sources of law (lec 2) Flashcards

1
Q

what is reasoning? What is it also known as?

A

judges must explain how they came to a decision

ratio decidendi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 things judges need to produce as reasoning

A
  1. written constitution
  2. reference to legislative statutes
  3. reference to prior judicial decisions

-known as PRECEDENTS
-aka principle of stare decisis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

legal reasoning

A

understood as reasoning by example

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is obiter dicta? Does it have value in precedent?

A

comments on law or policy that do not directly impact the decision on the case; does not have precedential value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

role of judges in legal reasoning

A

-see if current case resembles a plain case sufficiently+ is relevant

-use precedent and new ideas

-stare decisis; consideration NOT rule, judges must be critical and re-evaluate it

-understand changing society+reflect that in decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

common law

A

-judge made law

-uses the past to guide present day behaviors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the value of common law? (3 things)

A

-consistency/certainty; (laws of today need to be valid tomorrow)

-predictability b/w present and future

-guarantees rule of law; (justice applied equally and impartially)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are statutes, what do they do?

A

laws made by legislative bodies

set framework of a regulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

difference b/w common law and statutes

A

statutes don’t use precedent

-complex precedent of common –> clear, codified statues
-easier for common ppl to understand
-therefore democracy improved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what led to statues

A

mistrust of elites

-1892 criminal code replaced common law criminal offenses

-hope: take away more influence from judges so stare decisis wouldn’t be needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how do statutes take away more power from judges

A

-more constraint than common law

-can’t challenge parliament

-codified crimes: all judges need is to apply the law, less interpretation needed

-judges can’t make law (but still make decisions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

why was stare decisis still present even after criminal code was established?

A

-its impossible to create statues that encompass every future situation

-difference between what’s written and the reality in which they’re should be applied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

does international law impact domestic law?

A

Yes. It still impacts domestic law even if it’s outside jurisdiction

40% of federal statues come from international rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How/why does international law impact domestic law?

A

-international agencies; binding rules, our laws must match the organization’s (ex. WHO, UN, UNESCO)

-treaties, laws must match treaty

-dispute b/w countries; resolution is to amend/change or add laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the process of creating treaties? Are states forced? What has to be taken into consideration when implementing?

A

-states VOLUNTARILY create treaties

-after creation, implementation of new laws/changes

-federal gov. responsible for policy + formation

-treaties which require legislation changes must go thru parliament

-constitution sets terms of federal+provincial powers, so it must be considered when making treaties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Canada is a federation, what does this mean?

A

-provinces joined Canada VOLUNTARILY, at different times

-each province had its own conditions, such as the building of a railroad, or wiping debt

17
Q

What is Canada’s approach to international law?

A

Dualism

18
Q

What is dualism with respect to international law?

A

In Canada’s legal system, it is understood that international and domestic law operate in separate spheres

19
Q

Where does the influence of Canada’s response to international law and treaties come from?

A

Britain, from the colonization of north America

20
Q

What is the goal of dualism? How does the system adopt domestic law from international? Are we forced to adopt international law?

A

-protect society from unwanted intrusion of international laws

-system CHOOSES what parts they want to adopt as domestic law. Done by creating our own statutes

21
Q

where is an example another place law can be “seen”

A

Museum

22
Q

how is a museum somewhere where law can be “seen”?

A

-reflects political community

-built on legacies of colonialism+imperialism

-present idea of ‘the people’ which enables ‘the people’ to be governable in a way

-evolution from primative –> civilized life

-helps create citizenry (shared experience)

-more negatively- can do poor job of representing groups/ppl or even erasing them altogether

23
Q

What are rules of equity?

A

solutions to address the rigidity and unfairness of
the common law rules

24
Q

What is subordinate legislation? What does it deal with?

A

bodies to whom legislatures gave some of their law-making authority

deals with trivial details of statutes

25
Q

What did the The Quebec Act (1774) mean for Quebec’s private law?

A

kept private law rooted in the French tradition