Specific Audit Areas Flashcards
Confirmation procedures applicable to assets (e.g., accounts receivable) fundamentally address which assertion associated with account balances at the end of the period?
Existence.
Audit Procedures Generally Applicable to the Four Assertions for Account Balances
Existence—Related to the validity of recorded items.
Completeness—Related to omissions of amounts that should have been recorded.
Rights and Obligations—Related to any restrictions to the entity’s rights to their assets or to the obligations for their liabilities.
Valuation and Allocation—Related to the appropriateness of dollar measurements.
Existence—Related to the validity of recorded items.
- Confirmation—(Especially when concerned about overstatements.) For example, cash, accounts receivable, inventory held by others, and investments held by others.
- Observation—Especially for inventory or investment securities held by the entity.
- Agree (vouch) to underlying documents—Agree items from the accounting records to the supporting source documents to evaluate the appropriateness of recorded items
Completeness—Related to omissions of amounts that should have been recorded.
- Cutoff tests—Trace from supporting source documents back to the accounting records looking for omissions. For example, trace from shipping documents to cost of goods sold or to the sales journal, or perform a “search for unrecorded liabilities.”
- Analytical procedures—These are applicable to every audit area, but be specific: calculate a particular ratio or compare something specific to another specific thing!
Rights and Obligations—Related to any restrictions to the entity’s rights to their assets or to the obligations for their liabilities.
- Inquire of applicable client personnel—Inquire about compensating balances with banks, the use of specific assets as collateral for debts, review debt agreements for collateral, etc.; the management representation letter should document these inquiries regarding important matters.
- Examine authorization of transactions—to ascertain whether any unusual conditions apply.
Valuation and Allocation—Related to the appropriateness of dollar measurements.
- Recalculate account balances—(Verify the client’s calculations), for example, for depreciation expense and prepaid insurance.
- Trace to subsequent cash receipts or disbursements—Includes tracing to cash receipts or cash disbursements journal and to the bank statement.
- Analytical procedures—review the aged trial balance for accounts receivable to evaluate the apparent reasonableness of the allowance for uncollectibles. (In connection with such analytical procedures, the auditor may also inspect underlying sales invoices or shipping documents to test the accuracy of the entity’s data underlying the analytical procedures.)
- Examine published price quotations for fair value measurements, when applicable
Which of the following would be a consideration in planning a sample for a test of subsequent cash receipts?
Preliminary judgments about materiality levels.
In planning the sample, the auditor must determine how many and how much, i.e., how many cash receipts and what dollar cut-off. Both are affected by materiality levels.
On receiving a client’s bank cut-off statement, an auditor most likely would trace
Prior-year checks listed in the cut-off statement to the year-end outstanding checklist as a means of verifying the completeness and accuracy of the outstanding check list.
Which of the following procedures would an auditor most likely perform in auditing the statement of cash flows?
Reconcile the amounts included in the statement of cash flows to the other financial statements’ amounts.
Reconcile the amounts included in the statement of cash flows to the other financial statements’ amounts.
The primary purpose of sending a standard confirmation request to financial institutions with which the client has done business during the year is to
Corroborate information regarding deposit and loan balances.
The usefulness of the standard bank confirmation request may be limited because the bank employee who completes the form may
A standard bank confirmation request, particularly the standard bank confirmation request for loan guarantee information, must be completed by an individual who is knowledgeable about the financial relationships and transactions that the bank has with the client. Otherwise, the usefulness of the confirmation is limited.
Which of the following characteristics most likely would be indicative of check kiting?
Check kiting occurs when cash is fraudulently created through the transfer of money between banks. Insufficient funds checks are written and deposited among a series of banks and the float is used to “create” cash.
Kiting would be evidenced by a low average balance compared to a high level of deposits because, although deposits are being made, checks are immediately written to remove the funds, resulting in a low average balance.
Review the Client’s Bank Reconciliation for Each Cash Account
- Request a cutoff bank statement approximately 10 days after year-end, to test the reconciling items on the year-end bank reconciliation. Deposits in transit have been deposited and outstanding checks match checks processed on cut-off statements.
- Confirm directly with the bank the balance according to the bank statement (for any cash or liabilities)
During a recent audit of the revenue cycle, a CPA found the client had $1 million in accounts receivable recorded for fictitious customers. Which of the following tests most likely facilitated identification of the fraud?
Sending positive confirmations to all of the client’s customers with balances on December 31
A nonresponse indicates a situation that should be followed up by the auditor.
An auditor is required to confirm accounts receivable if the accounts receivable balances are
Material to the financial statements.
Two assertions for which confirmation of accounts receivable balances provides primary evidence are
Rights and obligations and existence.
Confirmations of accounts receivable balances provide primary evidence for rights and obligations and existence. Direct responses from third parties provide proof that the accounts receivable are valid (that they exist) and that the amounts are properly owed to the entity.
Which of the following most likely would be detected by an auditor’s review of a client’s sales cut-off?
Unrecorded sales at year-end
An auditor’s review of sales cut-off would reveal unrecorded sales at year-end as well as subsequent-year sales that were improperly included in the current year.
The negative form of confirmation can only be used when four conditions are met
(1) the risk of material misstatement (i.e., the combined assessed level of inherent and control risk) is low
(2) a large number of small balances is involved
(3) a very low exception rate is expected
(4) the auditor has no reason to believe that the recipients of the requests are unlikely to give them consideration.
In confirming accounts receivable, an auditor decided to confirm the customer’s account balances rather than individual invoices. Which of the following most likely would be included with the client’s confirmation?
A client-prepared statement of account showing the details of the customer’s account balance.
Which of the following procedures would an auditor most likely perform to identify unusual sales transactions?
Performing a trend analysis of quarterly sales
Accounts Receivable
- Related to the Existence/Occurrence Assertion- Verify that the subsidiary A/R ledger agrees or reconciles with the A/R general ledger balance. Confirm customer accounts (positive and negative confirmations),
- Related to the Valuation Assertion—Evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimates of allowance for uncollectibles and the allowance for sales returns.
- Related to the Completeness Assertion-Perform a cutoff test of sales. Examine the shipping documents for the last few shipments before year-end and the first few shipments after year-end; compare these shipping documents with the related sales invoices to assess whether the sales were recorded in the appropriate period. Proper cutoff involves two assertions (existence/occurrence and completeness)
- Related to the Rights and Obligations Assertion—Inquire of management: receivables pledged as collateral
If no response is received to a positive confirmation request, the auditor should send a second confirmation request, and perform alternate procedures if still no response is received.
- Subsequent cash receipts (the preferred alternate procedure)
- Vouch to (inspect) the underlying documents (the last resort if the account has not been collected)
Lapping
Attempt to cover up a theft of receipts, where a clerk might try to apply a later receipt to the prior customer’s account (and so on) until the scam ends by writing off someone’s account as uncollectible (associated with an improper segregation of duties)
The client asked the auditor to audit financial statements covering the current year. The auditor did not observe at the prior year’s physical inventory. Which of the following actions would the auditor most likely take?
Audit the prior year inventory using alternative substantive procedures.
Which of the following procedures would be most appropriate for testing the completeness assertion as it applies to inventory?
Performing cut-off procedures for shipping and receiving.
The completeness assertion pertains to transactions that have not been recorded or are missing. Performing cut-off procedures for shipping and receiving enables the auditor to detect late transactions that may not have been recorded in the proper period and may be missing from the current (audit) year.
Which of the following is necessary if the auditor plans to observe inventories at interim dates?
Perpetual inventory records are maintained.
If inventory is to be observed at an interim date, perpetual inventory records must be maintained. Such records will provide the book balances against which the physical count can be compared.
Which of the following auditing procedures most likely would provide assurance about a manufacturing entity’s inventory valuation?
Testing the entity’s computation of standard overhead rates
Gaining assurance about the valuation of inventory requires, among other things, determining that inventories have been properly priced at the lower of cost or market. The determination of cost is obtained by reviewing current production costs, which might include testing the entity’s computation of standard overhead rates.
An auditor most likely would make inquiries of production and sales personnel concerning possible obsolete or slow-moving inventory to support management’s financial statement assertion of
Valuation or allocation.
A senior auditor conducted a dual-purpose test on a client’s invoice to determine whether the invoice was approved and to ascertain the amount and other terms of the invoice. Which of the following lists two tests that the auditor performed?
Tests of controls and tests of details
A “dual-purpose” test involves gathering evidence in part to evaluate the effectiveness of internal control and in part to evaluate the fairness of the financial statements. “Tests of controls” address the internal control part of the dual-purpose test; and the inspection of underlying accounting documents constitutes a test of details, which addresses the substantive part of the dual-purpose test.
Inventory
- Related to the Existence Assertion- The client counts the entire inventory and the auditor observes the client’s taking of the inventory (while taking independent test counts ). The auditor participates in this process for two primary reasons, referred to as dual purpose tests.
- Related to the Valuation Assertion- price tests based on underlying invoices for merchandise or job order cost records in manufacturing
- Related to the Completeness Assertion- Test inventory cutoff and analytical procedures (Compare the current year to the prior year and inquire about any significant differences)
- Related to the Rights and Obligations Assertion- Inquire of management about any inventory that might be held on consignment or pledged as collateral
Dual purpose tests
- Internal control objectives—The auditor should study the client’s written procedures and instructions given to the employees or others counting the inventory to assess the adequacy of the design of these procedures
- Substantive audit objectives—The auditor should take a sample of inventory items and verify the physical existence of quantities reflected in the client’s detailed records supporting the ending inventory
To test existence for inventory
The auditor should select items from the client’s (final) inventory listing, which is essentially the subsidiary ledger for the adjusted general ledger balance. The auditor should agree those selected items to the underlying inventory count tags (and the auditor’s own count sheets) that serve as source documents.
To test completeness for inventory
The auditor should select items from the underlying inventory count tags (including the auditor’s own count sheets) and agree those to the client’s inventory listing to establish that there were no omissions from the client’s inventory listing.
How should an auditor verify the valuation of marketable securities at the balance sheet date?
Compare the prices of the securities to published closing prices at the balance sheet date.
In establishing the existence and ownership of long-term investments in the form of publicly traded stock, an auditor most likely would inspect the securities or
Confirm the number of shares owned that are held by an independent custodian.
To satisfy the valuation assertion when auditing an investment accounted for by the equity method, an auditor most likely would
Examine the audited financial statements of the investee company.
A client has a large and active investment portfolio that is kept in a bank safe deposit box. If the auditor is unable to count the securities at the balance sheet date, the auditor most likely will
Request the client to have the bank seal the safe deposit box until the auditor can count the securities at a subsequent date.
Investments in Securities and Derivative Instruments
The standard states that the auditor’s objective is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the valuation of investments in securities and derivative instruments. Determine fair value based on active market. If no active market, gain understanding of valuation model used.
Investments in Securities When Valuations Are Based on Cost
The usual auditing procedures may include inspection of documentation of the purchase price, confirmation with outside parties, and testing the amortization of any discount or premium.
Investments in Securities When Valuations Are Based on the Investee’s Financial Results
Reading the Audited Financial Statements of the Investee May Provide Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence
Summary of Procedures with Emphasis on Four Balance-Sheet-Related Assertions for Investments:
- Related to the Existence Assertion—The auditor mainly uses inspection and confirmation.Physically inspect any securities in the possession of the client entity. Confirm any stocks and bonds held by an independent custodian.
- Related to the Completeness Assertion—The auditor primarily uses analytical procedures to address the risk of omissions.
- Related to the Valuation Assertion- verify interest, carrying value and dividends
- Related to the Valuation Assertion
An auditor’s principal objective in analyzing repairs and maintenance expense accounts is to
Discover expenditures that were expensed, but should have been capitalized.
Which of the following procedures would an auditor most likely complete to test the existence assertion of property, plant and equipment?
Obtaining a listing of all current-year additions, vouching significant additions to original invoices, and determining that they have been placed in service.
Agreeing the recorded additions of fixed assets to the underlying invoices and verifying that the assets have actually been placed in service (perhaps by inspecting the assets) establishes that the recorded assets are properly recorded, which is the essence of the existence assertion.
When auditing prepaid insurance, an auditor discovers that the original insurance policy on plant equipment is not available for inspection.
The policy’s absence most likely indicates the possibility of a(n)
Lien on the plant equipment.
Which of the following explanations most likely would satisfy an auditor who questions management about significant debits to accumulated depreciation accounts in the current year?
Plant assets were retired during the current year.
The retirement of plant assets would result in a debit to accumulated depreciation, along with a credit to the plant assets account for the acquisition cost.
In performing a search for unrecorded retirements of fixed assets, an auditor most likely would
Inspecting the property ledger and the insurance and tax records would allow the auditor to identify old assets likely to have been retired. Touring the client’s facilities would then allow the auditor to determine whether the assets are still present.
Fixed Assets
- Related to the Existence Assertion- For Additions—Vouch to (inspect) the underlying documents. For Disposals—Trace any proceeds received to the cash receipts journal and bank statement; review for appropriate approval.
- Valuation Assertion- depreciation expense and impairements
- Completeness Assertion- repairs and maintenance properly expensed or capitalized
- Rights and Obligations Assertion
Inquire of management about any fixed assets pledged as security
Which of the following procedures would an auditor most likely perform in searching for unrecorded payables?
Compare cash payments occurring after the balance sheet date with the accounts payable trial balance.
An auditor’s purpose in reviewing the renewal of a note payable shortly after the balance sheet date most likely is to obtain evidence concerning management’s assertions about
Presentation and disclosure.
A note payable that is renewed after the balance sheet date would be examined by the auditor in order to ensure that it was properly presented at the balance sheet date and that related disclosures were adequate. This would provide the auditor with evidence for the presentation and disclosure assertions.
In auditing accounts payable, an auditor’s procedures most likely would focus primarily on management’s assertion of
Completeness.
In auditing accounts payable, the auditor is more concerned that the balance may be understated. As a result, the primary assertion of interest is completeness.
Current Liabilities
- Completeness Assertion- Perform a search for unrecorded liabilities. This is done toward the end of fieldwork. Review cash disbursements subsequent to year-end and, for all disbursements over some specified dollar amount (>$X), examine the related vendors’ invoices and the entity’s related receiving documents to identify transactions that should have been reported as liabilities as of year-end
- Existence and Valuation Assertions- Vouch selected items to the underlying vendor’s invoices. Usually valuation is not an audit issue.
- Rights and obligations assertion-Inspect the specific terms of the payables and inquire about any related party transactions
The tickmark € is consistently used with respect to payments.
Tracing those payments to the cash disbursements journal and then to the relevant bank statement is a relevant audit procedure to gather evidence as to the validity of identified payments of this debt.
An auditor’s program to examine long-term debt most likely would include steps that require
Correlating interest expense recorded for the period with outstanding debt.
The tickmark ¥ is consistently used with respect to 20X1 “expense.”
Calculating the interest expense (presumably using the effective interest method) is a relevant audit procedure to gather evidence as to the reasonableness of such recorded expense.