Equity Flashcards
How did equity come about?
- Because of the problems posed by the common law, aggrieved litigants who felt that justice was not served in the King’s Courts began to petition the King to do justice in particular instances.
- By the end of the 13th century, such petitions were dealt with by way of a formal procedure by the Court of Chancery, presided over by the Lord Chancellor.
What was the origin of the law of trusts?
- When landowners went abroad, they needed someone to look after their lands, to perform feudal duties and collect rents in their absence. The custom arose whereby a landowner would transfer the legal title to his estate to a trusted friend on the basis that it would be used for the benefit of the departed landowner and his family. Instances arose of the recipient of an estate ignoring the terms and instead attempting to exercise his status as legal owner for his own benefit.
- The common law courts refused to recognise the rights of the original landowner and his family on the grounds that, by having no legal title, they had no locus standi (standing or interest) in the King’s Courts. However, the Chancellor intervened in equity on the ground that it would be unconscionable for the recipient of the estate to ignore the terms of the transfer. The recipient would thus be compelled to hold the land for the use and benefit of the original landowner and his family.
What is equity of redemption?
flexible approach which allowed redemption by repayment even after the due date had passed
Which should prevail - equity or common law?
equity
Why was a two system court difficult/ caused problems? What solution was proposed to fix it?
If both an equitable remedy (such as an injunction) and damages were required, two actions would have to be brought: one at common law and one in Chancery. - causing a duplication of legal proceedings
- As a partial resolution to the problem, the Common Law Procedure Act 1854 gave common law courts some power to grant equitable remedies. The Chancery Amendment Act 1858 gave the Court of Chancery power to award damages in lieu of an equitable remedy.
What was important about the Judicature Acts 1873-1875?
These Acts abolished the old division of the three common law courts and the Court of Chancery, and instead created a single High Court and Court of Appeal which could apply equally the rules and remedies of both common law and equity. In cases of conflict, equity still prevails.
Which type of remedy is discretionary and which type of damages are available as of right?
equitable remedies are still discretionary, whilst common law damages are available as of right
What are the maxims of equity?
The principles of equity aka the equitable maxims
- consolidated in the 17th and 18th centuries
- guided the courts in deciding cases and remain applicable
Name examples of equitable maxims.
· Equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy.
· Equity follows the law.
· One who seeks equity must do equity.
· One who comes into equity must come with clean hands.
· Delay defeats equities.
What is the main legal remedy in English law?
Award of damages - financial compensation
When are equitable remedies appropriate?
Equitable remedies are awarded only if damages would not be an adequate remedy.
What is the equitable doctrine of ‘laches’?
The equitable doctrine of ‘laches’ is that delay in pursuing an equitable claim or remedy may prevent the claimant obtaining relief. This is based on the maxim that delay defeats equities.
What are the main equitable remedies?
- Specific performance.
- Injunctive relief.
- Declaratory relief.
- Rescission.
- Rectification.
What is the specific performance remedy?
Specific performance is an order by the court to compel a party to perform something they have promised to do under a contractual agreement. It is an equitable remedy available for breach of contract. Specific performance is a discretionary remedy and is not available as of right for every breach of contract.
Where is specific performance available?
where:
ü There is a valid and enforceable contract.
ü Damages would not be an adequate remedy for the claimant.