Source Analysis 1 Flashcards
Describe how people interact with religion
- How does this social factor impact how people think about the role of religion in their own lives
- How does this social factor impact how people view religion in society
- Does this social factor make them feel sympathetic or hostile towards religion
Identify social factors that influence
- Consumerism
- Historical issues/events
- Social disadvantage/Hardship
- Social attitude of Secularism
Describe Consumerism
Consumerism refers to a culture that focuses on material possessions and/or consumption of goods.
Consumerism is characterized by;
- Excessive spending
- Greed and envy of others
- Focusing on material wealth and goods
-Finding identity and meaning in goods and services
Describe historical issues/events
There are many historical issues and or events namely;
- Same sex marriage
- Sectarianism
- Vatican II
- Reformations
Describe social disadvantage/Hardship
Social disadvantage and hardship include poverty, poor health conditions, war and natural disasters
Describe secularism
Secularism refers to a social or political philosophy that rejects all forms of religion.
With there being two types of secularism;
Soft secularism asserts the right to be free from religious rule and teachings, and the right to freedom from governmental imposition of religion upon the people within a state.
Hard secularism asserts that religion (religious considerations/expressions/references) should be ignored, excluded or removed from social life and political matters
Big paragraph format
T - “Insert social factor is a social factor that supports/hinders/obstructs how a person interacts with religion.
E - define and describe the social factor
E - example
A - connect social factor to impact and detail the interaction with religion - e.g how do people act as a result of this social factor’s impact
L - summarise main point
Origin
Author date
Purpose
Draw conclusions
POV
Audience
Gaps
Differing or conflicting views
Tentative or decisive
trying to comfort, convince, condemn or convert?
Context of a source
Historical context
Religious context
Political Context
Social/Cultural context
Reliability
Author of source - is it authoritative
Consistent or contradictory
How recently was it published
Usefullness
Intended audience
Is it informative
Does it arrive to any conclusions
Does it contribute to anything to the course content
Contestable nature
Critically question a held position
Obvious gaps or bias
diversity of views of the subject
overly sympathetic or hostile
Point of view
How one sees or thinks of something
e.g cartoonist may hold the pov that a public figure is incompetent so they make an unflattering caricature of them