Sociology and Value Freedom Flashcards
SHOULD BE VALUE FREE VS VALUE DRIVEN
What are the 4 explanations as to why Sociology should be VALUE FREE?
- Early Positivists
- Modern Positivists
- Positivist (Durkheim)
- Methods (Experiments)
What are the 4 explanations as to why Sociology should be VALUE DRIVEN?
- Committed Sociologists
- Criticisms of Funding Bodies
- Interpretivists
- Limitations of Experiments
What is meant by ‘value free’
Sociology should be based on objective, true facts - more scientific without opinion.
What is meant by ‘value driven’
Sociology should include personal values, subjective, and should take a stand to support a group/issue
How else might a question say ‘value driven’
Value laden
What did Early Positivists believe in?
Early Positivists, such as Comte, believed in the Enlightenment Project - believing science could discover factual knowledge to improve society.
Early Positivists: What was the Enlightenment Project?
A modernist notion of progress applying rational knowledge and thinking to social problems.
What is Sociology considered? What is its role, according to Early Positivists?
Sociology is the ‘science of society’ - discovering the truth about how society works and fixing social problems - a crucial role.
Early Positivists: Who saw themselves a scientist? Why?
Marx saw himself a scientist, believed his methods of historical analysis revealed the line of development for society, involving an evolution, leading to a future classless, communist society.
By discovering the truth about how society works, sociologists can do what, according to Early Positivists?
Able to say objectively and with scientific certainty what is best for society, without values interfering.
What explanation of why sociology should be value laden matches Early Positivists?
Committed Sociologists
Committed Sociologists: What does Gouldner suggest about Sociologists and their discipline?
Marxist, Gouldner, argues sociologists should be committed to their discipline by openly taking sides and advocating the values/interests of a particular group - the ‘underdogs’ of society (EMs, WC, women)
Committed Sociologists: Who would take a similar stance to Gouldner?
Feminists: Sociologists should be on the side of females so they have a voice in a patriarchal society. Empathising with thee ppts = verstehen.
Committed Sociologists: In order to advocate for the ‘underdogs’ of society, sociologists..
In order to advocate for the ‘underdogs’, Sociology should be value driven, not value free, in order to improve things for the disadvantaged groups in society.
Committed Sociologists: What is the significant different between social and natural sciences?
The natural sciences are value free and opinions of scientists are not expected to impose values into scientific research - highlights a significant difference between social and natural sciences.
Modern Positivists: What did Positivists in the 20th century believe? Why did they think this?
Positivists in 20th century believed their values were irrelevant to research. Desire to be scientific was the main reason for this, and as the natural sciences did not include moral/opinions, neither should sociology.