Sociology and Social Policy Flashcards
CAN/SHOULD INFLUENCE SOCIAL POLCY VS CANNOT/SHOULD NOT
What are the 4 reasons as to why Sociology can and should influence Social Policy?
- Functionalism and Positivism
- Liberal Feminism
- Social Democrats
- New Right
What are the 4 reasons why Sociology cannot and should not influence Social Policy?
- Piecemeal approach does not work
- Difference Feminism
- Marxists
- Radical Feminism
What is meant by Social Policy?
Plans and actions of government to improve society.
What are some examples of social policies?
- ZTP, gay marriage, divorce, ROSLA, education policies etc..
What did Early Positivists, such as Comte and Durkheim, view Sociology as capable of?
viewed sociology as a science that could discover causes of social problems and scientifically based solutions for them.
Functionalism and Positivism: What was Comte and Durkheim’s approach apart of?
Enlightenment Project, which used science and reason to improve society.
Functionalism and Positivism: How do Functionalists view the state/state policies?
State is beneficial for society and serves interests of all, producing and implementing policies for the good of all.
Functionalism and Positivism: How do Functionalists consider state policies? This mean that the relationship between sociology and state is…
State policies help society run more smoothly and efficiently - the relationship between state and sociology is positive, involves co-operation for a MOP.
Functionalism and Positivism: What kind of social policies do Functionalists favour?
‘piecemeal social engineering’
Functionalism and Positivism: What is meant by the ‘piecemeal social engineering’ policies that Functionalists favour?
Taking a step-by-step approach, tackling one issue at a time. By doing this, society’s problems can be manageably tackled.
Functionalism and Positivism: TRUE or FALSE; Functionalists take a MOP view by making society better one step at a time.
TRUE
What argument contradicts Functionalism and Positivism?
Piecemeal approach does not work.
Why does a piecemeal approach not work to solve societal issues?
By tackling issues one at a time, problems as a whole are not actually being solved.
What is an example of a social issue that is tackled, but defeated due to wider society?
Eg. Government aim tackle WC differences in education via policies such as Bursaries/FSMs - but this is defeated by the influence of poverty in wider society.
Why is a piecemeal approach not useful? Examples?
Social problems (eg. educational underachievement is a simple aspect of wider structural inequality). A one step at a time piecemeal approach is not useful if structural issues aren’t solved in first instance.
Therefore, according to the ‘piecemeal approach does not work’ explanation, what is the relationship between sociology and social policy like?
negative as problems are not being solved within society.
Social Democrats: What do social democrats favour?
Favour a major redistribution of wealth and income from the rich to the poor.
Social Democrats: What does Townsend suggest sociologists should be involved in?
researching social problems and should make policy recommendations to eradicate them.
Social Democrats: What did Townsend conduct research on? What did he recommend, based on his findings?
Conducted research on poverty and, based on his findings, made recommendations for policies such as higher benefits and more public spending on health, education and welfare.
Therefore, according to Social Democrats, it is possible for sociology and the state to..
Have a positive relationship because policy recommendations can tackle inequalities.
What arguments contradicts Social Democrats?
Marxists.