Sources and Principles of Canadian Law Flashcards
What is Common Law
It is an English invention
It is judge made law
It is developed through the common law courts
Judges give individual opinions and dissenting opinions are permitted
What is Civil Law
It arises out of the Roman Law of Justinian Corpus Juris Civilis
Quebec is a civil jurisdiction
Based on established law and generally written as broad legal principles
Also includes doctrinal writing and interpretations written by learned scholars
Grimard v The Queen [2009] FCA (Federal Court of Appeal) 47
The court held that both the common law and civil law are authoritative in Canada
When determining which law to look at, reference must be made to the concepts in force in the province at the time
Reception of European Law in Canada
As soon as colonial land became the subject of settlement and commerce, all transactions in relation to it were governed by English law
Once a decision was made by either the Privy Council or the House of Lords on a common law principle, all common law jurisdictions, at least in the formative years, would accept the decision as binding
What is a mixed law jurisdiction
It contains both common law and civil law
Canada is a mixed law jurisdiction
Also known as Bijuralism
What type of law does Quebec practice
Quebec’s legislative, judicial, and executive and administrative institutions and processes belong to English tradition, meanwhile many of their private laws are civilian based
What does stare decisis mean
It is a reliance on past cases
“Let the decision stand”
What is precedent
A decision in a prior case that must be followed in like cases
What are the current rules on precedent
- All Canadian courts, except the Supreme Court of Canada are bound to follow a precedent of the Supreme Court of Canada and any pre 1949 decision of the privy council that has not yet been overruled by the Supreme Court (a minority opinion of the Supreme Court is not binding)
- Provincial courts of appeal are not bound to follow a decision of the appellate court of another province
- Provincial courts of appeal will generally be bound by their own prior decisions
- Provincial courts lower than the highest appellate court are bound to follow a decision of the provinces appellate court
- Provincial courts at any level are not bound by the decision of the appellate courts of other provinces by decisions of the Federal Court of Appeal
- A decision of a court of coordinate jurisdiction are not biding, however, are highly persuasive
Define Ratio Decidendi
“reason of deciding”
This i said to constitute the binding rule for purposes of precedent
Define Obiter Dicta
Parts of the decision that are not binding (non-essential parts)
What are the two points of view in which every case must be looked at
- that of the narrowest rule that a subsequent unkind court will concede that has been laid down
- the widest rule that a later friendly court could use to support a more novel position
How can you overrule a precedent
There must be good grounds and those good grounds must be legally recognised
Legal principles may also help a judge depart from precedent (rule of law, legislative supremacy)
What are legal principles
Standards which must be respected for reasons of justice, fairness or morality
What are presumptions
They resemble rebuttable rules that provide predetermined outcomes to disputes
They relax the burden of proof that would otherwise be imposed
R v Sullivan 2022 SCC 19
The court held that a declaration of invalidity by a superior court is not binding on superior courts of other provinces but are persuasive
When does Horizontal stare decisis apply
It applies to courts of coordinate jurisdiction within a province and applied to a ruling of constitutionality of legislation
When should a judge disregard the decision of another judge of the same court
R v Sullivan 2022 SCC 19
1. When subsequence decisions have affected the validity of the impugned judgment
2. When it is demonstrated that some binding authority in case law or some relevant statute was not considered
3. When the judgement was considered a nisi prius judgement given in circumstances familiar to all trial judges, where the exigencies of the trial require an immediate decision without opportunity to fully consult authority
What is the importance of Vavilov
The court held that there is a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness as the standard of review - used to balance legal principles against presumptions
What are the two categories of presumptions
- Presumptions with basic facts: require or permit inferences to be drawn upon the proof of certain facts
- Presumptions without basic facts: rules of substantive law in relation to the burden of proof-most judicially created presumptions are these
What are the different standards of review
Reasonableness and Correctness
What is the correctness standard of review used
On pure questions of law
When should findings of fact be reversed
They should not be reversed unless it can be established that the trial judge made a ‘palpable and overriding error’
What is the basic rule regarding the review of pure questions of law
An appellate court is free to replace the opinion of the trial judge with its own - the review is one of correctness
What are the bases for deferring to the findings of fact of the trial judge
- Limiting the number, length and cost of appeals
- Promoting the autonomy and integrity of trial proceedings
- Recognising the expertise of the trial judge and his or her advantageous position
What is equity
The body of law developed by the Court of Chancery
What was the original function of Equity
To provide a corrective to the perceived harshness of the common law
What were some matters falling within the jurisdiction of the Chancery Courts
Property, Contracts, procedure, Guardianship, Commercial matters
What are some equitable claims and remedies
Fiduciary duty, Trust, Undue influence, specific performance and Injunction
KLB v British Columbia 2003 SCC 51
Notes four grounds for government liability in regards to foster care:
1. Direct negligence by the government
2. Vicarious liability of the government for tortious conduct of the foster parents
3. Breach of non-delegable duty of the government
4. Breach of fiduciary duty of the government (EQUITY)
What is the basic principle of common law interpretation
A statutory rule will supersede a judge made rule
What is domestic law
Law that exists as legislation enacted by the legislature or made as regulations by the executive
Comes in the form of common law