Sources of law Flashcards

1
Q

What is the role of judges in developing the law?

A

Judges develop the law by applying established legal principles to new situations. They establish principles, known as ‘ratio’, that can be applied to other cases. They also make ‘obiter dicta’ or incidental remarks, which may or may not be significant depending on the facts of the case and the seniority of the tribunal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the purpose of royal assent in the legislative process?

A

Royal assent is the formal approval by the Monarch that an Act of Parliament receives before becoming law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is secondary legislation and how is it created?

A

Secondary legislation, also known as ‘subordinate’ legislation, is law created by ministers or other bodies under powers given to them by a parent Act of Parliament. It is used to fill in the details of primary legislation and provides practical measures for enforcing and operating the law in daily life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do the rules of precedent affect lower courts?

A

The rules of precedent mean that, in general, lower courts are bound to apply the judgments of the senior courts. This ensures consistency and uniformity in the application of the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does it mean for a court to follow a decision?

A

When a court considers the facts of a case to be so similar to those in an earlier case that the law in the earlier case should be followed, it can be said to be following the decision in that case. If the court doing the ‘following’ is a higher court, then the later decision is also said to be approving the earlier one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are public Acts of Parliament and how are they debated?

A

Public Acts of Parliament relate to matters of general public concern and are debated in both Houses of Parliament. Any outside body wishing its views to be considered can only do so by persuading an MP or peer to put forward such views in debate. This practice is known as lobbying.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the relationship between equity and common law after the fusion of the common law courts and the Court of Chancery?

A

Despite the formal fusion of the common law courts and the Court of Chancery in the 1870s, the conceptual distinction between common law (legal) rights and equitable (or beneficial) rights remains crucial to the law overall. Equitable remedies are still discretionary in nature, while common law damages are available as of right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How can a court avoid following a binding precedent?

A

A court may avoid following an otherwise binding precedent if it feels able to ‘distinguish’ the earlier case, by finding a difference in the material facts between the two cases. Finding a fact on which to distinguish an unhelpful or unpopular precedent is part of a judge’s skillset.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the difference between public Acts and private Acts of Parliament?

A

Public Acts of Parliament relate to matters of general public concern, while private Acts of Parliament relate to particular places or particular people. Private Acts usually stem from proposals by large organizations such as local authorities or large private companies seeking specific powers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What happens when a judgment is reversed or a precedent is overruled?

A

A judgment is reversed if a case goes to appeal and the higher appeal court disagrees with the lower court. This does not negate a precedent; it simply means the higher court has not applied the law in the same way. A precedent is overruled if a superior court in a later case decides the original precedent set in a past case is wrong and sets a new ‘correct’ precedent instead. The original precedent is no longer good law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the difference between a Government Bill and a Private Members’ Bill?

A

A Government Bill represents the policy of the government of the day and is drafted by the official parliamentary draftsman based on what the government department promoting the Bill wants to bring into law. A Private Members’ Bill is a bill promoted by a particular Member of Parliament, normally through the Ballot system. These Bills do not start life as official government policy but can sometimes be supported by the government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the potential problem with a system based on precedent?

A

One of the potential problems inherent in a system based on precedent is ossification of the law. This refers to the risk of the law becoming rigid and inflexible due to strict adherence to precedent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the stages involved in the legislative process of a Bill?

A

The stages involved in the legislative process of a Bill include the first reading, second reading, committee stage, report stage, and third reading. If passed, the Bill goes on to the other House for further consideration and ultimately requires royal assent to become an Act of Parliament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How can the highest appeal court depart from its own precedent?

A

If today’s highest appeal court (the Supreme Court) wishes to depart from its own precedent in order to modernize or correct the law, it can do so by issuing a Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent). This was formally recognized as being possible in 1966 by the former Appellate Committee of the House of Lords.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a declaration in the legal context?

A

A declaration is a legally binding statement by a court about the legal rights of the parties, the existence of facts, or a principle of law. Courts can make a binding declaration whether or not any other remedy is claimed, although a claim for a declaration alone is unusual.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the doctrine of stare decisis?

A

Stare decisis is a doctrine employed in the English legal system, which means ‘stand by what has been decided’. Once a point of law has been decided by any superior court, it establishes a precedent. Future cases with the same material facts must be decided in the same way. This is different from civil legal systems, where courts focus on interpreting detailed written codes of law rather than interpreting previous decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What exceptions allow the Court of Appeal to depart from precedent?

A

The Court of Appeal (CA) generally intends to maintain its own precedents, but there are three exceptions: 1) If the CA came to previously conflicting decisions, it can select the one to follow. 2) If the CA’s own previous decision has been overruled expressly or impliedly by the Supreme Court or House of Lords, it need not be followed. 3) If the CA’s previous decision was made per incuriam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the structure of Acts of Parliament?

A

All Acts of Parliament begin with the short title, date, and long title of the Act. They are then divided into parts, which contain different sections. Sections are further broken down into subsections. This structure helps organize the subject matter of the Act for ease of navigation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is rectification and when is it used?

A

Rectification is an equitable remedy that corrects a document to reflect the parties’ contractual intention. It is used to correct mistakes made in recording agreements and applies only in the case of written contracts. Rectification may be used to correct various types of mistakes in the way a transaction is recorded, but it is not available if the errors are too fundamental or extensive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What parts of a judgment are binding?

A

A judgment consists of a summary of the facts, statements of law (including ratio decidendi and obiter dicta), and the court’s decision on remedy. The ratio decidendi, meaning ‘reason for the decision’, is the part that is binding on other courts. It is the legal principle or rule on which the court’s decision is based and applied to the material facts of the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are the rules of precedent for different courts?

A

The rules of precedent can be summarized as follows: Supreme Court - Binding on all inferior courts and itself (subject to 1966 Practice Statement). Court of Appeal - Binding on all inferior courts and itself (subject to Young v BA exceptions). High Court - Binding on all inferior courts and itself (unless there is a powerful reason to depart). Upper Tribunal - Binding on the First Tier Tribunal, inferior courts, and itself. First Tier Tribunal - Not binding but may be persuasive. Family Court, Crown Court, County Court, Magistrates Court - Not binding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the role of Parliament in scrutinizing secondary legislation?

A

Parliament can either approve or reject a statutory instrument (SI) but cannot amend it. The Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments checks SIs to ensure the law they contain is clear and follows the powers given by the parent Act. The extent of parliamentary scrutiny and the procedures vary depending on the parent Act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the rules of statutory interpretation?

A

Statutory interpretation is the process of determining what Parliament intended when it enacted a piece of legislation. While there were traditionally seen to be certain rules of statutory interpretation, contemporary judges take a holistic approach and consider both the ordinary meaning of words and the underlying purpose of legislation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is case law and its function as a source of law in England and Wales?

A

Case law refers to the decisions of courts and tribunals and serves as a source of law in England and Wales. It is a body of law developed by judges through the system of precedent, where earlier decisions are binding on later cases with similar facts. Case law helps interpret and apply statutes and fills gaps in legislation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is the purpose of linguistic presumptions in statutory interpretation?

A

Sometimes judges need to apply linguistic presumptions to aid their interpretation of the meaning of statutory language. These presumptions help guide judges in understanding the intended meaning of words in a statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is the role of the courts in examining delegated legislation?

A

While the courts have no power to invalidate an Act of Parliament, they are empowered to examine whether delegated legislation is made within the powers of the parent Act. If delegated legislation is found to be outside the powers granted by Parliament, the courts can quash it. This ensures that delegated legislation is made within the scope of the parent Act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is the literal rule of statutory interpretation?

A

The literal rule is the simplest traditional rule of statutory interpretation. It means that the words used in a statute are to be given their ordinary, plain, and natural meaning, assisted by extrinsic aids if necessary. The courts do not need to consider what Parliament might have meant.

28
Q

What is the golden rule of statutory interpretation?

A

The golden rule was developed to avoid the unnatural and absurd outcomes that can result from an overly literal application of the literal rule. It allows the court to depart from the ordinary meaning of words if applying them in their ordinary signification would produce inconsistency, absurdity, or inconvenience. The court can put on them some other signification that the court thinks the words will bear.

29
Q

What is the mischief rule of statutory interpretation?

A

The mischief rule examines the original purpose of the provision under consideration. It requires the court to consider what the common law was before the making of the Act, what the mischief or defect was for which the common law did not provide, what remedy for the mischief Parliament intended to provide, and what the true reason was for adopting that remedy. However, the mischief rule is now defunct and has been subsumed into the purposive approach.

30
Q

What is the purpose of Section 3(1) of the UK Human Rights Act?

A

Section 3(1) of the UK Human Rights Act states that the courts should interpret UK domestic legislation in a way that is compatible with European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) rights, as far as it is possible to do so.

31
Q

What is the difference between binding and persuasive precedents?

A

A precedent may be binding, in which case it must be followed by the court, or persuasive, in which case it will be considered by the court and may be followed. Binding precedents are those set by superior courts and must be followed by lower courts. Persuasive precedents are those from other jurisdictions or lower courts and are not binding but can be influential in subsequent cases.

32
Q

What is the purposive approach to statutory interpretation?

A

The purposive approach is the most recent ‘rule’ of statutory interpretation. It reflects how modern judges approach their interpretive task. It involves considering the ordinary meaning of words in the context of the statute and then moving on to consider other possibilities where the ordinary meaning leads to an absurd result. The purposive approach is influenced by European legal culture and aims to seek compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights.

33
Q

What can a court do if it considers legislation to be incompatible with a Convention right?

A

If a court considers that legislation is incompatible with a Convention right, it may make a declaration of incompatibility to that effect, according to Section 4(2) of the UK Human Rights Act.

34
Q

What are some linguistic presumptions used in statutory interpretation?

A

Some linguistic presumptions used in statutory interpretation include expressio unius est exclusio alterius (the expression of one thing is to the exclusion of another), ejusdem generis (of the same kind), and noscitur a sociis (a word is known by its associates). These presumptions assist in interpreting the meaning and proper application of individual provisions in legislation.

35
Q

What is the requirement for public authorities under Section 6(1) of the UK Human Rights Act?

A

Under Section 6(1) of the UK Human Rights Act, public authorities, including courts and tribunals, are required to act in a way that is compatible with Convention rights.

36
Q

Is Parliament considered a public authority under the UK Human Rights Act?

A

No, Parliament is not considered a public authority for the purposes of the UK Human Rights Act.

37
Q

How does the expressio unius est exclusio alterius presumption work in statutory interpretation?

A

The expressio unius est exclusio alterius presumption means that the express mention of one thing excludes its extension to others. This presumption is used when there is a list of items with no general words that follow. The court presumes that only those items mentioned in the list are included in the statute.

38
Q

What is the ejusdem generis presumption in statutory interpretation?

A

The ejusdem generis presumption means ‘of the same kind’ or ‘genus’. It is used when a statute includes a generic but non-exhaustive list of items. The court looks at the specific words in the list and identifies their common characteristics. The general words that follow are then interpreted to include only words with those characteristics.

39
Q

How does the noscitur a sociis presumption assist in statutory interpretation?

A

The noscitur a sociis presumption states that a word is known by the company it keeps. It means that words of a statute are understood in the context of the statute itself, including any other parts of the statute. This presumption helps in interpreting the meaning of individual provisions by considering the associations and context within the statute.

40
Q

What is the difference between Regulations and Directives in EU law?

A

Regulations are directly applicable in the legal systems of the Member States, meaning they apply without the need for national legislation. Directives, on the other hand, are binding as to the result to be achieved but require Member States to pass national legislation to implement them. Member states are responsible for implementing the objectives of directives and individuals have legal means available to enforce rights provided by them.

41
Q

What actions can the European Commission take against Member States for breach of EU law?

A

The European Commission can start ‘infringement proceedings’ against Member States for breach of EU law. These proceedings are eventually determined by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

42
Q

What is the contemporary approach to statutory interpretation?

A

The contemporary approach combines the literal and purposive interpretations. Judges consider the ordinary meaning of words in the general context of the statute and then move on to consider other possibilities if the ordinary meaning leads to an absurd result. The purposive interpretation generally prevails where it provides a clear answer, but the strict meaning prevails if the court is uncomfortable with the result.

43
Q

What are the categories of rights under the ECHR?

A

Under the ECHR, rights can be divided into three categories: absolute rights, limited rights, and qualified rights. Absolute rights cannot be lawfully interfered with in any way by the state, limited rights can be lawfully interfered with in some circumstances, and qualified rights can be lawfully interfered with provided certain legal tests are met

44
Q

What additional powers of interpretation do courts have under the Human Rights Act 1998?

A

Under the Human Rights Act 1998, courts have additional powers of interpretation that allow them, where appropriate, to interpret legislation in a purposive way to seek compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights. This expands the scope of the purposive approach in statutory interpretation.

45
Q

What are the circumstances that must apply for the state to interfere legitimately with a qualified Convention right?

A

For the state to interfere legitimately with a qualified Convention right, it must be shown that: 1) the interference was prescribed by, or in accordance with, the law, 2) the interference was in pursuit of a legitimate aim, and 3) the interference was necessary in a democratic society.

46
Q

What is retained EU law and how does it relate to Brexit?

A

Retained EU law refers to the body of EU law that remains in force in the UK following Brexit. It includes the law that was introduced as a result of the UK’s membership of the EU/EEC since 1973. The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 repealed the European Communities Act 1972 and allowed for the replacement of retained EU law with new UK legislation.

47
Q

How did EU law become enforceable in domestic UK law?

A

EU law became enforceable in domestic UK law through the European Communities Act (ECA) 1972. Section 2(1) of the ECA ensured the direct applicability of EU law and made it a new source of UK law in its own right.

48
Q

What are the main categories of EU law?

A

The main categories of EU law are primary and secondary. Primary sources include the Treaty on the European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Secondary sources include Regulations, Directives, and Decisions made under Articles 288 and 289 of the TFEU. Case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is also considered a secondary source.

49
Q

What happens if a Member State fails to implement a Directive properly or on time?

A

If a Member State fails to implement a Directive properly or on time, legal proceedings known as ‘infringement proceedings’ may be started against that Member State by the European Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) eventually determines these proceedings.

50
Q

What is the role of the Human Rights Act 1998 in relation to the ECHR?

A

The Human Rights Act 1998 ensures that the rights in the ECHR are directly enforceable in the domestic courts of the UK. It serves as the conduit and enforcement mechanism for the ECHR as the principal source of rights protection in the UK.

51
Q

What is the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in enforcing directives?

A

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has developed various mechanisms to enable directives to be enforced in national courts. These mechanisms include direct effect, indirect effect, and state liability. Direct effect allows individuals to rely on directives in national courts if the implementation date has passed. Indirect effect requires domestic courts to interpret domestic law compatibly with EU law, where possible. State liability provides a form of compensation for a state’s failure to properly implement a directive.

52
Q

What is the significance of the Van Gend en Loos and Costa v ENEL cases in EU law?

A

The Van Gend en Loos and Costa v ENEL cases were important in establishing the principle of the supremacy of EU law over conflicting domestic law. These cases established that the European Economic Community (EEC)/European Union (EU) constituted a new legal order of international law, and that EU law has direct effect and can be relied upon by individuals in national courts.

53
Q

Relationship between equity and common law?

A

Equity and the common law are often complementary but, if there is conflict between the two, equity will prevail.

54
Q

Which one of the following statements is correct?

Once a form of secondary legislation has received parliamentary approval, it enjoys the same status and sanctity as primary legislation.

Parliamentary processes exist to allow MPs to scrutinise and to amend secondary legislation created by government departments.

A by-law is a form of secondary legislation which local authorities and some other associations use to create local rules and regulations, the authority to create which is initially approved by Parliament.

Statutory instruments are free-standing pieces of legislation that Parliament can pass to flesh out the substance of existing legislation.

There is a general consensus that the process of scrutiny, largely built around the practice of the affirmative procedure, allows Parliament to exercise an effective method of control over secondary legislation created by government.

A

A by-law is a form of secondary legislation which local authorities and some other associations use to create local rules and regulations, the authority to create which is initially approved by Parliament.

55
Q

Which one of the following statements is incorrect?

The second reading provides an opportunity for the relevant part of Parliament to discuss the amendments made to the bill by the other chamber.

A bill may only be introduced into the House of Commons.

The Committee stage of a bill takes place after the second reading.

The House of Lords’ powers are ultimately restricted to the review, proposed amendment and delay of legislation; an outright veto is not possible.

The first reading is a mere formality where the bill’s title is announced.

A

A bill may only be introduced into the House of Commons.

56
Q

Which one of the following statements is correct?

If a court considers that a statutory provision is prima facie incompatible with an ECHR right, it must make that provision compatible by reading in the necessary words to achieve this.

The only form of defendant that a claimant can take action against under the HRA is a central government department or a local authority.

The fact that courts are categorised as public authorities under the HRA has significantly aided the development of privacy law in the UK.

The concept of a public authority under the HRA brings within it courts and tribunals as well as Parliament itself, so all these bodies are obliged to act compatibly with ECHR rights.

Whenever a court considers that a provision in domestic legislation is incompatible with an ECHR right, it has a duty to alert the government to this by issuing a formal ‘declaration of incompatibility’.

A

The fact that courts are categorised as public authorities under the HRA has significantly aided the development of privacy law in the UK.

Correct. The courts’ interpretation of the HRA has led to the creation of a so-called indirect ‘horizontal effect’ through which the courts can assess disputes over alleged media infringement of individuals’ privacy.

57
Q

preliminary ruling?

A

A ruling by the Court of Justice on a question of law referred to it by a national court.

58
Q

Primary legislative process?

A

ills may start in either the Commons or the Lords (apart from Bills dealing with public finances, which must start in the Commons and cannot be defeated in the Lords).
* ‘First reading’ - a formality; the Bill’s title is read out, and a date set for a second reading.
* ‘Second reading’ - the main principles of the Bill are debated by MPs.
* ‘Committee stage’ - the detail of the Bill is scrutinised by a legislative committee. It may be amended.
* ‘Report stage’ - proposed amendments are debated, and there is a vote on the committee’s report.
* Third reading - final debate and vote on the Bill. If passed, it goes on to the other House.

59
Q

First reading?

A

This stage is purely formal: the title of the bill is read out and it is then printed and published.

60
Q

Second reading?

A

At this stage the main debate takes place in the House of Commons on the general principles of the bill.

61
Q

Committee Stage?

A

The bill is usually referred to a general (or public bill) committee, consisting of 16–50 members appointed by the Committee of Selection. There is proportional representation of parties on general committees (ie they reflect the division of the parties within the House).
Important bills (for example, bills of constitutional significance or concerned with authorising government expenditure) or bills that require little discussion because they are uncontroversial and unimportant may be referred to the ‘Committee of the Whole House’.
The purpose of the committee stage is to examine the bill in detail. Amendments may be made to its clauses.

62
Q

Third reading?

A

This stage involves the consideration of the bill as amended - normally the debate is brief and only verbal amendments may be made. This is the final opportunity to vote on the bill; often MPs do not.

63
Q

Proceedings in the House of Lords?

A

These do not begin until after the third reading in the Commons. The procedure in the Lords is similar to that outlined above, except that the Committee of the Whole House almost invariably takes the committee stage. When the bill has received its third reading in the Lords, it must be sent back to the Commons if the Lords have made any amendments. Theoretically, the bill can go backwards and forwards an indefinite number of times until the proceedings on it are terminated by prorogation. In practice, however, if the Commons disagrees with Lords’ amendments and restores the original wording, the Lords will usually accept it.

64
Q

Royal Assent?

A

Once Royal Assent is received, a bill becomes law and is referred to as an ‘Act of Parliament’. The Act may suspend its ‘commencement’ until some future date, which may be determined by delegated legislation made under the Act.

65
Q

Money bills?

A

‘Money bills’ (ie public bills certified by the Speaker as dealing only with national taxation or supply): A money bill passed by the Commons can be presented to the Monarch for assent one month after being sent to the Lords and will become law even though it lacks the consent of the Lords.