Speech Production Flashcards

1
Q

How to investigate speech production

A

Observation of movements of speech e.g MRI, recordings of natural speech, analysis of natural and experimentally induced speech errors (TMS), neuroimaging (FMRI), genetic e.g FOXP2 KE Family

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Source filter model (Fitch, 2010)

A

Air produced by pulmonary pressure-> larynx where vocal folds vibrate -> filtered by superlayrngeal gyrus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Phonetics is the

A

Study of speech sounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are consonants classified by

A

Voicing, Place and Manner e.g plosives- b, g, t: compressed air forces open closed vocal folds in larynx
Manner= stops and burst release followed by vowel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Vowel classification

A

Horizontal/vertical and high/low/ middle e.g ‘E’= front (horizontal) and mid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MRI to measure speech production

A

Allows study of whole vocal tract with good soft tissues contrast and resolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Support for MRI to measure speech production

A

Ventura et al (2009): provided useful morphological data about position and shape of different speech articulators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

EPG to measure speech production

A

Displays timing and location of tongue contact with roof of mouth during continuous speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is EPG used?

A

Custom made artificial palette which contains electrodes that register tongue contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Goal of measuring speech production

A

Further our understanding of normal and abnormal speech production and improving QoL for individuals with impaired communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fisher et al (1998) KE Family study

A

Fisher et al (1998): KE family

  • 15 members across 3 generations could understand spoken words but struggled to string words together to form response
  • mutated FOXP2 gene
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Genetic basis of complex vocal articulation- family finding

A

Mutations in FOXP2 gene interfered with the part of the brain responsible for language development learning problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Watkins et al (2002) study on family members with aphasia

A

Family members and patients had similar profiles of impairment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Stages to speaking

A
  • activation of a concept
  • selection of correct syntactic structure and words
  • activation of a phonetic code
  • coordination of many muscles to produce articulatory output
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Partial reason for no single all-inclusive model of speech production

A

Limited access to process as it occurs with our consciousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

All models of speech production agree

A
  • How linguistic components are retrieved and assembled during continuous speech
  • linguistic information represented by distinctive units and hierarchy of levels
17
Q

Simple model of speech production (cognitive- levelt et al., 1999)

A

Conceptualisation, formulation and articulation

18
Q

Schriefers et al (1990): Evidence for simple model of speech production

A

Semantically related EARLY= slower to name picture
Phonologically related later= SLOWER
(Semantic interference)

19
Q

Evidence for simple model (Levanthal et al., 1999) suggests

A

Meaning is processed earlier than sounds

20
Q

Types of speech errors

A

Exchange, preservation, addition, subtraction, blend, deletion

21
Q

Speech error at semantic level

A

May occur when semantic unit is activated e.g ‘Blonde eyes’ instead of blonde hair

22
Q

Speech error at phonological level

A

A wrong phoneme is activated e.g hats and dogs instead of cats and dogs

23
Q

Criticism of sequential model (simple model) of speech

A

What about phonetic and semantic word errors e.g. Virtue of chastity rather than charity

24
Q

Parallel models of speech

A

Stages are simultaneous and not sequential

25
Q

Support for parallel models

A

Lexical bias effect- people more likely to make phoneme errors that end up in actual words than non-words

26
Q

Dell et al (1986) interactive model of speech production

A

4 layers=

  1. Semantic
  2. Syntactic
  3. Morphological and phonological
  4. Selected word
27
Q

Levelt et al (1999) criticism of parallel models/speech error evidence

A

Internal error monitor can explain speech errors, so do we really need a model?

28
Q

Speech production in the brain. Which area is most associated?

A

Broca’s area

29
Q

Indefery and Levelt (2004) how long for speech production

A

600ms in total

30
Q

A meta-analysis of 82 studies found which areas involved in speech production?

A

PET and FMRI majority

- superior, medial parietal lobe, right anterior, medial frontal lobe, anterior temporal lobes

31
Q

Motor theory of speech production argues

A

Motor representations are the primary unit of speech production

32
Q

Lieberman (1950) on speech motor system:

A

Involved in perception of speech and listening is a motor act

33
Q

Wilson et al (2004) FMRI study- motor theory

A

Listening to speech activated bilaterally a superior portion of the ventral pre motor cortex- largely overlapped Brodmann’s area 4a and 6

34
Q

Limitation of Wilson et al (2004) FMRI study (motor theory)

A

Scott et al (2009): no control group

35
Q

Pulvermuller et al (2006) motor theory finding

A

Overlap between areas involved in speech perception and speech production is articulatory-specific

36
Q

Meister et al (2007)TMS on pre motor cortex

A

% correct ID’s impaired due to disruption of human premotor cortex

37
Q

Yuen et al (2010) EPG & heard match/mismatching the syllable & distractor congruent/incongruent

A

Found subtle change in producing syllable (mismatching)

Incongruent distractors= greater alveolar contact vs congruent

38
Q

Scott et al (2009) critique of role of motor cortex in speech production

A

Neurological data show no correlation between speech categorisation
Speech production and perception dissociate in development
Motor cortex can be linked to speech in other ways e.g. Time taking essential in joint speech