Audit Reporting Flashcards
For an entity’s financial statements to be presented fairly in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the principles selected should
1) be prepared in accordance with the identified financial reporting framework;
2) be appropriate in the circumstances;
3) provide information about matters that may affect the use, understanding, and interpretation of the financial statements;
4) classify and summarize information in a reasonable manner; and
5) reflect transactions in a manner that presents the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows stated within a range of reasonable and practicable limits.
GAAS require the auditor’s report to contain either an expression of opinion regarding the financial statements or an assertion to the effect that an opinion cannot be expressed.
The objective of this requirement is to prevent
Misinterpretations regarding the degree of responsibility the auditor is assuming.
When financial statements contain a departure from GAAP because, due to unusual circumstances, the statements would otherwise be misleading, the auditor should explain the unusual circumstances in a separate paragraph and express an opinion that is
Unmodified.
When strict adherence to GAAP would result in misleading financial statements, the auditor may issue an unmodified opinion accompanied by an emphasis-of-matter paragraph describing the GAAP departure.
If an auditor is satisfied that there is only a remote likelihood of a loss resulting from the resolution of a matter involving an uncertainty, the auditor should express a(n)
Unmodified opinion.
If there is only a remote likelihood of a loss resulting from an uncertainty, GAAP does not require adjustment or disclosure. The auditor should express an unmodified opinion.
When issuing an unmodified opinion, the auditor who evaluates the audit findings should be satisfied that the
Estimate of the total likely misstatement is less than a material amount.
In order to issue an unmodified opinion, the auditor must be confident that no material misstatements exist in the financial statements. While misstatements may exist, in total they must be believed to be less than a material amount.
Clarified Standards—Under the AICPA’s Clarified Standards, the auditor’s unmodified report has been reformatted and expanded to reflect four main sections:
- The first section ordinarily has no label, and merely identifies the nature of the engagement and the entity’s financial statements involved (consisting of one sentence).
- Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements (one sentence)—States that management is responsible for the fair presentation of the financial statements and the design and implementation of internal control.
- Auditor’s Responsibility, which consists of three separate paragraphs.
- The fourth section is labeled Opinion (one sentence)—Expresses the auditor’s opinion (in the same wording as that used in the previous AICPA standards).
Signature Block—The AICPA now requires identification of the CPA’s city/state, in addition to the signature and date.
Auditor’s Responsibility, which consists of three separate paragraphs.
- The first consists of three sentences—(1) responsibility to express an opinion; (2) conducted the audit in accordance with (GAAS); and (3) plan and perform the audit to provide reasonable assurance.
- The second consists of five sentences—(1) perform procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures; (2) the procedures depend on the auditor’s judgment, including assessment of risks of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; (3) in making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control; (4) auditor expresses no such opinion (on internal control, when not engaged to report on internal control in an integrated audit); and (5) an audit includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates.
- The third consists of one sentence—Expressing the auditor’s belief that the audit evidence is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for the opinion.
Alternative Audit Reports
- emphasis-of-matter paragraph.
- other-matter paragraph.
- Qualified Opinion—The auditor expresses one or more reservations about (1) the financial statement presentation (owing to a material departure from the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework); or (2) the audit engagement (owing to a scope limitation about a material matter for which the auditor was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence).
- Adverse Opinion—The auditor states that the financial statements are not fairly stated (as a result of a departure from the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework that is material and pervasive).
- Disclaimer of Opinion—A report in which the auditor expresses no conclusion about the fairness of the entity’s financial statements (due to a scope limitation that is material and pervasive).
Form AP, which must be filed with the PCAOB for every audit of an issuer, addresses each of the following matters
- The extent of participation of any other accounting firm whose participation in the audit accounts for 5% or more of the total audit hours involved with the engagement.
- The name of the engagement partner.
- The number and extent in total of all other accounting firms whose participation in the audit accounts for less than 5% of the total audit hours involved with the engagement.
- PCAOB auditing standards require that such a statement regarding the auditor’s tenure be expressed somewhere within the audit report, not in Form AP.
Which of the following statements is correct about the auditor’s report under PCAOB auditing standards?
- The auditor’s opinion is expressed at the beginning of the audit report.
- The auditor’s report to be dated at the point at which the auditor obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence as a basis for the opinion
- Each section of the audit report must have an appropriate label. (a) Opinion on the Financial Statements; (b) Basis for Opinion; and (c) Critical Audit Matters
- Critical audit matters must be identified and discussed in the auditor’s report.
- The report must state the year when the auditor first began serving consecutively as the company’s auditor
Under PCAOB auditing standards, every audit report must include a section on critical audit matters, except for
A disclaimer of opinion due to a scope limitation that is material and pervasive.
A disclaimer of opinion due to a scope limitation that is material and pervasive.
Critical audit matters (CAMs)
Any matter arising from the audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment
In the group auditor’s report, the group engagement partner decides not to make reference to a component auditor who audited a client’s subsidiary. The group auditor could justify this decision if, among other requirements, the group engagement partner
The group engagement partner can elect to take full responsibility for the financial statements, so long as satisfaction with the independence, and professional reputation, and competence of the component auditor is obtained and the additional requirements for assuming responsibility have been met.
The group engagement partner decides not to refer to the audit of a component auditor who audited a subsidiary of the group auditor’s client. After making inquiries about the component auditor’s professional reputation and independence, the group engagement partner most likely would
Contact the component auditor and review the audit programs and documentation pertaining to the subsidiary.
When the group engagement partner decides not to accept responsibility for the work performed by a component auditor, the group engagement partner must disclose this fact in the audit report.
Which of the following procedures would the group auditor most likely perform after deciding to make reference to a component auditor who audited a subsidiary of the reporting entity?
When part of the audit is performed by a component auditor, the group auditor is required to make inquiries concerning the professional reputation, independence, and competence of the component auditor.
AICPA Professional Standards, specifically Terms of Engagement (AU-C 210.A26), identify five considerations that may influence the decision to obtain a separate engagement letter when the auditor audits the parent nonissuer and the component:
(1) who engages the component auditor;
(2) whether a separate auditor’s report is to be issued on the component;
(3) legal requirements regarding the appointment of the auditor;
(4) the degree of ownership by the parent; and
(5) the degree of independence of the component management from the parent entity.
Green, CPA, concludes that there is substantial doubt about JKL Co.’s ability to continue as a going concern.
If JKL’s financial statements adequately disclose its financial difficulties, Green’s auditor’s report should
- Include a separate paragraph following the opinion -paragraph
- Specifically use the words “going concern”
- Specifically use the words “substantial doubt”
Emphasis-of-Matter Paragraph
A paragraph that refers to a matter appropriately presented or disclosed in the financial statements that, in the auditor’s judgment, is of such importance that it is fundamental to users’ understanding of the financial statements.
Other-Matter Paragraph
A paragraph that refers to a matter other than those presented or disclosed in the financial statements that, in the auditor’s judgment, is relevant to users’ understanding of the audit, the auditor’s responsibilities, or the auditor’s report.
Matters for which an emphasis-of-matter paragraph is required:
- When the auditor has substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern
- When there is an inconsistency in accounting principles used
- When the financial statements are prepared in accordance with special purpose frameworks
Circumstances for which an auditor may consider it necessary to add an emphasis-of-matter paragraph
(1) an uncertainty as to the outcome of unusually important litigation or regulator action;
(2) a major casualty having a significant effect;
(3) significant transactions with related parties; or
(4) unusually important subsequent events.
Circumstances for which an Auditor May Consider it Necessary to Add an Other-Matter Paragraph:
- Relevant to users’ understanding of the audit—In rare situations, the auditor may add an other-matter paragraph to explain why it was not possible for the auditor to withdraw from an engagement in which a scope limitation that was pervasive resulted in a disclaimer of opinion.
- Relevant to users’ understanding of the auditor’s responsibilities or the auditor’s report—For example, when the opinion expressed on the prior year’s financial statements is different than the opinion previously expressed
An auditor was unable to obtain audited financial statements or other evidence supporting an entity’s investment in a foreign subsidiary.
Between which of the following opinions should the entity’s auditor choose?
Qualified and disclaimer.
The auditor’s inability to obtain audited financial statements or other evidence supporting an entity’s investment in a foreign subsidiary represents a scope limitation. Either a qualified opinion or a disclaimer would be issued.
In which of the following circumstances would an auditor usually choose between issuing a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion?
Inability to obtain sufficient appropriate evidential matter (scope limitation or GAAP departure)
An auditor most likely would modify the audit report if the entity’s financial statements include a footnote on related party transactions
Stating that a particular related party transaction occurred on terms equivalent to those that would have prevailed in an arm’s-length transaction.
Material related party transactions must be disclosed.
In general, it is not possible to determine whether or not such transactions were conducted on terms equivalent to those in an arm’s-length transaction. If the entity’s financial statements include a footnote on related party transactions that states that a particular related party transaction occurred on terms equivalent to those that would have prevailed in an arm’s-length transaction, should obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to verify arm’s-length equivalence. If such evidence were not available, the auditor would ask management to remove the unsupportable statement. If the entity refused to remove the footnote in question, the auditor would consider issuing a qualified or adverse opinion, due to GAAP departure.
The standard states that the auditor’s objective is to express clearly an appropriately modified opinion when
(1) the auditor concludes that the financial statements as a whole are misstated; or
(2) the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement.
Modified opinion:
A qualified opinion, an adverse opinion, or a disclaimer of opinion.
Opinion Scope Limitation Involves Judgment
- Qualified Opinion— auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, and the auditor concludes that the possible effect on the financial statements, if any, could be material, but not pervasive.
- Disclaimer of Opinion— auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, and the auditor concludes that the possible effect on the financial statements, if any, could be material and pervasive.
Circumstances Resulting in a Scope Limitation
- entity’s accounting records have been destroyed.
- auditor determines that substantive procedures alone are not sufficient and the entity’s controls are ineffective; the auditor is unable to obtain audited financial statements of an investee
- the timing of the auditor’s appointment does not permit the auditor to observe the physical counting of inventories.
- Limitations Imposed by Management
Effect of a Qualification for a Scope Limitation on the Auditor’s Report
- No effect on the introductory paragraph or management’s responsibility section.
- Auditor’s responsibility section—Modify the last sentence to state, “We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified audit opinion.”
- Add a “Basis for Qualified Opinion” paragraph
- Qualify the opinion using appropriate language such as: “In our opinion, except for the possible effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph
Zag Co. issues financial statements that present financial position and results of operations but Zag omits the related statement of cash flows. Zag would like to engage Brown, CPA, to audit its financial statements without the statement of cash flows although Brown’s access to all of the information underlying the basic financial statements will not be limited. Under these circumstances, Brown most likely would
Explain to Zag that the omission requires a qualification of the auditor’s opinion.
When an entity omits a statement of cash flows, the auditor may accept an engagement to audit the other financial statements, but should qualify the opinion, since a statement of cash flows is required when general-purpose financial statements present financial position and results of operation.
Opinion Choice for a Misstatement (Including Inadequate Disclosure) Involves Judgment
- Qualified Opinion— auditor concludes that misstatements are material, but not pervasive to the financial statements.
- Adverse Opinion— auditor concludes that misstatements are material, and pervasive to the financial statements.
Effect of a Qualification for a Misstatement on the Auditor’s Report:
Same as for Scope limitation except:
Add a “Basis for Qualified Opinion” paragraph (with such a label) before the opinion paragraph which MUST should include a description and quantification of the financial effects of the misstatement; likewise, the auditor should include the omitted information (when practicable).
Tread Corp. accounts for the effect of a material accounting change prospectively when the inclusion of the cumulative effect of the change is required in the current year.
The auditor would choose between expressing a(n)
Adverse opinion and a qualified opinion.
Accounting for the effect of a material accounting change prospectively, when GAAP require inclusion of the cumulative effect of the change in the current year, is a GAAP departure. A material GAAP departure results in either an adverse or a qualified opinion.
Effect of an Adverse Opinion on the Auditor’s Report
- No effect on the introductory paragraph or management’s responsibility section.
- Auditor’s responsibility section—modify the last sentence to state, “We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our adverse audit opinion.”
- Add a “Basis for Adverse Opinion” paragraph with same requirements as qualification of misstatement
- Express the adverse opinion using appropriate language such as: “In our opinion, because of the significance of the matter discussed in the Basis for Adverse Opinion paragraph, the financial statements referred to above do not present fairly
Under which of the following circumstances would a disclaimer of opinion not be appropriate?
The financial statements fail to contain adequate disclosure concerning related party transactions.
A disclaimer is issued when the scope limitations pertaining to the audit are so pervasive that the auditor in unable to express an opinion. Lack of adequate disclosures in the financial statements is a GAAP departure, not a scope limitation. Thus, a disclaimer of opinion would not be appropriate.
Effect of a Disclaimer of Opinion on the Auditor’s Report
- Minor effect on the introductory paragraph (“We were engaged to audit …”) and no effect on the management’s responsibility section.
- Auditor’s responsibility section—Revise this section to consist of the following two sentences: “Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on conducting the audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Because of the matter described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion paragraph, however, we were not able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion.”
- Add a “Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion” paragraph
- Disclaim an opinion using appropriate language such as: “Because of the significance of the matter described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion paragraph, we have not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on these financial statements.”
When there has been a change in accounting principles, but the effect of the change on the comparability of the financial statements is not material, the auditor should
Not refer to the change in the auditor’s report.
Only material matters are relevant to the auditor’s report.
When there has been a change in accounting principle that materially affects the comparability of the comparative financial statements presented and the auditor concurs with the change, the auditor should
Refer to the change in an emphasis-of-matter paragraph
If a change in accounting principle has occurred and the auditor concurs with the change, the only requirement that must be met is to refer to the change in an emphasis-of-matter paragraph following an otherwise unmodified opinion.
In the first audit of a new client, an auditor was able to extend auditing procedures to gather sufficient evidence about consistency.
Not refer to consistency in the auditor’s report.
GAAS require that the auditor identify occasions in which the accounting principles have not been applied consistently. No mention is to be made in the report if the consistency requirement is met. If the auditor was able to obtain sufficient evidence about consistency, the auditor’s report should not refer to consistency.
Consistency of Financial Statements. The standard states that the auditor’s objectives are to
(1) evaluate the consistency of the financial statements for the periods presented; and
(2) communicate appropriately in the auditor’s report when comparability has been materially affected by:
(a) change in accounting principle or (b) adjustments to correct a material misstatement in previously issued financial statements.
When the Auditor’s Opinion Covers Two (or More) Periods
The auditor should evaluate the consistency between such periods, as well as the consistency of the earliest period covered by the auditor’s opinion with the prior period.
The auditor should evaluate a change in accounting principles about four matters:
- in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework
- method of accounting for the effect of the change is in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework
- disclosures about the change are adequate
- Whether the entity has justified that the alternative adopted is preferable
When the financial statements are restated to correct a prior material misstatement
The auditor should include an emphasis-of-matter paragraph in the auditor’s report. (That paragraph need not be included in subsequent periods.) The auditor should state that the auditor’s opinion is not modified regarding the matter.
A change from an accounting principle that is not in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework to one that is in accordance is a correction of a misstatement.
If the financial statement disclosures relating to the restatement are not adequate
The auditor should evaluate the inadequacy of disclosure and consider whether the auditor’s report should be modified.