sources of law (lec 2) Flashcards
what is reasoning? What is it also known as?
judges must explain how they came to a decision
ratio decidendi
3 things judges need to produce as reasoning
- written constitution
- reference to legislative statutes
- reference to prior judicial decisions
-known as PRECEDENTS
-aka principle of stare decisis
legal reasoning
understood as reasoning by example
What is obiter dicta? Does it have value in precedent?
comments on law or policy that do not directly impact the decision on the case; does not have precedential value.
role of judges in legal reasoning
-see if current case resembles a plain case sufficiently+ is relevant
-use precedent and new ideas
-stare decisis; consideration NOT rule, judges must be critical and re-evaluate it
-understand changing society+reflect that in decisions
common law
-judge made law
-uses the past to guide present day behaviors
what is the value of common law? (3 things)
-consistency/certainty; (laws of today need to be valid tomorrow)
-predictability b/w present and future
-guarantees rule of law; (justice applied equally and impartially)
what are statutes, what do they do?
laws made by legislative bodies
set framework of a regulation
difference b/w common law and statutes
statutes don’t use precedent
-complex precedent of common –> clear, codified statues
-easier for common ppl to understand
-therefore democracy improved
what led to statues
mistrust of elites
-1892 criminal code replaced common law criminal offenses
-hope: take away more influence from judges so stare decisis wouldn’t be needed
how do statutes take away more power from judges
-more constraint than common law
-can’t challenge parliament
-codified crimes: all judges need is to apply the law, less interpretation needed
-judges can’t make law (but still make decisions)
why was stare decisis still present even after criminal code was established?
-its impossible to create statues that encompass every future situation
-difference between what’s written and the reality in which they’re should be applied
does international law impact domestic law?
Yes. It still impacts domestic law even if it’s outside jurisdiction
40% of federal statues come from international rules
How/why does international law impact domestic law?
-international agencies; binding rules, our laws must match the organization’s (ex. WHO, UN, UNESCO)
-treaties, laws must match treaty
-dispute b/w countries; resolution is to amend/change or add laws
What is the process of creating treaties? Are states forced? What has to be taken into consideration when implementing?
-states VOLUNTARILY create treaties
-after creation, implementation of new laws/changes
-federal gov. responsible for policy + formation
-treaties which require legislation changes must go thru parliament
-constitution sets terms of federal+provincial powers, so it must be considered when making treaties