Sources of Law Flashcards

1
Q

Define Law.

A

The system of rules which a particular country or community recognises as regulating the actions of its members, and which it may enforce by the imposition of penalties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the functions of law?

A
  • maintains peace and safety in society
  • regulates the relationships between persons and/or entities
  • it protects human rights and liberties
  • it ensures the smooth running of economic and political activities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the stages of legal development?

A

○ PRE-1066 (Norman conquest) - the locally-based systems and customs of the Anglo- Saxon society.
○ 1066-1485 (Tudor accession) - the formation of common law and its imposition over and above local systems and customs
○ 1485-1832 - the development of equity
○ 1832 to the present day - modern period:
> The fusion of common law and equity
> Massive development in statute law
> Growth of governmental and administrative bodies
>The influence of the European union

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is equity?

A

a branch of law that developed alongside common law and is concerned with fairness and justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the monarch as the source of justice.

A
  • today’s legal system has its origins in the King’s (and Queen’s) Courts
  • following the Norman Conquest and the imposition of the new feudal system, it became possible to dispense centralised justice, with the King as the central body.
  • Initially, the King exercised only ‘High Justice’, that is, his personal power, in a very limited number of disputes. Generally, this was in cases where the monarch was personally affected, and where the usual localised form of justice would not work.
  • As such the King’s Court, was available only to the highest-ranking persons in the country. This, together with the limited jurisdiction of the King’s Courts, meant that they were able to co-exist with local courts.
  • the King was aided in the administration of justice by a group of semi-professional skilled clerics who were part of the royal entourage. These clerics eventually took on the function of deciding disputes themselves.
  • They became autonomous (able to decide themselves) from the King and established themselves at Westminster. The establishment of a fixed King’s Court was required by the Magna Carta in 1215. The King’s Council gradually developed and different ‘branches’ of the court evolved to deal with different types of dispute.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Curia Regis (italics)

A

King’s council

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is jurisdiction?

A

the official power to make legal decisions and judgements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a centralised justice system?

A

where one party has the authoritative power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 3 courts that developed from the Kings’ Council? And what did they deal with?

A

1) Court of Exchequer, dealing with royal finances. 2) Court of Common Pleas, dealing with the owner possession of land.
3) Later, the Court of King’s Bench emerged, dealing with serious criminal matters. These courts remained until the Judicature Act 1873.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the assize courts? What did they have jurisdiction over? And how long did they continue for?

A

To make provision for the administration of law outside London, royal justices were despatched to the provinces with a royal commission to hold ‘assizes’ (or sittings) of the royal courts.

  • Initially the Assize Courts had jurisdiction only over criminal matters, but this was later extended to civil matters.
  • Assize Courts continued until the enactment of the Courts Act 1971.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did the common law start?

A

With time, the King’s Courts became essential to the resolution of disputes between citizens. The law which the King’s judges applied was based upon the common customs of the country, hence the term ‘common’ law. The kings court was firmly in place and recognised as supreme over the local courts by the time of the reign of Edward I (1272).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the different meanings of common law?

e.g. in a historical sense, in the Kings court, case law, commonwealth

A
  • In the historical sense, to distinguish the law as applied by the King’s judges as opposed to the law as applied by the local customary court
  • To distinguish the law as applied by the King’s Courts as opposed to the rules of Equity, a system developed by the separate Court of Chancery;
  • To distinguish case law – that is, law as developed by judges through the system of precedent – from statute law;
  • To identify the law as applied by common law countries (such as Commonwealth jurisdictions to which the English legal system was exported) as opposed to the law as applied by civil law countries where the law is based on Roman law (as applied, for instance, in most of mainland Europe).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the writ system?

A
  • The common law which was developed by the King’s Courts was a procedural system. There was no automatic right of access to the King’s Courts. In fact no such right existed until 1875.
  • To be able to pursue a claim, the intending claimant had to purchase a writ from the Chancellor before an action could be brought before the courts.
  • The writ also contained the foundation of the complaint and a different form of writ was used for each ground of complaint (or ‘forms of action’). The writ system soon became rigid. The forms of these writs became fixed, and only Parliament could allow a new writ to be issued. If a claimant could not find an existing writ to cover his case, he had no claim which the court would try.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a writ?

A

A writ was a document with a royal seal that constituted a royal demand for the defendant to appear before the Court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was a real action?

A
  • A real action was an action in the common law courts for the recovery of land. The earliest form of real action was the writ of right. This was a direction from the King commanding the feudal lord to try a dispute about title to freehold land in the feudal lord’s local courts. The action would be resolved in a trial by battle, with the opposing parties engaged in physical battle.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was personal action?

A

In contrast to real actions, a personal action was an action for which the remedy was damages, i.e. financial compensation.

17
Q

What were the earliest personal actions at common law?

A

Debt, Detinue, Covenant & Account

18
Q

What is debt?

A

an action for a fixed sum of money in return for an executed consideration (signed undertaking).

19
Q

What is detinue?

A

a claim for the return of a specific personal possession wrongfully retained (with the option of damages in lieu). Debt and detinue were triable by ‘wager of law’, that is, by persons testifying to the character of the defendant as proof that the claim was not well-founded.

20
Q

What is covenant?

A
  • a legally binding promise
  • an action for damages resulting from breach of a man’s promise under seal (by deed). No consideration was necessary. The concept of the covenant remains of significance in the law today.
21
Q

What is an account?

A
  • this used to compel a party to account to the claimant for money received on the claimant’s behalf, e.g. a bailiff who received rent on behalf of the claimant
22
Q

What does trespass mean and what can it be committed against?

A
  • Trespass means unlawful interference. Trespass remains a modern cause of action (reason for starting legal proceedings).
  • Trespass can be committed against :
    1) The person
    2) Goods
    3) Land
23
Q

What were the problems with common law’s writs and procedures?

A
  • The forms of action and the writ system provide one example of how the common law system became hidebound by complex and restrictive procedures. For each writ there was a corresponding fixed procedure, which laid down the steps that had to be followed. Selection of the wrong writ or failure to follow the correct procedure would be fatal to an action. The problem, in essence, was that the common law did not concern itself with the determination of an individual’s rights and duties.
  • Instead, procedure was paramount. The reason for this was that the common law developed purely as a means by which a dispute could be resolved. The courts came into existence with the aim to conclude disputes rather than necessarily to resolve them in a just way. It was never a system that was developed based on any concept of ‘rights’ and ‘wrongs’.
  • Another problem with the common law was that, in personal actions, it offered only the remedy of damages. For example, where one breached a covenant (a legally binding promise), the aggrieved party would not be able to compel the breaching party to fulfil the promise.
24
Q

What are the current sources of law applicable in England and Wales?

A

○ Case law -The body of law made by judges deciding cases in court. Also referred to as ‘common law’.
○ Legislation -Law passed by Parliament in the form of statutes.
○ Law originating in the European Union -Before Brexit, some EU law was applicable in the United Kingdom without any action on the part of Parliament. After Brexit, some law which was originally part of EU law remains applicable in the UK via legislation passed by Parliament.
○International law -The United Kingdom has ratified numerous international treaties and conventions. Many are not ‘law’ in the strict sense, i.e. breach does not attract a penalty, but they are still a source of legal rights and obligations.