Sociological Theories of Crime Flashcards
What does Bowlby suggest about attachment to caregivers and criminality?
Bowlby’s attachment theory explained that without secure attachment in the first two years of life, the consequence of maternal
deprivation can include delinquency, increased aggression and
psychopathy. Bowlby’s findings were supported by American psychiatrist
Dorothy Lewis who found that serious criminality is caused by key events in
childhood such as abuse as a child or witnessing a violent event.
How can Bowbly’s attachment theory be seen in the UKs prison population?
This can be supported by 2021 Ministry of Justice figures that show 24% of prisoners
were taken into care as a child (compared to 2% of the general population)
and 41% had observed violence in the home as a child (compared to 14% of
the general population).
Summarise international comparators of the impact of socio-economics and criminality.
In 2020 in Scotland, figures showed
that approximately 34% of prisoners came from the 10% most deprived
areas. Only 1% came from the 10% least deprived areas. Similarly, in the
US there is a correlation between poverty and incarceration ― 2020 findings from the American Action Forum found that adults in poverty are three times more likely to be arrested than those who aren’t and the
percentage of those in poverty before being arrested was 57% for men and
72% for women compared to a national poverty rate of 11%. Indeed, these
correlations are clear across the world in Brazil, 95% of prisoners are poor
How might Becker’s labelling theory explain racial inequalities in the CJS?
In the US, there is
evidence that young black males may be labelled as deviant by law
enforcement. African American males are incarcerated at five times the
rate of white Americans. A 2021 study entitled ‘The Color of Justice’
showed that black Americans as young as nine felt they were treated
differently by law enforcement. In England and Wales, in 2021, 27% of the
prison population was from a minority ethnic group compared to 13% of
the UK population (2020 estimates).
What is the labelling theory?
Essentially, the argument is that the criminal or deviant is an individual who
has been labelled by society. Labelling is a process by which individuals
and/or groups classify certain types of behaviour and certain individuals. The
actions and motives of the labeller is a key concern as it highlights issues of
who has the power to impose their definitions on others and of the extent to
which there is selective enforcement of the law. Giddens (1993) argues that
‘the labels applied to create categories of deviance thus express the power
structure of society’.
What is Durkheim’s beliefs on crime?
Crime is seen by Durkheim as a social fact and therefore it must play a purpose in society. Given that crime is behaviour that breaks rules it might seem odd to talk about its functions. However, Durkheim developed
the argument that crime is inevitable and must also be necessary and useful for society
What is the strain theory?
Merton created the ‘strain theory’ and he started analysis from the functionalist viewpoint that social stability is based on a shared set of values. Merton rejected
individualistic explanations for
criminal behaviour, arguing that it
came from individuals or groups responding in an expected and normal manner to the social situations they found themselves in. He argued that crime results from the gap between the cultural goals of a society and the legitimate means available to achieve those goals. Merton argued that
high rates of deviant behaviour amongst certain groups of people would be due to those people responding normally to their social situation and the pressures they faced at that particular moment
Why is the strain theory criticised?
Merton’s theory has been criticised as it does not adequately explain all types of criminal behaviour. It is difficult to point to the material goals that juvenile delinquents, hooligans or rapists could be seen as chasing for example. There is also no real explanation as to why some individuals conform
in specific situations whilst others don’t
Explain Albert Cohen and his Subcultural Theories.
Cohen questions whether
criminal and delinquent behaviour is caused by a desire for material
goals. Like Merton, he focuses on working class delinquency but argues that a large amount of this behaviour is expressive in character and doesn’t seek to attain material things. Delinquency centred on
vandalism or violence are two examples of such behaviour that is not concerned with material gain. Cohen argues that society is dominated by middle class values and
these are reinforced through the education system and by the mass media. Working class boys reject the values of school and form groups which emphasise different, essentially delinquent, values - they form what
Cohen defined as a delinquent subculture.
Why can Cohen and his subculture theories be rejected?
Cohen’s approach can be criticised along the same line of Merton’s in that it assumes that all working class want to achieve middle class goals and values. Furthermore, the extent to which working class delinquents hold anti-middle class, oppositional values is also debatable.
What is another reason Cohen and his subculture theories be rejected?
Such explanations ignore the fact that the majority of young males faced with similar situations do not join delinquent gangs. Subcultural theories focus on young offenders reacting against middle class
society and the norms associated with it; however they make no explanation as to why such young offenders stop offending as they become older, despite class not changing as people age.
What do Merton and Cohen have in common?
Both Cohen and Merton see criminal behaviour as resulting from the strains that occur as a result on
basic inequality in society. This implies that equality of opportunity would be desirable and would
have an impact on the extent of criminal behaviour.
Why can labelling theories be criticised?
It was criticised for implying that criminals were powerless and passive victims who have just had the misfortune to be labelled criminal. This seemed to ignore the fact that criminals might often choose to become involved in crime. Too great an emphasis is given to the social reaction, thereby minimising the role of the individual. Linked with this, labelling is also criticised as there is little explanation as to why certain people break laws and others do not.
What is the link between Marxism and crime?
From a
Marxist perspective crime is largely the product of capitalism, and the relatively high rate of crime in capitalist societies is an indicator of the contradictions that are inherent to such a system.
Thus many forms of crime are to be expected
under such a system. This is due, in part, to the ability of the powerful to criminalise that which threatens their interest
What is a Marxist quote regarding crime?
‘crime is a by-product of the political
economy of capitalism’.