent segment disease

A

2.9% per annum

98
Q

Anterior cervical approach complication features:

Voice hoarseness

A

Usually, 2o to RLN injury

Compression is thought to occur between retractors and the ETT cuff as the nerve runs in the tracheo-oesophageal groove underneath the inferior constrictor

Deflating and reinflating the ETT after positioning the retractor may reduce this complication.

99
Q

Anterior cervical approach complication features:

Dysphagia

A

Risk factors include multi-level surgery

Older age

High profile plates

Lower levels

Must exclude implant migration

100
Q

Anterior cervical approach complication features:

Haemorrhage

A

Risk factors include:

Absence of post-op drain, inadequate haemostasis

Can precipitate airway obstruction and post-op swelling.

101
Q

Anterior cervical approach complication features:

Dural tear

A

More common in patients with OPLL (up to 25%)

Should be repaired intraoperatively with stitches, clips and fibrin sealant

102
Q

Anterior cervical approach complication features:

Oesophageal injury

A

Risk factors include scarring from previous surgery

Early ENT or UGI involvement

103
Q

Anterior cervical approach complication features:

Paralysis worsening myelopathy

A

Careful positioning and avoid overextension

Avoid over-distraction

Early post-op MRI to exclude haematoma.

104
Q

Anterior cervical approach complication features:

Horner’s syndrome

A

Caused by excessive dissection of longus colli too laterally

Usually resolves

105
Q

Anterior cervical approach complication features:

Infection

A

Risk factors include:

Immunosuppression and oesophageal perforation

Treat with Abx, implants may need removal

106
Q

Anterior cervical approach complication features:

Adjacent segment disease

A

Symptomatic disease requiring treatment is about 2.9% per annum following fusion (1/4 of patients in 10y)

107
Q

When should cervical arthroplasty be considered?

A

Younger patients with predominantly soft disc herniations

108
Q

Contraindications to cervical arthroplasty

A

Inflammatory arthropathy

Infectious arthropathy

OPLL

DISH

Significant osteophytosis

Cervical instability

109
Q

Radiological Ix ahead of cervical arthroplaty

A

Pre-operative CT and dynamic XR in all patients

110
Q

Technical considerations for cervical arthoplasty

A

Identical approach to exposure as anterior cervical discectomy.

Care should be taken to avoid excessive decompression of the uncovertebral joints.

This may cause hypermobility of the treated segment and potential instability and implant failure.

111
Q

What is an issue with excessive bone dust in arthroplasty

A

May increase the risk of post-op osteophyte formation or heterotopic calcification.

112
Q

Types of posterior cervical approach

A

Laminectomy or laminoplasty for foraminotomy

Posterior cervical discecotmy for radiculopathy

113
Q

Indications for posterior cervical approach

A

Hypertrophic ligamentum flavum and facets

Multilevel disease

OPLL

Congenital multilevel canal stenosis

Foraminal decompression

114
Q

What are the benefits of posterior approaches

A

Avoid the risk of hoarse voice, dysphagia and adjacent segment disease.

Maybe preferable in elderly who are more likely to have multilevel disease with posterior cervical instability of less concern.

Supplemental fusion should be considered if there is instability or kyphosis

115
Q

Approach to cervical laminectomy

A

Pone, flexed in a head clamp

Midline exposure through the nuchal ligament

Subperiosteal muscle elevation.

Radiological confirmation of the level

Laminectomy can be performed en bloc by drilling through bilaterally at the lamina-lateral mass junctions.

The ligamentum flavum can be dissected away from the theca to achieve decompression.

Piecemeal removal is another approach.

116
Q

What may result with excessive posterior cervical muscle stripping and adjacent facet joint exposure?

A

Instability and progressive deformity (post-laminectomy kyphosis and swan-neck deformity)

117
Q

What is the lateral limit for cervical laminectomy

A

Medial border of the lateral masses

118
Q

What can cause cervical nerve root compression without myelopathy?

A

Facet joint spondylosis

Uncovertebral osteophytes

Foraminal disc herniation

119
Q

What are some modified posterior cervical exposures

A

Skip laminectomy- alternate standard laminectomies at selected levels allow partial preservation of midline structures

Cervical laminoplasty- spinal canal diameter is augmented by repositioning the laminae and removing the ligamentum flavum

120
Q

Approach to cervical foramintoomy

A

Prone, Mayfield, flexed.

Exposure can involve either ipsilateral muscle stripping or slitting.

The cranial and caudal laminae and the facet overlying the exiting nerve root are exposure.

Radiological confirmation

Fenestration achieved by removing bone from the cranial and caudal lamina and undercutting of the medial facet to decompress the exiting nerve root.

121
Q

What is the limit on facet removal in cervical formainotomy

A

Removal of more than half of the facet compromise the shear strength of the spine

122
Q

Complications of posterior cervical approach

A

Persistent neck pain

Kyphotic deformity

Intraoperative fusion can be considered if concern about instability.

Post-op neurological deficit (commonly C5 palsy)

123
Q

What are the two main techniques for C1/2 stabilisation

A

Magerl’s C1/2 transarticular screw fixation

or

Harms-Goel technique of posterior C1 lateral mass screws with C2 pars/pedicle screws

124
Q

Approach to Margerl’s C1/2 stabilisation

A

A single screw on each side is placed through the pars interarticularis of C2 passing through the C1/2 joint directed at the lateral mass of C1

It provides the most stable and rigid fixation biomechanically of the C1/2 joint with almost complete obliteration of rotation.

125
Q

Contraindication to Magerl’s C1/2 fixation

A

Anomalous high riding vertebral artery

126
Q

Technical considerations of Magerls’s C1/2 transarticular screws

A

Technically demanding with increased risk of vascular injury.

Care must be taken to avoid anterior perforation of the 1 lateral mass which could result in an injury to the pharynx, ICA and or lower cranial nerves.

127
Q

Pre-op Ix for Magerls’

A

CTA

128
Q

Approach to Magerl’s transarticular screws

A

Prone, skull clamp, flexed.

C1 posteiror arch and lateral masses, C2 laminae, C2 pars and C2/3 facet joints are exposed.

Caudal stab incisions may be required to obtain screw trajectory (usually 1-2cm lateral to the C7/T1 spinous process).

C1/2 joint capsule can be opened to denude the articular surface.

Drilling is fluoroscopic guided.

A bone graft can be sited on exposed surfaces to supplement the fusion

Fixation often supplemented with a Dickmann=Sonntag posterior sublaminar wire.