Indigenous Peoples and the Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Describe the components of section 35 Constitution Act 1982

A

s 35: “recognises and reaffirms the existing aboriginal and treaty rights of the aboriginal peoples of Canada”
- it cannot be extinguished by legislation
- any ambiguous expression of a treaty or document must be resolved in favour of the Aboriginal peoples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Sparrow test

A

A test from the case of R v Sparrow [1990] 1 SCR 1075 which is used to determine whether a state action is rendered unconstitutional for violating section 35 of the Constitution Act 1982

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the questions within the Sparrow test

A
  1. Does the legislation interfere with an existing Aboriginal right?
    (a) is the limitation unreasonable
    (b) does the regulation impose undue hardship
    (c) Does the regulation deny to the holders of the right their preferred means of exercising that right
  2. Justification analysis (justifying infringing on an Aboriginal right)
    (a) is there a valid legislative objective
    (b) does it involve as little infringement as possible
    (c) is fair compensation provided
    (d) has the government consulted with the indigenous group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the Van der Peet test

A

A test recognised in R v Van der peet 1996
A test for identifying whether something constituted an Aboriginal right to gain constitutional protection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the main component of the Van der Peet test

A

In order to be an Aboriginal right an activity must be an element of practice, custom, or tradition integral to the distinctive culture of the Aboriginal group claiming the right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Powley test

A

A test recognised in R v Powley 2003
A test to determine whether an individual is Metis for the purposes of asserting section 35 rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the components of the Powley test

A
  1. Identify the alleged right
  2. Establish that there was a historic rights-bearing Metis community that was formed after contract but before effective European control in the area was “shared customs, traditions and collective identity”
  3. This historic community has continuity with a contemporary Metis community
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is “Honour of the Crown”

A

The duty to consult with potentially affected indigenous communities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Manitoba Metis Federation Inc v Canada (AG) 2013 SCC 14

A

Explains the concept of the crown - it arises from the Crown’s assertion of sovereignty over an Aboriginal people and de facto control of land and resources that were formerly in the control of that people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Where did the Aboriginal title test come from

A

Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia 2014 SCC 44

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the Aboriginal title test

A

The test for proving Aboriginal title
1. Requirement of sufficient occupation of the land claimed to establish title at the time of assertion of European sovereignty
2. Requirement of continuity of occupation where present occupation is relied on
3. Requirement of exclusive historic occupation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is section 91(24) Constitution Act 1887 (UK)

A

The federal government has exclusive authority over “Indians and lands reserved for Indians”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Bill C-15

A

Canadian domestic law - An act respecting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
The Government must take all measures necessary to ensure that the laws of Canada are consistent with the United Nations Declarations on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Corrective Justice

A

Its a form of justice that aims to put the injured party in the position that he or she would have been in had the injustice not occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Three remedies through corrective justice

A
  1. The Land Transfer Solution - land must be returned where due, if not possible, then compensation should be paid
  2. The subsistence Theory - the right to access particular resources
  3. The Institutional Approach - the right of Indigenous Peoples to choose their form of governance through institutions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Campbell v AG BC?AG Cda & Nisga’a Nation 2000 BCSC 123

A

The court held that Aboriginal peoples have the right to self-government under section 35 of the Constitution Act 1982

17
Q

What is the duty to consult

A

The duty of the Government to discuss with Aboriginal Peoples when there is a potential impact on their rights

18
Q

When is a duty to consult triggered

A

Clyde River (Hamlet) v Petroleum Geo-Services Inc 2017 SCC 40
It is triggered when the Crown has actual or constructive knowledge of potential impact or interference on Aboriginal rights

19
Q

When does the duty to consult not apply

A

It does not apply to the law-making process
Mikisew Cree First Nation v Canada (Governor General in Council) 2018 SCC

20
Q

What is the degree of consultation required in a duty to consult

A

the degree of consultation depends on strength of claims and seriousness of impact
Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v Enbridge Pipelines [2017] 1 SCR 1099

21
Q

Judicial review of First Nation Elections

A

Passion v Dene Tha’First Nation 2018 FCA 648
The courts have the jurisdiction to review decisions regarding the validity of First nation elections
Deference towards administrative decision makers

22
Q

What is Aboriginal Title

A

Aboriginal title is a collective title and is subject to the ultimate limit that those uses cannot destroy the ability of the land to sustain future generations of Aboriginal Peoples

23
Q

In what case does the Supreme court recognise the idea of Aboriginal title

A

Calder v British Columbia 1973 - recognises it as being part of the common law

24
Q

What are the principles of treaty interpretation set out by the Supreme Court

A

R v Marshall
1. Examine the words of the treaty clause at issue to determine their facial meaning, noting any patent ambiguities and misunderstandings that may have arisen from linguistic or cultural differences
2. Consider the meaning or different meanings which have arisen from the wording of the treaty right against the treaty’s historical and cultural backdrop

25
Q

What are some treaty remedies

A

Damages - consist of court-ordered monetary payments made from one party to the other
Declaration - not directly coercive, they do not expressly mandate that a party must do or refrain from doing anything - formal judicial pronouncements as to the state of the law of the parties’ legal relationship