SPE- Frustration aggression hypothesis Flashcards

1
Q

What is a social psychological explanation ?

A

Any theory that argues aggression is the result of an interaction between an indivdual’s characteristics and features of the situations in which behaviour occurs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Frustration-aggression hypothesis ?

A

Social psychological theory that argues that anger, hostility and violence are always the outcome when we are prevented from achieving our goals (frustration)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who formulated the hypothesis ?

A

John Dollard and his colleagues (1939)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the hypothesis state ?

A

Frustration always leads to aggression and aggression is always the result of frustration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is aggression seen as ?

A

A psychological drive akin to biological drives such as hunger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When do we experience frustration and consequences?

A

When our attempts to reach a goal are blocked by some external factors.This creates an aggressive drive , leading to aggressive thoughts and behaviour such as verbal outbusts or physical violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Catharsis ?

A

A negative emotion which is removed when there is an aggressive drive (psychodynamic approach)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How is aggressive behaviour cathartic ?

A

Aggression created by frustration is satisfied, therefore reducing the drive and making further aggression less likely.
We feel better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 reasons that the FA hypothesis recognises that aggression is not always expressed directly against the source :

A

1.Cause of frustration may be abstract, eg economic situation,government
2.Cause may be too powerful and we risk punishment by aggressing against it
3.Cause may be unavailable at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What happens when our aggression is not directed at the source ?

A

Aggression is deflected or displaced onto an alternative - one that is not abstract, weaker and is available.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Research sone by Leonard Berkowitz (1989) :

A

Frustration merely creates a readinesss for aggression.But the presence of aggressive cues in the environment make acting upon this more likely. Therefore, cues are an additional element of the FA Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Berkowitz lab study demonstratin the weapon effect :

A

-Ppts were given fake electric shocks by a confederate, creating anger and frustration.
-Ppts later had the oppurtunity to give fake shocks to confederate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Results of research on ‘weapon effect’ :

A

Number of shocks was greater when there were 2 guns on the table compared to other conditions where there were no guns.
6.07 v 4.67

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does the weapon effect show ?

A

It supports Berkowitz contention that the presence of aggressive environmental cues stimulates aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How many pieces of research are done in this sub topic ?

A

2
Weapon affect
-Investigate how frustration affects aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Research on frustration aggression :

A

Russell Green (1968) carried out a study to investigate how frustration affects aggression

17
Q

Procedure of Frustration aggression

A

-University students completed a jigsaw puzzle. Their level of frustration was experimentally manipulated in 1 of 3 ways.
- All the ppt later had an opportunity to give the confederate electric shocks

18
Q

How was the level of frustration experimentally manipulated ?

A
  • Some ppt puzzle was impossible to solve.
    -Others -> they ran out of time because another student (confederate) in the room kept interefering.
    -3rd group : confederate insulted the ppt who failed to solve the puzzle
19
Q

Findings of research :

A

1.The insulted ppt gave the strongest shocks on average
2.Then the interfered group
3.Then the impossible task ppt.
All 3 groups selected more intense shocks than a control group