Sociology-Beliefs-Organisations/Movements/Members Flashcards
What are the types of religious organisation?
Church and sect, denomination and cult, new religious movements, and sects and cults
Who was the first person to attempt to identify the features of different types of religious organisation?
Ernst Troeltsch, who distinguished between two main types; the church and the sect
How does Troeltsch define churches?
Large organisations, often with millions of members such as the catholic church, run by a bureaucratic hierarchy of professional priests, and they claim a monopoly of the truth. They are universalistic, aiming to include the whole of society, although they tend to be more attractive to the higher classes as they are ideologically conservative and often closely linked to the state (eg British sovereign is head of both state and church of England)
How does Troeltsch define sects?
Small, exclusive groups. Unlike churches, sects are hostile to wider society and they expect a high level of commitment. They draw their members from the poor and oppressed. Many are led by a charismatic leader rather than a bureaucratic hierarchy. The only similarity with churches is that sects too believe they have a monopoly of religious truth
What does Niebuhr talk about?
He talks about denominations such as Methodism, and describes them as lying midway between churches and sects. Membership is less exclusive than a sect, but they don’t appeal to the whole of society like a church. Like churches they broadly accept society’s values but are not linked to the state. They impose some minor restrictions on members, such as forbidding alcohol, but are not as demanding as sects. Unlike both church and sect, they are tolerant of other religious organisations and don’t claim monopoly of the truth
What is a cult?
Highly individualistic, loose-knit and usually small grouping around some shared themes and interests, but usually without a sharply defined and exclusive belied system. Usually led by ‘practitioners’ or ‘therapists’, who claim special knowledge. Like denominations, cults are usually tolerant of other organisations and their beliefs. They don’t demand strong commitment from followers, who are often more like customers or trainees than members. They may have little further involvement with the cult once they’ve acquired its beliefs and techniques. Many are world-affirming, claiming to improve life in this world
What two characteristics does Wallis highlight when summing up the similarities and differences between religious organisations?
How they see themselves (churches and sects claim a monopoly but denominations and cults accept there are many valid interpretations), and how they are seen by wider society (churches and denominations are seen as respectable and legitimate but sects and cults are seen as deviant)
What does Bruce argue about Troeltsch’s definitions?
His idea of a church having religious monopoly only applies to the catholic church before the 16th century protestant reformation, when it had a religious monopoly over society, symbolised by its massive and imposing cathedrals. Since then, sects and cults have flourished and religious diversity has become the norm
How have religious organisations changed in todays society?
Churches are no longer truly churches in Troelsch’s sense because they have lost their monopoly and been reduced to the status of denominations competing with all the rest
Since the 1960s there have been many new religious movements, what are some examples?
The Unification Church, the Children of God, Transcendental Meditation, Krishna Consciousness and many more
How does Wallis categorise these new religious movements?
World-rejecting, world-accommodating and world-affirming
What are world-rejecting new religious movements?
Similar to Troeltsch’s sects. Examples include the Unification Church, Krishna Consciousness, Children of God, the Mason Family, the Branch Davidian and the People’s Temple. They vary greatly in size, from a handful of members to hundreds and thousands
What are the characteristics of world-rejecting NRMs?
Clearly religious organisations with a clear notion of God, they are highly critical of the outside world and they expect or seek radical change, to achieve salvation members must make a sharp break with their former life, members live communally with restricted contact with the outside world (movement controls all aspects of their lives and is often accused of ‘brainwashing’ them), they often have conservative moral codes
What are world-accommodating NRMs?
Often breakaways from existing mainstream churches or denominations, such as neo-Pentecostalists who split from catholicism, or Subud from Islam. They neither accept nor reject the world, and they often focus on religious rather than worldly matters, seeking to restore the spiritual purity of religion. Eg neo-pentecostalists believe that other Christian religions have lost the Holy Spirit. Members tend to lead conventional lives
What are world-affirming NRMs?
These groups differ from all other religious groups and may lack some of the conventional features of religion, such as collective worship, and some are not highly organised. However, like religions, the offer their followers access to spiritual or supernatural powers. Examples include Scientology, Soka Gakkai, TM and Human Potential
What are the characteristics of world-affirming NRMs?
They accept the world as it is. They are optimistic and promise followers success in terms of mainstream goals and values eg careers and relationships. They are non-exclusive and tolerant of other religions, but claim to offer additional special knowledge or techniques to help followers unlock their own spiritual powers and achieve success. They have been described as psychologising religions offering this-worldly gratification. Most are cults, whose followers are often customers rather than members, and entry is through training. The movement place few demands on them and they carry on normal lives
In general, out of all of the NRMs studied by Wallis, which ones are the most successful?
World-affirming NRMs. Eg scientology had about 165,000 members in the UK in 2005 as compared with only 1,200 from the Unification Church
What is the evaluation for new religious movements?
Wallis offers a useful way of classifying the new religious movements but some argue it is not clear whether he is categorising them according to the movement’s teachings, or individual members’ beliefs. He ignores the diversity of beliefs that may exist within an NRM
How does Wallis himself evaluate his categorisation?
Recognises that real NRMs will rarely fit neatly into his typology and some, such as 3HO (Health happy holy organisation) may have features of all three types. Nevertheless, many sociologists find such typologies useful as a way of analysing and comparing the significant features of NRMs
How do Stark and Bainbridge evaluate new religious movements?
They reject the idea of constructing such typologies altogether. Instead they argue we should distinguish between religious organisations using just one criterion-the degree of conflict or tension between the religious group and wider society
What two groups do Stark and Bainbridge identify that are in conflict with wider society?
Sects (result from schisms-splits in existing organisations. Break away from churches usually due to disagreements about doctrines) and cults (new religions or ones new too that particular society)
In general, how do Stark and Bainbridge see sects and cults?
See sects as promising other-worldly benefits to those suffering economic or ethical deprivation, and see cults as offering this-worldly benefits to more prosperous individuals suffering psychic and organismic deprivation (normlessness and health problems)
How do Stark and Bainbridge subdivide cults?
According to how organised they are. They split them into audience cults, client cults and cultic movements
What are audience cults?
Least organised and don’t involve formal membership or much commitment. There is little interaction between members. Participation may be through the media. Examples include astrology and UFO cults