Sources and Principles of Canadian Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Common Law

A

It is an English invention
It is judge made law
It is developed through the common law courts
Judges give individual opinions and dissenting opinions are permitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Civil Law

A

It arises out of the Roman Law of Justinian Corpus Juris Civilis
Quebec is a civil jurisdiction
Based on established law and generally written as broad legal principles
Also includes doctrinal writing and interpretations written by learned scholars

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Grimard v The Queen [2009] FCA (Federal Court of Appeal) 47

A

The court held that both the common law and civil law are authoritative in Canada
When determining which law to look at, reference must be made to the concepts in force in the province at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reception of European Law in Canada

A

As soon as colonial land became the subject of settlement and commerce, all transactions in relation to it were governed by English law
Once a decision was made by either the Privy Council or the House of Lords on a common law principle, all common law jurisdictions, at least in the formative years, would accept the decision as binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a mixed law jurisdiction

A

It contains both common law and civil law
Canada is a mixed law jurisdiction
Also known as Bijuralism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What type of law does Quebec practice

A

Quebec’s legislative, judicial, and executive and administrative institutions and processes belong to English tradition, meanwhile many of their private laws are civilian based

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does stare decisis mean

A

It is a reliance on past cases
“Let the decision stand”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is precedent

A

A decision in a prior case that must be followed in like cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the current rules on precedent

A
  1. All Canadian courts, except the Supreme Court of Canada are bound to follow a precedent of the Supreme Court of Canada and any pre 1949 decision of the privy council that has not yet been overruled by the Supreme Court (a minority opinion of the Supreme Court is not binding)
  2. Provincial courts of appeal are not bound to follow a decision of the appellate court of another province
  3. Provincial courts of appeal will generally be bound by their own prior decisions
  4. Provincial courts lower than the highest appellate court are bound to follow a decision of the provinces appellate court
  5. Provincial courts at any level are not bound by the decision of the appellate courts of other provinces by decisions of the Federal Court of Appeal
  6. A decision of a court of coordinate jurisdiction are not biding, however, are highly persuasive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define Ratio Decidendi

A

“reason of deciding”
This i said to constitute the binding rule for purposes of precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define Obiter Dicta

A

Parts of the decision that are not binding (non-essential parts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the two points of view in which every case must be looked at

A
  1. that of the narrowest rule that a subsequent unkind court will concede that has been laid down
  2. the widest rule that a later friendly court could use to support a more novel position
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How can you overrule a precedent

A

There must be good grounds and those good grounds must be legally recognised
Legal principles may also help a judge depart from precedent (rule of law, legislative supremacy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are legal principles

A

Standards which must be respected for reasons of justice, fairness or morality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are presumptions

A

They resemble rebuttable rules that provide predetermined outcomes to disputes
They relax the burden of proof that would otherwise be imposed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Sullivan 2022 SCC 19

A

The court held that a declaration of invalidity by a superior court is not binding on superior courts of other provinces but are persuasive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

When does Horizontal stare decisis apply

A

It applies to courts of coordinate jurisdiction within a province and applied to a ruling of constitutionality of legislation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When should a judge disregard the decision of another judge of the same court

A

R v Sullivan 2022 SCC 19
1. When subsequence decisions have affected the validity of the impugned judgment
2. When it is demonstrated that some binding authority in case law or some relevant statute was not considered
3. When the judgement was considered a nisi prius judgement given in circumstances familiar to all trial judges, where the exigencies of the trial require an immediate decision without opportunity to fully consult authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the importance of Vavilov

A

The court held that there is a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness as the standard of review - used to balance legal principles against presumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the two categories of presumptions

A
  1. Presumptions with basic facts: require or permit inferences to be drawn upon the proof of certain facts
  2. Presumptions without basic facts: rules of substantive law in relation to the burden of proof-most judicially created presumptions are these
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are the different standards of review

A

Reasonableness and Correctness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the correctness standard of review used

A

On pure questions of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

When should findings of fact be reversed

A

They should not be reversed unless it can be established that the trial judge made a ‘palpable and overriding error’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the basic rule regarding the review of pure questions of law

A

An appellate court is free to replace the opinion of the trial judge with its own - the review is one of correctness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are the bases for deferring to the findings of fact of the trial judge

A
  1. Limiting the number, length and cost of appeals
  2. Promoting the autonomy and integrity of trial proceedings
  3. Recognising the expertise of the trial judge and his or her advantageous position
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is equity

A

The body of law developed by the Court of Chancery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What was the original function of Equity

A

To provide a corrective to the perceived harshness of the common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What were some matters falling within the jurisdiction of the Chancery Courts

A

Property, Contracts, procedure, Guardianship, Commercial matters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What are some equitable claims and remedies

A

Fiduciary duty, Trust, Undue influence, specific performance and Injunction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

KLB v British Columbia 2003 SCC 51

A

Notes four grounds for government liability in regards to foster care:
1. Direct negligence by the government
2. Vicarious liability of the government for tortious conduct of the foster parents
3. Breach of non-delegable duty of the government
4. Breach of fiduciary duty of the government (EQUITY)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is the basic principle of common law interpretation

A

A statutory rule will supersede a judge made rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is domestic law

A

Law that exists as legislation enacted by the legislature or made as regulations by the executive
Comes in the form of common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What is the difference between written and unwritten constitutional law

A

Written constitutional law: entrenched legislation - need special procedure to amend
Unwritten constitutional law: product of judicial decision making - also cannot be amended without special procedure

34
Q

What are two main sources of international law

A

Treaties and “customary international law”

35
Q

What are treaties

A

Law-making contracts between the states
Treaty between two states - bilateral
Treaty between a larger number of states - unilateral

36
Q

What are other names for treaties

A

Convention, covenant, protocol and agreement

37
Q

What is customary international law

A

Law that binds all states except those that have been sufficiently persistent in rejecting it prior to its emergence as a binding norm

38
Q

What are the five steps to the treaty-making process

A
  1. negotiations
  2. Signature
  3. Ratification
  4. Implementation
  5. Coming into force
39
Q

Who is responsible for negotiating international treaties on behalf of Canada

A

The Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act states that the Minister of Foreign Affairs is responsible for this

40
Q

Who can be involved in the negotiations in the treaty making process

A

Ministers, deputy ministers, diplomatic representatives or other negotiators

41
Q

What occurs once treaty negotiators have agreed on terms

A

The lead department working with Global Affairs Canada, requests Cabinet approval, submitting an explanatory memorandum to Cabinet setting out the details of the agreement

42
Q

What is involved in the ratification step of the treaty making process

A

Once a treaty is signed, a document is prepared establishing that the formalities for the coming into force and implementation of the treaty has been completed and Canada agrees to be bound by it
Ratification is wholly controlled by the executive branch

43
Q

When can Canada ratify an international treaty

A

Only when measures are in place to ensure that the terms of the treaty are enforceable in Canadian law

44
Q

What occurs when provincial or territorial legislation is implicated in the treaty making process

A

As a matter of policy, the executive branch does not ratify the treaty until all Canadian jurisdictions have indicated that they support ratification

45
Q

“Canada is a dualist jurisdiction” explain

A

This means that a treaty has no direct effect in domestic law until domestic legislation is passed to “transform” or “implement” it into Canadian law

46
Q

What is the dualist dilemma

A

The fact that there may be potential conflict between international law and domestic law

47
Q

What happens when a rule becomes recognised as customary law

A

It automatically becomes part of Canadian common law
Customary law can be displaced by statute

48
Q

Nevesum resources Ltd v Araya [2020] 1 SCR 166

A

The court held that customary international law is part of Canadian domestic law

49
Q

Define Comity

A

Comity means that when one state looks to another for help in criminal matters, it must respect the way in which the other state chooses to provide the assistance within its border

50
Q

Does the Canadian Charter apply extraterritorially

A

Section 32 of the Charter does not expressly impose any territorial limits on the application of the Charter, it falls upon the courts to determine this
The principle of sovereign equality is important here - respect for the sovereignty of foreign states

51
Q

What are the two main documents of Canada’s written constitution

A

The Constitution Act 1867 and the Constitution Act 1982

52
Q

What Canadian act encompasses the charter

A

Constitution Act 1982

53
Q

Two principle sources of unwritten constitutional norms recognised by the Supreme Court

A

Constitutional conventions and unwritten principles of the constitution

54
Q

Three ways in which Conventions come into existence

A
  1. A practice or agreement developed by political actors
  2. A recognition by political actors that they are bound to follow the convention
  3. The existence of a normative reason for the convention
55
Q

Main problem with the use of conventions

A

They are not considered law and as such cannot be enforced by the courts

56
Q

What is the main purpose of conventions

A

Resolution to Amend the Constitution [1981] 1 SCR 753
To ensure that the legal framework of the constitution will be operated in accordance with the prevailing constitutional values or principles of the period

57
Q

Four main unwritten principles of the constitution

A
  1. Federalism
  2. Democracy
  3. Constitutionalism and the rule of law
  4. Protection of minority rights
58
Q

Are unwritten principles legally binding

A

yes

59
Q

How did the court in Reference re Secession of Quebec [1998] 2 SCR 217, describe the unwritten principles of the constitution

A

Federalism: political and legal response to underlying social and political realities
Democracy: political system of majority rules (s 3 Charter guaranteeing the right to vote)
Constitutionalism and the rule of law: law is supreme over the acts of both government and private persons
Protection of Minorities: key considerations motivating the enactment

60
Q

What is the Rule of law

A

All exercises of legitimate public power must have a source in law and every state actor is subject to constrain of the law

61
Q

What are the two things the rule of law means according to the court in Re Manitoba Language Rights [1985] 1 SCR 721

A
  1. the law is supreme over officials of the government as well as private individuals and thereby preclusive of the influence of arbitrary power
  2. the rule of law requires the creation and maintenance of an actual order of positive law which preserves and embodies the more general principles of normative order
62
Q

What are the three principles of the rule of law according to the court in British Columbia v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd 2005 SCC 49

A
  1. The law is supreme over officials of the government as well as private individuals
  2. Requires the creation and maintenance of an actual order of positive law
  3. The relationship between the state and the individual shall be regulated by law
63
Q

What does Constitutional Supremacy mean

A

The constitution is the supreme law of the society and any ordinary law that is inconsistent with the constitution is of no force or effect
Constitutional law overrides ordinary law where the two conflict
Implies that the constitution cannot be amended in the same way as ordinary legislation is enacted

64
Q

What must be involved in the process for amending the constitution

A

A super-majority

65
Q

What does Parliamentary sovereignty mean

A

Subject to the constitution, the legislative branch of the state is the holder of all legitimate public power and may enact any ordinary statute law and (generally) delegate any of its power as it deems fit

66
Q

How has Canada transformed to a system of constitutional supremacy over parliamentary supremacy

A

The supreme court noted in Quebec Secession Reference that with the adoption of the Charter the Canadian government was transformed to a significant extent from a system of parliamentary supremacy to one of constitutional supremacy

67
Q

Babcock v Canada (AG) 2002 SCC 57

A

The court held that the unwritten principles must be balanced against the principle of parliamentary sovereignty

68
Q

Define the notion of Federalism

A

Parliamentary supremacy in Canada is subject to the division of law - making powers of jurisdiction between a national parliament and legislatures of the provinces, as set out in the constitution

69
Q

What are matters that are within federal jurisdiction

A

Criminal law in s 91(27)
Trade and commerce in s 91(2)
Banking in s 91(15)

70
Q

What are matters that are within provincial jurisdiction

A

Hospitals (other than marine hospitals) in s 92(7)
Municipalities in s 92(8)
The most important provincial jurisdiction is that over property and civil rights in s 92(13)

71
Q

What three institutional branches are public power exercised through and what are their functions

A

The legislature - the making of law
The executive - the implementing of law
The judiciary - interpreting and applying the law

72
Q

What are two principle purpose of the separation of powers

A
  1. A functional purpose of identifying the institutional homes of each of the three major forms of public power
  2. A normative purpose of providing general boundaries for the operation of each institution
73
Q

How does the executive branch derive its power

A

Solely from laws or statutes passed by the legislature
Therefore the executive branch is subordinate to the legislature

74
Q

How does the court in Ontario v Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario 2013 SCC 43 describe the roles of the three branches

A
  1. The legislative branch makes policy choices, adopts laws and holds the purse strings of government, as only it can authorise the spending of public funds
  2. The executive implements and administers those policy choices and laws with the assistance of a professional public service
  3. The judiciary maintains the rule of law by interpreting and applying these laws through the independent and impartial adjudication of reference and disputes, and protects the fundamental liberties and freedoms guaranteed under the charter
75
Q

What is the importance of judicial independence

A

The judicial branch of the state must have a sufficient degree of institutional independence from the legislative and executive branches of the state in order to perform its constitutional function

76
Q

What section of the Constitution Act 1867 contains provisions on the judicature

A

sections 96-101

77
Q

Two recognised ways in which constitutional evolution occurs in Canada

A
  1. Involves an approach to interpretation that permits the judiciary to read constitutional text in light of changes in society and contemporary uses of language
  2. Sometimes called the “living tree” approach - the text of the Constitution is not frozen in meaning
78
Q

What are the five different constitutional amending formulas

A
  1. Agreement of parliament and the legislatures of at least two-thirds of the provinces having at least 50 percent of the population of Canada (s 38)
  2. Unanimity of parliament and all provincial legislatures (s 41)
  3. Parliament and the legislatures of just those provinces affected by an amendment (s 43)
  4. Parliament alone, with respect to its own institutions (s 44)
  5. A provincial legislature alone, with respect to the provincial constitution (s 45)
79
Q

Describe s 96 of the Constitution Act 1867

A

It gives effect to the compromise reached at Confederation yb protecting the special status of the superior courts of general jurisdiction as the cornerstone of our unitary justice system

80
Q

Factors to consider when determining whether the legislature has created a prohibited parallel court with the superior court

A
  • the scope of the jurisdiction being granted
  • whether the grant is exclusive or concurrent
  • the monetary limits to which it is subject
  • Whether there are mechanisms for appealing decisions rendered in the exercise of the jurisdiction
  • The impact on the caseload of the superior court of general jurisdiction
  • Whether there is an important societal objective
    ( monetary value is not determinative only a relevant factor)
81
Q

What is the three step residential tenancies test

A

A test to determine whether a grant of jurisdiction is constitutionally infirm
1. Does the transferred jurisdiction conform to a jurisdiction that was dominated by superior, district or county courts at the time of Confederation
2. if so, was the jurisdiction in question exercised in the context of a judicial function
3. If the first two questions are answered in the affirmative, is the jurisdiction either subsidiary or ancillary to the administrative function or necessarily incidental to the achievement of a broader policy goal of the legislature

82
Q

What is the core jurisdiction test

A

When the core jurisdiction of the Superior Courts is affected, the court must ask whether the legislation has the effect of removing any of the attributes of the superior courts’ core jurisdiction
The core jurisdiction test prevents the legislature from transferring to other courts the features that are essential to the role of the superior courts as the centrepiece of the unitary justice system and the primary guardians of the rule of law