Sociology as a Science Flashcards
List as many sociologist involved as possible
16
Durkheim, Comte, Popper, Kuhn, Weber, Cicourel, Blumer, Charlesworth, Titchen and Hobson, Douglas, Kaplan, Gomm, Sayer, Keat and Urry,
Positivists, main gist
Sociology CAN and NEEDS TO be objective, JUST LIKE NATURAL SCIENCES.
thus, sociology must use objective observaiton & collection of statistics to create a “Law of Human Behaviour” which can occur when enough data exists to support a given correlation
Interpretativists main gist
Sociology IS NOT objective, but CASUAL RELATIONSHIPS CAN BE FORMED.
it CANNOT be like the natural sciences because “in science, substances are acted upon by external forces and react to stimuli. in the case of humans, human consciousness exists and causes actions to be different.”
BUT as long as YOU UNDERSTAND THE HUMAN MOTIVATION, u can be technically SCIENTIFIC
Social Interactionists main gist
(UNDER INTERPRETVISM)
need to study social interactions to discover the “self concept” of individuals
Phenomenologists main gist
you CAN NOT MAKE ANY SCIENTIFIC CONCLUSIONS because all humans do is CLASSIFY THINGS and all phenomena mean different things to different people.
you can, however, REVEAL the biases and learn about humans by exposing their classification systems
Realists main gist
also called “Post-Positivists”
SCIENCE ITSELF “assumes” the existence of things— atoms have subparticles and viruses have organelles, and magnetic fields are real which can’t really be proven, thus SOCIOLOGY is SCIENTIFIC bc EVEN REAL SCIENCE ISNT, thus interpretivist objections to positivism are irrelevant bc positive is based on the assumption that science is a thing.
also, we should focus on understanding STRUCTURES. all science does is discover a STUCTURE wherein differences in variables can still leadto different outcomes (think: Darwin– things evolve, but their environments and others lead to completely diff outcomes) Sociology, too, SHOULD REVEAL STRUCTURES
Comte
Augsutus Comte, father of sociology, was inspired duriing the renaissance and insurgence of natural sciences and wanted to make sociology scientific, believes you can only count on observation and statistics
Durkhiem
Positivists, believed in “social facts” —beliefs or systems or structures that could be quantified.
Researched suicide through official statistics following an inductive methodology (collect data to support a claim), discovered “Suicide rates always increase during economic slump or boom”
Popper
Hypothetico-deductive:
create hypothesis,
attempt to disporove it with data.
marxism as a “pseudo science” which cannot be falsified.
> is technically a positivist
Weber
“Verstehen” - imagining urself in someone else’s shoes
in protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, Weber focuses on how the protestant’s interpretations & beliefs regarding tehir value system (not JUST its existence) caused the rise of capitalism, thus the individual consciousness is super important.
Blumer
any positivist looking at data “does not significantly interact with the life they are trying to analyze”
u must immerse urself in social reality to interpret it.
eg. “industrialization leads to nuclear families” completely disregards the individual’s interpretations as to why family structures changed.
Titchen and Hobson
“Phenomenology is the study of phenomena (any event or experience) AS it is lived and interpreted by those that experience them”
Cicourel
studied the justice system with regards to juvenile deliquents.
found that justice was largely negoatiable and based on the official’s existing stereotypes of what “the typical delinquent” looked like– the actual action was secondary to the arbitrary classification of the crime based on personal bias.
thus, “to assume there is a true crime rate is to oversimply and misunderstand the variety of meanings of crime present in the social world”
Douglas, in critique of Durkheim
“bias in identifying suicide” as coroners and family may be less incline to admit to a suicide.
also, suicides are NOT of the same type and do not all mean the same thing. suicides, for example, bc of economic failure vs as a ritual vs to obtain sympathy, suicides in different societal contexts, etc.
Kaplan
Reconstructed logics = what scientists claim to be their methodologies
Logics in use = what actually happens.
eg. an “objective study” may “omit a finding” because it doesn’t go along with their research. – scientists are INFLUENCED by the theory they are seeking to prove.