Learning To Read Flashcards

1
Q

When was reading invented?

A

200 years ago

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How long does it take to learn how to read?

A

10 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the writing systems?

A

Alphabetic, syllabic and logographic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Examples of alphabetic writing systems

A

English, Cyrillic and Hebrew

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Examples of syllabic writing systems

A

Consonants and Vowels represented by characters e.g Thai and Burmese

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Logographic writing systems

A

Symbols represent whole words/ parts of words e.g. Chinese and Japanese

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Orthographic depth is

A

How the brain solves the problem of reading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Deep orthographic depth

A

A lot of exceptionality in the relationship between letters and sounds e.g. English

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Shallow orthographic depth

A

Exactly one phoneme for every grapheme e.g. Cyrillic alphabet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Middle orthographic depth

A

One phoneme for every grapheme but some exceptions e.g. Placement of stress in Italian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How much percentage of English can neural network learn

A

80%, rest are exceptions (20%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Seymour et al (2003) study in Scotland details

A
  • children at end of year 1
  • European, Scottish High SES and low SES
  • shallow and deep orthography
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Seymour et al (2003) findings

A

Shallow words better and quicker reaction time for shallow and high SES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Limitation with Seymour et al (2003) Scotland and EU children study

A

Scots aged 4-5 in year 1. European children go to school later so may be better because older

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Spencer and Hanley (2004) Welsh and English speaking study details

A

29 Welsh speaking and 22 English speaking reception age
Tested 3x in November, March and June
Read 30 common words, half irregular spellings e.g of, have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Spencer and Hanley (2004) findings

A

Welsh at term 2= 40% vs 3% English

End of 1st year- 15% English, 60% Welsh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Strengths of Spencer and Hanley (2004) Welsh study

A

Children start school at same age and no difference in SES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

PISA test

A

Done every 2 years
Test at age 15
20% 15 year olds in EU lack functional literacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Implications of PISA test findings (20% 15 y.olds)

A

More likely unemployed be less likely to vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Methods of reading instruction

A

Phonics based approaches and whole word approaches

21
Q

What is the phonics-based approach of learning to read?

A

Learn systematic correspondences between letters and sounds

Simple words presented over and over

22
Q

Limitations of whole word approach

A

Spoken language is innate, not reading and children need to know relationship between letters and sounds

23
Q

Review against whole word approach

A

NRP (2000) phonics produce significant benefits from kindergarten -> year 6

24
Q

Strengths of phonics

A

NRP report, 2006- implemented as law from Rose Review (800+ responses)
10 min a day intervention groups
Phonics screen- keep increasing (58% 2012 now 77% 2015)

25
Q

Becoming a skilled reader

A

Learning alphabetic principle is critical for reading success

26
Q

Alphabetic principle

A

Orthography-> phonology -> semantics

27
Q

Which meta-analysis showed two pathways in the brain for reading?

A

Taylor, Rastle and Davis (2012)

28
Q

What two pathways did Taylor, Rastle and Davis (2012) find for reading?

A

Dorsal ( print-> sound) and ventral ( print-> meaning)

29
Q

Visual word form area (Dehaene et al, 2003) BOLD response shows

A

Neurones subserving object perception in left mid-fusiform gyrus will become more specialised for recognising written words as we develop greater skill

30
Q

Stanford longitudinal study (Ben-Schachar et al, 2011) details

A

53 children, 7-12 years FU 4 years

Annual assessments and brain scans

31
Q

Findings of Stanford longitudinal study (Ben-Scharchar et al, 2011)

A

Children reach cluster volume in area in VOT at about age 15

32
Q

What else did Stanford longitudinal study find

A

Words embedded in noise. Older= more sensitive as they are more experienced readers

33
Q

Developmental dyslexia DSM-4 diagnosis

A
  • reading achievement substantially below persons age, intelligence and age-appropriate education
  • disturbance significantly interferes with academic achievement or activities that require reading skills
34
Q

Limitations of DSM-4 diagnosis of developmental dyslexia

A

Criteria not specific to someone with dyslexia-loose language

35
Q

How is dyslexia measured

A

Non-standardised tests of word and non-word reading, text reading and comprehension, spelling

36
Q

Cut of for impairment (dyslexia) varies

A
1 SD (16% population)
2 SD (3% population)
37
Q

Problems with assessment of dyslexia

A

Doesn’t tell us what dyslexia is or how it arises- problematic

38
Q

ROSE review (2009) dyslexia definition

A

Learning difficulty that primary affects skills involved in accurate and fluent word reading + spelling

39
Q

Rose review (2009) findings

A

Difficulties in phonological awareness, verbal memory and verbal processing speech

40
Q

What is a good indication of severity and persistence of dyslexia

A

Examining how well they respond to well-founded intervention

41
Q

Phonological deficit hypothesis

A

Specific deficit in the phonological language domain (verbal STM, non-word repetition, tasks requiring phonological skills, reading and spelling)

42
Q

When are the phonological difficulties notably revealed

A

Non-word reading performance e.g (gabe, Vib, slint)

43
Q

Rack et al (1992) tests appreciation between letters and sounds

A

Not an equal distribution: must have significant problems reading non-words

44
Q

Plaut et al (1996) where do dyslexics lack mapping?

A

Orthography-> phonology

45
Q

Challenge by Castles and Coltheart (1993) to phonological deficit hypothesis

A

Subset of developmental dyslexics that don’t have difficulty reading non words and therefore no phonological deficit

46
Q

Manis et al (1996) reply to castle and Coltheart (1993) criticism

A

If subset exists, it’s rare and seem to have reading DELAY rather than disorder

47
Q

Most recent meta- analysis regarding dyslexia

A

Melby- Lervag et al (2012): 235 studies, youngest child= 5.

48
Q

Dyslexia debate (Elliot et al)

A
  • no accepted way of diagnosis
  • ambiguity in use of term
  • interventions effect for everyone
  • term doesn’t give us anything- children need help with severe problems and aren’t diagnosed (need extra information, not just label)